Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,875
38,560


Apple is working on new chips that are destined for smart glasses that would compete with Meta's Ray-Bans, reports Bloomberg. The chip is in development now, with Apple targeting mass production in 2026 or 2027 for a launch in the next two years or so.

meta-ray-bans.jpg

The Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses do not have augmented reality capabilities, but are equipped with a camera and AI functionality. Apple has been considering a competitor for at least a year, and has apparently decided to move forward with development.

Apple's smart glasses will include cameras, microphones, and integrated AI, much like the Ray-Bans from Meta, and they would presumably have similar functions like snapping photos, recording video, and offering translation options. Apple could also integrate a Visual Intelligence-like feature for scanning the environment and describing objects, looking up information about products, and providing directions. The glasses will have multiple cameras included, so they could also potentially record spatial video.

The chip that Apple is designing for the smart glasses is based on chips that are used in the Apple Watch. These SoCs use less energy than the chips in devices like the iPhone, and Apple has already optimized it to improve power efficiency.

While Apple is designing the Ray-Ban like glasses to compete with Meta, it is still working on augmented reality glasses, but that product will not be ready for some time.

Article Link: Apple Designing Chips for Smart Glasses That Rival Meta Ray-Bans
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
I don't know if glasses like this (Apple, Meta, etc.) would have the capability, or if they would need to have more augmented reality features, but a device that allows for AI-powered live translation of written matter, signs, maps, names of streets and subway stations, etc. would be a boon to travelers if it meant they wouldn't have to stop what they're doing and point a phone at something.
 
Those Meta Ray-Ban glasses are creepy, but it’s no surprise considering that Mark Zuckerberg is creepy. When Zuckerberg was a student at Harvard in 2003, he made a website called Facemash (which was a precursor to Facebook) that showed pairs of photos of female students from Harvard's online ID directories, and asked users to choose which one was "hotter." Those photos were used without consent.
 
Last edited:
I really think trying to rush out glasses is a bad idea. It’s too early for the category. This will result in a flop and look bad for Apple. Let Meta fall down flat one their face. Only 2 million Meta Ray Bans have been sold since 2023 and who knows how often they are actually worn and used the way they are intended. This is a mistake. 2029 or 2030 should be the goal to release. Get the AI right first and keep working on miniaturization.
 
Last edited:
I no longer trust Apple to deliver groundbreaking technology that captivates us. Once known for innovations that left us in awe, they now consistently lag behind, outpaced by competitors. It’s clear a $2.9 trillion company is struggling with AI. Fresh leadership is urgently needed to restore their edge.
 
I hope Apple’s glasses look much cooler than Meta’s boring glasses. It is boring to make ‘connected and recording’ glasses look like average everyday glasses and make it very apparent to third parties when cameras and/or microphones are recording.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: ipedro and peterdev
Those Meta Ray-Ban glasses are creepy, but it’s no surprise considering that Mark Zuckerberg is creepy. When Zickerberg was a student at Harvard in 2003, he made a website called Facemash (which was a precursor to Facebook) that showed pairs of photos of female students from Harvard's online ID directories, and asked users to choose which one was "hotter." Those photos were used without consent.
Thank you for reiterating the plot of "The Social Network."
 
These are what I'm interested in. Vision Pro is the tech demo for a subset of people. These have the potential for wipe adoption.
 
Those Meta Ray-Ban glasses are creepy, but it’s no surprise considering that Mark Zuckerberg is creepy. When Zickerberg was a student at Harvard in 2003, he made a website called Facemash (which was a precursor to Facebook) that showed pairs of photos of female students from Harvard's online ID directories, and asked users to choose which one was "hotter." Those photos were used without consent.
Sounds like a movie.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Remember the uproar when Google glass first became a thing because of the privacy concerns about them having a video camera on them? Businesses were even sticking up signs saying “No Google Glass permitted on the premises” etc

Now Meta has this and Apple is on about doing theirs and nobody seems to care.
 
Yeah, so, uh, how about anti-smart glasses glasses? Lasers to seek out those always on in-my-face cameras? It's disconcerting how easily we as humans are giving up on privacy. For all I care we ban those spying eyes forever.

Would be cool though! 😜
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
I no longer trust Apple to deliver groundbreaking technology that captivates us. Once known for innovations that left us in awe, they now consistently lag behind, outpaced by competitors. It’s clear a $2.9 trillion company is struggling with AI. Fresh leadership is urgently needed to restore their edge.
What Apple are you remembering? Apple's strength hasnt ever been "first to market", it's been, at least since they got reverse bought by NeXT and Jobs was back, "in a category where things already exist but arent living up their potential deliver an excellent refined consumer ready product that's better than the competition with most of the rough edges shaved off, and even if it remains niche keep working on it as long as it remains useful to at least the ecosystem or profitable". They also tend to exit markets they feel they can't do that in anymore (like airport routers, which there wasnt anything like them on the market at the time and Apple decided to give WiFi a shove with a refined set of routers/APs, expecially since they were betting on it becoming a big part of the selling point of newer laptops, which they were very much right about).

Has been true of the pmps (ipod), smartphones, earphones, tablets, wifi routers, smart watches, media boxes, even displays (the XDR doesnt really have many competitors in its direct class) and on internals CPUs and other silicon. Hell, it's even true of the AVP, there isnt a VR/AR competitor that comes close to touching it, the problem there is price and killer apps.

That's also what I'm expecting with a folding phone for instance, they wont be first but it will likely be the first one to really iron out the kinks in the tech, plus Apple's strength with the iPad means folding out into a small tablet will have the best implementation of the tablet mode end of things right off the bat

To go back to AI in your comment for a sec, 2 things:

1) Apple's been ahead of the curve on machine learning for a long time, which is what AI is. Apple just hasnt been calling it AI. There's a lot of what other companies are calling AI subtly built in and working well in Apple's products, and have been for a long time. They're probably actually the best company on this around in general consumer products, they just hadnt been touting it as AI

2) on Chatbots specifically while Siri's definitely had its problems that need addressing the problem Apple really has in terms of matching current LLM chatbots is they dont harvest data the way competitors do, and I'll take a dumber assistant over surveilance any day.

I'm also not convinced that this particular use of AI is actually something most people are clammoring for. For one thing modern LLMs still hallucinate *way* too much to be reliable sources of information. Siri can handle my smart devices, shopping list, music, reminders, hands free texting, can answer basic questions (spelling, math, weather, etc), and timers etc just fine. That's the stuff most people want out of such things. There's a reason amazon, microsoft, and google have struggled to get traction with their assistants, and being "AI ready" isnt driving sales on PCs and phones
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: gusmula and cardfan
Think Apple will announce it in 2027 along with the 20th anniversary iPhone. Waiting to see Apple's take on AR glasses. The AR glasses have a potential to be a big success unlike Vision Pro
The Vision Pro is a prosumer product; mainstream sales isn’t the goal of such a product.

There has yet to be a prosumer standalone headset to succeed it or claim to be better at a cheaper price.

The target audience of such hardware doesn’t care or need it to: That’s the same exact case for the Macbook Pro, iPad Pro, Mac Pro, Mac Studio, iPhone Pro, the rumored iPhone foldable, and Apple’s other flagship prosumer products.

That’s the case of prosumer hardware in general: 5090, Canon/Sony/Panasonic DSLRs, and even EVs (Porsche Teycan)

You think someone who buys any of these things are concerned about the mainstream suales and reverence of such things?

No.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.