Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
For all the complaints about what the 16e doesn’t have or should have, Apple gave us some good decent stuff.

Guys the SE lineup has always been about keeping the price down Super Duper Low, Dollar Tree low. Now keep in mind inflation has a role too in how hard it is to keep prices low and for Apple 🍎 to make a profit too. Also within the past 4 years Apple has been shaking up and separating/differentiating there iPhone lineup.

The 16e has everything the SE crowd needs and then some with Apple Intelligence, snappy A18 chip and 8gb ram. MagSafe can be implemented with a 3rd party case. This phone is gonna be free with most cellular plans/trade ins and gonna sell like Hot Cakes 🥞 during back to school and holiday season. Cha ching Apple. CEO Tim Cook has created the perfect iPhone lineup. Steve Jobs would be proud. Can’t wait to see the iPhone 17 Air 🤤
 
Last edited:
The missing features are marginal at best. Is this SE the slam-dunk that the original was? Probably not, because the price difference isn't great enough.

But at least Apple's "budget" phone has finally abolished the asinine rounded edges that have degraded the later-gen SEs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdsapplefan
😂 SE crowd don’t care about fast processor speed or AirDrop or keyless entry or modem speed. They do care about Battery 🔋 life and most bang for there buck and that is just what the 16e offers exactly.
We do care about the speed. If I was terribly worried about battery life through the first two years of having a 2022 iPhone SE, I probably wouldn't have had it. It isn't awful, but it's not really better than the iPhone 8 and it certainly depends on how efficient their (not there) programming is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
My argument is that those features that Apple left out (MagSafe, UWB) should be part of the BOM. For all their iPhones going forward. MagSafe is being touted an integral part of the Qi2 standard that Apple itself is pushing, but yet when the opportunity to include it in their new entry level iPhone is presented, they whiff, leaving Accessories monies on the table. The UWB and its precision finding is a competitive advantage in selling Watches, AirTags and AirPods along with some of its other functions and anything HomeKit-related, which is a market that Apple supposedly is going to try and enter to increase revenue and market penetration as the entire of HomeKit seems to be a bit of a mish mash.

The argument is Apple is upselling everyone to the iPhone 16, which may or may not be true as they just jacked up the cost $170 over the previous model, which it seems dubious that people are simply going to say, screw it, let’s just spend another $200 on the iPhone 16.

The phone isn’t gimped, hate that word, but it’s an incredibly mediocre value and more of a pricing experiment for Apple. I just think those two extra features would have helped it be a better value for those entry level buyers who are already getting a price hike to boot.

Not to worry. If people really need MagSafe, there are plenty of options within Apple and other phone manufacturers.

Apple has gamed out the market for a budget iPhone long ago. The BOM (driving features), along with manufacturing costs and required percentage margin of both, needs to be in line for those looking for a budget iPhone at the right price.

Despite many here feeling otherwise, Apple's massive success manufacturing and selling 600,000 iPhones per day (on the average), and being one of the most successful tech companies in the world, gives them insight as to what's needed in an iPhone for people on a budget.

Personally... I don't need it, even though it's there on my 16PM iPhone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee and I7guy
I'm not sure if this was driven by cost-cutting or product differentiation (or both).

To better speculate about this, it would help if we had an estimate of how much MagSafe actually adds to the BOM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
I'm not sure if this was driven by cost-cutting or product differentiation (or both).

To better speculate about this, it would help if we had an estimate of how much MagSafe actually adds to the BOM.
It was probably cost-cutting move to take out MagSafe Qi2 and Ultra Wideband, but I bet they will be in the next “e” model 3-4 years from now.

If Apple wanted to differentiate they could’ve just said no Apple Intelligence and no 8gb Ram on the 16e. So if you want AI gotta get the the 16 standard at minimum. Pony up that extra $200 for that trillion dollar company 🍎
 
You know...THEM
The giant ants that were the result of Atomic bomb testing.

IMG_7786.jpeg

IMG_7785.jpeg
 
It was probably cost-cutting move to take out MagSafe Qi2 and Ultra Wideband, but I bet they will be in the next “e” model 3-4 years from now.

If Apple wanted to differentiate they could’ve just said no Apple Intelligence and no 8gb Ram on the 16e. So if you want AI gotta get the the 16 standard at minimum. Pony up that extra $200 for that trillion dollar company 🍎
Apple seemingly values apple intelligence over MagSafe. And if the $200 is a sticking point people will shop elsewhere.
 
