Exactly…if it sells well, all my bloviating is moot. Such is the world of supply and demand and savvy marketing.The proof will be in the sales, no matter how any person feels about the price to value ratio it will be the sales.
Exactly…if it sells well, all my bloviating is moot. Such is the world of supply and demand and savvy marketing.The proof will be in the sales, no matter how any person feels about the price to value ratio it will be the sales.
We do care about the speed. If I was terribly worried about battery life through the first two years of having a 2022 iPhone SE, I probably wouldn't have had it. It isn't awful, but it's not really better than the iPhone 8 and it certainly depends on how efficient their (not there) programming is.😂 SE crowd don’t care about fast processor speed or AirDrop or keyless entry or modem speed. They do care about Battery 🔋 life and most bang for there buck and that is just what the 16e offers exactly.
Yeah, you'd think that if Apple was going toNo MagSafe.
No Qi2.
Why would anyone think Apple would "at least upgrade the..." whatever in their lowest end phone?Yeah, you'd think that if Apple was going to drop Magsafe in the 16e, they'd at least upgrade the wireless charging to Qi2.
My argument is that those features that Apple left out (MagSafe, UWB) should be part of the BOM. For all their iPhones going forward. MagSafe is being touted an integral part of the Qi2 standard that Apple itself is pushing, but yet when the opportunity to include it in their new entry level iPhone is presented, they whiff, leaving Accessories monies on the table. The UWB and its precision finding is a competitive advantage in selling Watches, AirTags and AirPods along with some of its other functions and anything HomeKit-related, which is a market that Apple supposedly is going to try and enter to increase revenue and market penetration as the entire of HomeKit seems to be a bit of a mish mash.
The argument is Apple is upselling everyone to the iPhone 16, which may or may not be true as they just jacked up the cost $170 over the previous model, which it seems dubious that people are simply going to say, screw it, let’s just spend another $200 on the iPhone 16.
The phone isn’t gimped, hate that word, but it’s an incredibly mediocre value and more of a pricing experiment for Apple. I just think those two extra features would have helped it be a better value for those entry level buyers who are already getting a price hike to boot.
It was probably cost-cutting move to take out MagSafe Qi2 and Ultra Wideband, but I bet they will be in the next “e” model 3-4 years from now.I'm not sure if this was driven by cost-cutting or product differentiation (or both).
To better speculate about this, it would help if we had an estimate of how much MagSafe actually adds to the BOM.
Because the SE models do not have MagSafe. This was expected. This is not a feature that was dropped. The SE3 did not have MagSafe.So, why does the iPhone 16e lack MagSafe? Apple has not disclosed its actual reasoning, but we would wager that it simply comes down to pricing considerations.
The giant ants that were the result of Atomic bomb testing.You know...THEM
Apple seemingly values apple intelligence over MagSafe. And if the $200 is a sticking point people will shop elsewhere.It was probably cost-cutting move to take out MagSafe Qi2 and Ultra Wideband, but I bet they will be in the next “e” model 3-4 years from now.
If Apple wanted to differentiate they could’ve just said no Apple Intelligence and no 8gb Ram on the 16e. So if you want AI gotta get the the 16 standard at minimum. Pony up that extra $200 for that trillion dollar company 🍎
I think, given their push for AI, that they'd prefer not to differentiate phones on that basis, if possible (even though they did it on the iPhone 15 vs. 15 Pro, probably because of the difference in RAM).It was probably cost-cutting move to take out MagSafe Qi2 and Ultra Wideband, but I bet they will be in the next “e” model 3-4 years from now.
If Apple wanted to differentiate they could’ve just said no Apple Intelligence and no 8gb Ram on the 16e. So if you want AI gotta get the the 16 standard at minimum. Pony up that extra $200 for that trillion dollar company 🍎
Yep as there heavily investing in and pushing hard in Apple Intelligence they were forced to put it in the 16e. They know from the SE 3 that MagSafe can be easily implemented by a 3rd party case, so that’s a easy fix solution and cost cutting that can be easily done.Apple seemingly values apple intelligence over MagSafe. And if the $200 is a sticking point people will shop elsewhere.
Here are my ideas on why no MagSafe and more thoughts:
1. Folks looking to upgrade from anything iPhone 12 and up might already have MagSafe accessories, in that case they will want to stay with the 16/16 Pro to protect their investment/experienxe.
2. iPhone 16e price may have tariff costs built into the price. When everything else will have to go up in price the 16e will be the most affordable option that doesn’t have to scale up.
3. Features the C1 modem/chip and that gets a bunch of the phone out in the market for real world testing. Also gets more folks on Apple Intelligence.
4. Another thing I’ll call out is that most people use their phones simply and if you want the most features of a toolset (smartphone) you buy the the flagships. But most Android buyers according to Android Authority bought a $150 Samsung A15 4G in 2024. Same statistics posted show iPhone 15 Pro Max $1199 sold the most units in 2024. Even with that most folks don’t know how to use their tools. But point is Apple is offering a $599 iPhone not a $150 phone. What would that even look like? Just checked on eBay (2.23.2025) folks will pay ~$189 for a used original iPhone 😮.
![]()
Apple iPhone (1st Generation) - 8 GB - Black (Unlocked) for sale online | eBay
Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Apple iPhone (1st Generation) - 8 GB - Black (Unlocked) at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!www.ebay.com
Yup. I think many of us have been looking at Apple adding "16" to the model number for this iPhone, and that's led us to think that it should've had all the same basic features as the basic 16, when really it's an iPhone SE with only some (substantial) upgrades. SE series buyers knew (at least most of them) that they weren't getting Magsafe, Ultrawideband, etc., and so Apple expects new customers for what was the SE series to know this too when they look at the 16e.Because the SE models do not have MagSafe. This was expected. This is not a feature that was dropped. The SE3 did not have MagSafe.
Thanks, nice to see some actual info on this, even if it's just a regulatory filing. It would also be nice if Apple's spec sheet was specific about confirming this. 29 watts for USB-C charging is a decent upgrade from the SE series' 18 watts using Lightning, if this filing is reflected in the actual manufactured 16e.![]()
iPhone 16e Supports USB-C Fast Charging up to 29W, Based on Chinese Regulatory Filing
The iPhone 16e reportedly supports USB-C fast charging up to 29W, according to a regulatory filing published in China (via MySmartPrice). If...www.macrumors.com