Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple has stepped in to warn that EU proposals to force Google to open Android to competing AI services pose serious risks to user privacy, security, and safety.

european-commission.jpg

Apple's latest submission to the EU comes (via Reuters) in response to the European Commission's call for feedback on draft measures designed to help Google comply with the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The proposals would allow competing AI services to interact with Android apps to perform actions such as sending emails, ordering food, or sharing photos. Google has already pushed back on the plans, arguing they would undermine key privacy and security safeguards for European users.

Apple, which is itself now subject to EU measures requiring it to open up its own ecosystem, said it has a strong interest in the case given its own operating systems for iPhone, iPad, and Mac. In its submission, Apple said the draft measures "raise urgent and serious concerns," warning that if confirmed, "they would create profound risks for user privacy, security, and safety as well as device integrity and performance."

Apple also took aim at the rapidly evolving state of AI as a particular source of concern, arguing that risks are "especially acute in the context of rapidly evolving AI systems whose capabilities, behaviours, and threat vectors remain unpredictable." The company questioned the EU's technical expertise in drawing up the proposals, stating that the Commission is "substituting judgments made by Google's engineers for its own judgment based on less than three months of work," and suggesting the only discernible goal of the draft measures is "open and unfettered access."

Apple has a long history of clashing with EU regulators over the DMA. The company challenged the regulation in court in October 2025, and urged regulators to scrap it entirely the month before, arguing it had created security vulnerabilities and worsened the user experience. The EU said it had no intention of repealing the law in response.

The feedback period for the proposals ran from April 27 to May 13, 2026. The European Commission has said it will carefully assess all submissions and may adjust the proposed measures as a result, though its final decision must be adopted within six months of the opening of the specification proceedings, giving a deadline of July 27, 2026. The EU separately concluded in May 2026 that the DMA has had a positive impact overall, setting aside Apple's lobbying for the regulation to be revised.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple Defends Google Against EU Proposal to Give AI Rivals Access to Services
 
I can understand apple's point of view, the 'intellectual property' you have developed is now communal. the downside (over longer term) is the lack of incentive to develop new technologies (presumably more useful or efficient) due to lack of cost recovery.
 
There are massive security issues created if every software component has to be broken up and sold separately. Security is very difficult to begin with, and, if N! unique security interfaces are created and have to be engineered, implemented, vetted, tested, broken into, patched, ad infinitum, for all the software components that might exist, it is simply an impossible task, doomed to failure, and dooming all of us to security hell. There have to be a few clear interoperable standards between major software components. For example, we now finally have TLS 1.3 at that status for browsers to talk to servers. After 30 years, there are still vestiges of early SSLx that people are afraid to scrub out, let alone finally migrating off TLS 1.2 to 1.3 - about 8 years?

I hope Apple, Google, and the European Commission all understand how much work is involved in securing this stuff.
 
The EU should hire real competent people who understand technology when making decisions like this, because it’s obvious these proposals are made by politicians who can barely send an email.
Some of the early proposals were good ( GPDR. Customers data must stay in Europe, etc..), but right now, they seem to have lost the plot and working in endangering citizens by forcing Operating Systems to become Lego pieces that anybody can play with at the price of ever expanding vulnerabilities.

The advent of AI is already making us the least secure we have ever been in the history of computing.
 
Last edited:
Maybe Apple should sell an iPhone Blank in the EU. Basically just the hardware and then let all those innovative EU tech companies design and implement their own OS. Then all the fair competition hungry EU citizens will have all the choice in the world.
Nah. They can resurrect Symbian and make their own phones. Still, trying to force a platform to allow direct interaction via AI is bonkers.
 
Maybe Apple should sell an iPhone Blank in the EU. Basically just the hardware and then let all those innovative EU tech companies design and implement their own OS. Then all the fair competition hungry EU citizens will have all the choice in the world.
IPhone hardware with a good os like android would be amazing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steve Adams
I can understand apple's point of view, the 'intellectual property' you have developed is now communal. the downside (over longer term) is the lack of incentive to develop new technologies (presumably more useful or efficient) due to lack of cost recovery.

Not to mention we all know how quickly these same bodies will try to penalize the IP owners when things go sideways because of the very issues they raised from the start. Remember the EU was pushing to give randos from WhatsApp the ability to directly message people on iMessage. You can bet the farm that they would absolutely try to fine Apple for any resulting fraud or nuisance from that crapshow.
 
Kudos for the EU calling for feedback on their draft measures, but that will be worthless if they then ignore the feedback. I've had friends that do this.
I don’t trust the EU corrupt officials who make these bad laws, can’t wait for someone to undo this mess in the EU
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.