  • Love
Reactions: cdsapplefan
my unsubstantiated rumour is that the 16E is simply a frankenstein of many old phones so that they could reuse old parts and tooling that have already paid off it's R&D.

The front came from the 14, and the back came from a iPhone XR. the XR didn't have magsafe either ;)
 
It was probably cost-cutting move to take out MagSafe Qi2 and Ultra Wideband, but I bet they will be in the next “e” model 3-4 years from now.

If Apple wanted to differentiate they could’ve just said no Apple Intelligence and no 8gb Ram on the 16e. So if you want AI gotta get the the 16 standard at minimum. Pony up that extra $200 for that trillion dollar company 🍎
I think, given their push for AI, that they'd prefer not to differentiate phones on that basis, if possible (even though they did it on the iPhone 15 vs. 15 Pro, probably because of the difference in RAM).

So I don't think that's where they'd want to do product differentation. And thus the absence of product differentiation in that category doesn't necessarily mean they weren't trying to do it elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: cdsapplefan
Apple seemingly values apple intelligence over MagSafe. And if the $200 is a sticking point people will shop elsewhere.
Yep as there heavily investing in and pushing hard in Apple Intelligence they were forced to put it in the 16e. They know from the SE 3 that MagSafe can be easily implemented by a 3rd party case, so that’s a easy fix solution and cost cutting that can be easily done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Here are my ideas on why no MagSafe and more thoughts:

1. Folks looking to upgrade from anything iPhone 12 and up might already have MagSafe accessories, in that case they will want to stay with the 16/16 Pro to protect their investment/experienxe.

2. iPhone 16e price may have tariff costs built into the price. When everything else will have to go up in price the 16e will be the most affordable option that doesn’t have to scale up.

3. Features the C1 modem/chip and that gets a bunch of the phone out in the market for real world testing. Also gets more folks on Apple Intelligence.

4. Another thing I’ll call out is that most people use their phones simply and if you want the most features of a toolset (smartphone) you buy the the flagships. But most Android buyers according to Android Authority bought a $150 Samsung A15 4G in 2024. Same statistics posted show iPhone 15 Pro Max $1199 sold the most units in 2024. Even with that most folks don’t know how to use their tools. But point is Apple is offering a $599 iPhone not a $150 phone. What would that even look like? Just checked on eBay (2.23.2025) folks will pay ~$189 for a used original iPhone 😮.
 
Here are my ideas on why no MagSafe and more thoughts:

1. Folks looking to upgrade from anything iPhone 12 and up might already have MagSafe accessories, in that case they will want to stay with the 16/16 Pro to protect their investment/experienxe.

2. iPhone 16e price may have tariff costs built into the price. When everything else will have to go up in price the 16e will be the most affordable option that doesn’t have to scale up.

3. Features the C1 modem/chip and that gets a bunch of the phone out in the market for real world testing. Also gets more folks on Apple Intelligence.

4. Another thing I’ll call out is that most people use their phones simply and if you want the most features of a toolset (smartphone) you buy the the flagships. But most Android buyers according to Android Authority bought a $150 Samsung A15 4G in 2024. Same statistics posted show iPhone 15 Pro Max $1199 sold the most units in 2024. Even with that most folks don’t know how to use their tools. But point is Apple is offering a $599 iPhone not a $150 phone. What would that even look like? Just checked on eBay (2.23.2025) folks will pay ~$189 for a used original iPhone 😮.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: mvdrl
 
Because the SE models do not have MagSafe. This was expected. This is not a feature that was dropped. The SE3 did not have MagSafe.
Yup. I think many of us have been looking at Apple adding "16" to the model number for this iPhone, and that's led us to think that it should've had all the same basic features as the basic 16, when really it's an iPhone SE with only some (substantial) upgrades. SE series buyers knew (at least most of them) that they weren't getting Magsafe, Ultrawideband, etc., and so Apple expects new customers for what was the SE series to know this too when they look at the 16e.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theorist9
Thanks, nice to see some actual info on this, even if it's just a regulatory filing. It would also be nice if Apple's spec sheet was specific about confirming this. 29 watts for USB-C charging is a decent upgrade from the SE series' 18 watts using Lightning, if this filing is reflected in the actual manufactured 16e.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MobiusStrip
Who gives a rat's ass why it doesn't have MagSafe wireless? What a boring, pointless debate. Wireless charging is a dumb gimmick, and if you haven't realized that by now... you're just serving as a tool. How many times do we have to point out that there's still a wire running to the charging pad, so it might as well be a cradle that you can plop your phone into and charge it directly. That would be faster and doesn't waste space inside the phone for inductors.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.