Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,562
40,739


Apple today outlined changes that it is making to the App Store for users and developers located in Texas to comply with the state's App Store Accountability Act (SB2420).

iOS-App-Store-General-Feature-Desaturated.jpg

Starting on January 1, 2026, Apple users located in Texas will need to confirm whether they are 18 years or older when creating an Apple account. Apple Accounts for users under 18 will be required to join a Family Sharing group, and parents will need to provide consent for all App Store downloads, app purchases, and in-app transactions.

Developers will also need to make changes to their apps to comply with the law. To assist developers, Apple plans to update the Declared Age Range API to provide the required age categories for new account users in Texas. Apple is also creating APIs that will let developers invoke a system experience to allow the user to request that parental consent be re-obtained. Parents will also be able to revoke consent to prevent a minor from using an app.

Apple has been fighting against age assurance requirements in Texas and other states like Utah and Louisiana, because of the data collection required to determine user age. Apple says that SB2420 will force users to share personally identifiable information to download apps.
While we share the goal of strengthening kids' online safety, we are concerned that SB2420 impacts the privacy of users by requiring the collection of sensitive, personally identifiable information to download any app, even if a user simply wants to check the weather or sports scores. Apple will continue to provide parents and developers with industry-leading tools that help enhance child safety while safeguarding privacy within the constraints of the law.
Apple CEO Tim Cook reportedly contacted Texas Governor Greg Abbott to ask him to veto the legislation, but Abbott was not persuaded and he signed the act into law in May.

In an attempt to head off child protection laws that vary from state to state, Apple introduced new child safety measures at the beginning of 2025. Apple created an updated age rating system, added a simpler way for parents to set up child accounts, made changes to what kids see on the App Store, and developed the Declared Age Range API to provide a privacy-focused way for developers to confirm the age range of app users.

Apple's Declared Age Range API prevents apps from having specific information about children, such as their date of birth. Apple has continually said that it does not want to collect information like date of birth at the App Store level because all users would need to hand over that information regardless of whether they want to use an age limited app.

SB2420 requires app store platforms to "use a commercially reasonable method of verification" to determine a user's age during account creation. Texas does not define what a commercially reasonable method of verification entails, and Apple hasn't specified how age verification will work.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple Details App Store Changes to Comply With Texas Age Verification Law
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starfia
These laws feel like a solution in search of a problem. Providing an opt-in solution would be fine, but mandating how parents parent just feels like nanny behavior.

As long as folks have to live with ridiculous laws like these, I at least hope there is a blanket / universal "approval" option. The last thing I want is to have to approve a download or purchase anytime my 17 year old wants to download a new weather app or spend $0.99 of his own money on an in-app purchase.
 
I thought the Republican party did not want a nanny state and don’t like big government. But actually, they have been misrepresenting themselves. It’s not that they don’t like nanny state or big government. Rather, they like it when they do it as their confines about what is and isn’t acceptable are different than other political persuations.
 
I thought the Republican party did not want a nanny state and don’t like big government. But actually, they have been misrepresenting themselves. It’s not that they don’t like nanny state or big government. Rather, they like it when they do it as their confines about what is and isn’t acceptable are different than other political persuations.

Literally everything Republicans say is a lie and always has been.
 
We can only hope that it isn't being stored, just like how I can only hope my web activity is not being stored when I have to connect my driver's license to age verification sites to access adult sites now... Hope!

Agreed -- I find it all very concerning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starfia
That destroys innovation and only leads to bureaucracy instead of more great new products. That damn communist gatekeeper EU. We finally have to...

Excuse me?
We're in the US right now?!
In Texas?!!!
The land of the free in the land of free?

Okay, sorry. I'll come in another time....
Do all these accusations against the “evil, diabolical EU” now also apply to Texas, or is that something different?

/s
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.