The fact you included iMac here makes me confused as to whether it's /s or not. Is anybody really here to complain about how thick iMacs are?No one needs a device as thin as Apple's iPad, MacBook, iMac, iPhone.
The fact you included iMac here makes me confused as to whether it's /s or not. Is anybody really here to complain about how thick iMacs are?No one needs a device as thin as Apple's iPad, MacBook, iMac, iPhone.
The fact you included iMac here makes me confused as to whether it's /s or not. Is anybody really here to complain about how thick iMacs are?
Ha ha bloody ha that was funnyLooks like the Apple-is-Doomed circlejerk is going to need some extra courage in the coming months.
A ARM coprocessor would rule, specially to simulate iOS apps in Xcode.
We walk among gods. U r blessed my child.I predicted this not so long ago on this very forum. You're welcome.![]()
Why it pays to wait.
A lot of 2016 MacBook Pro users - why did I buy this again?
Huh? Forgot your crack pipe today ? The computer is phenomenal.Why it pays to wait.
A lot of 2016 MacBook Pro users - why did I buy this again?
I actually want a thinner MBP. Seriously.
this would be the first step for that and when they do is goodbye apple laptops for me.
Haha you really did; that was propheticdont mean to be that guy but totally called it
https://www.thoughtsonapple.net/sin...Macbooks-and-the-T1-the-most-interesting-part
Except incorporating an ARM chip potentially allows them to incorporate other iOS functionality in the future. If there ever is an 2-in-one Mac (I don't expect it) this is how they would do it.
An iOS mode. Where it takes all your settings and documents and files and music and just transplants it from the desktop equivalents to the mobile equivalents. Yes!!!!!!!!!!! This is what I need.MBPro 2016 = Transitional Product
MBPro 20xx = Fusion Product with x86 and ARM
MBPro 20xx = ARM Product
This is just the transition occurring. Introduce the ARM chip for auxiliary functions as the TouchBar then offload more functions and feature until its takes over completely. It will assist developers to transition as well. I would not be surprised if there was an iOS mode available and this will be Apples answer to the SurfaceBook.
Wow, that's great.I predicted this not so long ago on this very forum. You're welcome.![]()
* also includes a 500 EUR price increase
An iOS mode. Where it takes all your settings and documents and files and music and just transplants it from the desktop equivalents to the mobile equivalents. Yes!!!!!!!!!!! This is what I need.
So Adobe, Autodesk etc. software and applications like Pro Tools would work on an ARM based Mac?What would be wrong with an intermediate switch?
Apple controls its ARM ecosystem, also they have proven with the iPhone 7 that they can deliver computing power.
Also given the fact that the dependency with Intel slows down the MacBook evolution I would say a switch is overdue.
Where you a mac user w ppc? I moved away from windows when they started doing intel and gave Macs a try. Also Vista didn't help w making a decision about windows at that time.Why? If MS and Apple go in that direction in the future on the OS level and still run x86 software in an emulator, and be independent of intel chips someday, what does it matter to you? Shareholder?
Maybe harsh but is what I believe ATM. ARM IMO is not good enough but I'm willing to wait and see if it can prove me wrong.That is a harsh thing to say, ARM processors are powerful and power efficient. With the focus on Swift, and more native written applications, ARM may very well be a contender. It is a wait and see game, why let fear overcome you now as the we are not even there yet.
Of course that won't stop people from writing stories saying how this is absolute proof Apple is ditching Intel for ARM based Macs."Despite Apple's plans to offload some tasks to a new ARM chip, Apple is said to have no intention of abandoning Intel chips in its laptop and desktop computers."
Fake innovation: Focus on low energy efficiency thus requiring smaller batteries thus reducing weight and thickness for greater mobility.
True innovation: Focus on bigger batteries at the cost of weight and thickness.
My MacBook Pro from 2006: 5.6 pounds, an inch thick, 4 hours battery.
MacBook Pro 2016: 3 pounds, 0.59 inches, about 10 hours battery.
Could you imagine what your machine with the new power efficencies would do? You'd have something like 20 hours of battery. Or meet in the middle @ 15 hours. And you'd not notice the difference in weight or size.
It's similar to what HP did with the new Spectre laptops - gave you a great 4k screen and made the thing slightly larger and heavier. You never notice the weight but do notice the gorgeous screen, which at 286ppi beats the Retina Macbook.