Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I absolutely love this. 5 days a week in store is too much, but 5 days a week on your headset taking calls is also too much. A balance would be really good, and also improve the quality of the call center employees knowledge with in-store experience.
 
Apple Store retail sales metrics in 2017 were $5,546 per square foot leading all other retailers, with the number two position being $2,951. Today, fours years later, I wouldn't be shocked if Apple is pulling in much >$6,000 per square foot.

Apple yearly online sales revenue is greater, but the stores have a vital function with respect to brand development and awareness, letting potential customers come in and see products in the flesh, kicking the tires, and then later purchasing online.

Based on the above, and after the pandemic situation totally gets back to normal transitioning in six months or so, there's no way Apple is going to materially change the dynamics of how its stores operate.
 
some of the reps in the stores are not trained. at least well.
I used to do training for new hires at Apple Stores and there is a very simple reason for this.

New hires are first trained on culture (CORE training) - aka brainwashing the Apple kool-aid. This is a 3 day long event. Then they are brought into the stores and work alongside a mentor as a shadow while doing additional workbooks on products.

So, while there is some product training (minimal), most of the onboarding is on culture and sales technique. They figure if they have the right personality, with the right culture, and the right technique and tools, then the product knowledge will come over time. Having seen some hires come in with literally zero Apple knowledge, I can attest to this, however it takes months if not a year + before some of these employees are truly knowledgable. If you get an employee who is relatively new, or was perhaps hired more as a creative, you can sometimes get someone with very little product knowledge.

The technicians (genius) were quite good at repairs, but also had very little product knowledge as they never needed to know much about new products except for how to repair them. Unless of course they were Apple nerds and just loved to learn in their free time.

There are pros and cons to hiring like this, but overall I think it has worked out quite well for Apple Retail.
 
Mate. Most of Apple retail staff are teenagers and collage students who probably don’t care anyway.
Apple Retail very rarely hires teenagers (in one of the stores I worked at with 200 employees we had 1 person under the age of 20.) They do have a decent chunk of college students, but a surprising amount of those people end up staying with the company. The median age is higher than you think. A good quarter of one of my old stores had master's degrees (in mostly useless subjects.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cycom and ohio.emt
I used to do training for new hires at Apple Stores and there is a very simple reason for this.

New hires are first trained on culture (CORE training) - aka brainwashing the Apple kool-aid. This is a 3 day long event. Then they are brought into the stores and work alongside a mentor as a shadow while doing additional workbooks on products.

So, while there is some product training (minimal), most of the onboarding is on culture and sales technique. They figure if they have the right personality, with the right culture, and the right technique and tools, then the product knowledge will come over time. Having seen some hires come in with literally zero Apple knowledge, I can attest to this, however it takes months if not a year + before some of these employees are truly knowledgable. If you get an employee who is relatively new, or was perhaps hired more as a creative, you can sometimes get someone with very little product knowledge.

The technicians (genius) were quite good at repairs, but also had very little product knowledge as they never needed to know much about new products except for how to repair them. Unless of course they were Apple nerds and just loved to learn in their free time.

There are pros and cons to hiring like this, but overall I think it has worked out quite well for Apple Retail.
interesting read, thanks) yea, there are also people who aren't knowledgeable and rude at the same time and that's the worst combo. throw in lazy and i'm fuming. oh, and slow af. i recently went in for a quick repair, and i spent 2.5 the amount of time i was expecting to. everyone was moving about the store so calmly, i felt like i was in a museum. i'm not saying people need to run, but move at the normal speed, damn it))
 
Employees should be on alert whenever a company, even Apple, uses the “culture” argument, as a reason against work from home. It’s really just about control in most scenarios.

Same with the fantasy that your work colleagues are “like your family”. Some, probably. Most, not at all. It doesn’t mean you can’t work together effectively, but that simply is not a realistic relationship expectation.
 
Employees should be on alert whenever a company, even Apple, uses the “culture” argument, as a reason against work from home. It’s really just about control in most scenarios.

Same with the fantasy that your work colleagues are “like your family”. Some, probably. Most, not at all. It doesn’t mean you can’t work together effectively, but that simply is not a realistic relationship expectation.

No, it's really about maintaining/increasing Apple's supremely high retail store sales metrics, creating a customer focused environment that fosters that goal.
 
Last edited:
I worked at Apple for 10 years and would love a flexible option. This is pretty cool to me, but I know a lot of current employees who hate the RCC (WFH) or AHA options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CYB3RBYTE
Employees should be on alert whenever a company, even Apple, uses the “culture” argument, as a reason against work from home. It’s really just about control in most scenarios.

Same with the fantasy that your work colleagues are “like your family”. Some, probably. Most, not at all. It doesn’t mean you can’t work together effectively, but that simply is not a realistic relationship expectation.
I really like the people I work with, but it's true; they're not family. They're coworkers! Which is a *positive* relationship; I like having them in my life. But we rarely talk outside of work and that's perfectly okay.

Unlike family and friends.
 
Being in the office is not about having more of that idle chit-chat.

I am involved in high-tech industry, and it is easy to see innovations require social contacts between people. While introvert development engineers loved to keep at home in the beginning, the lack of novel innovations has become more and more visible. Meeting people means exchanging ideas, and new things happen at intersections.

Of course, if everyone is in their cubicle with their headphones on, it is no different from being elsewhere. And, yes, there may be bad culture in the office, where chit-chatters are spending their and everyone else's time. But if you really want to create something new, you need to have people meeting other people. Also, negotiations tend to be easier and quicker IRL vs. online meetings, as building trust is not that simple in virtual meetings (no body language, easy to miss tone, more difficult to understand what people say).

Sometimes people are very efficient when working at home. However, this comes with a price tag in many cases. Senior specialists are happy, because they can concentrate on their work without nobody interrupting. The flipsaide is that juniors do not get the support and do not become specialists.

I am not against WFH. I have been doing it for over two decades, and even before this spiky little bugger sent everyone home I spent more than half of my working time at home. Still, I am very skeptical towards 100 % WFH. It may be successful in some cases and with some people, but not as a general rule.
It all depends on the team and personality. Everyone is different.

The past 1,5 year working from home has been the most productive, innovative period of my entire 18 year career. I have worked with more colleagues and external partner together on projects than ever before. My teams are also working better than ever before. Never have we realised so many successful projects in such a small period because we could have laser focus and efficiency. People were easier to reach and I seem to be way a much better presenter and project leader virtually than on site.

I can skip all the fake smiles, office politics, hiding so I can eat 5 minutes in peace and no sweaty ears from wearing headphones all days. I just love to work at work and working from home has really brought out the best in me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newyorksole
They really need to improve the impression that no one is available to help in a jiffy, appts are all booked up to do virtually anything (on the sales side) but when you look around, it seems like 10 people gossiping in a circle looking at their iPad doing nothing.

And yes, if you keep observing them, most of them don't diffuse from the circle and continue to just stand there with a blank stare after a few minutes.

They ought to care more about the brand and perception, even if their success is locked in. Its just cheesy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cycom
If anything good came out of the pandemic, it’s new ways of working that some (unfortunately a few) companies found to keep people employed and working remote or changing up to hybrid set ups like this.

The company I work for is a big company and the week of shutdowns in March 2020 they got the like 98% of the company workforce worldwide moved to remote working in 3 days with the rest within two weeks later. We’ve been doing it ever since and now moving to new models of working remote or not or both. It’s a welcome change.
 
Last edited:
It all depends on the team and personality. Everyone is different.

This is key. Everyone is different and work better under different circumstances - we are human after all!

One thing above all else - the pandemic has forced companies to show them multiple works modes can exist and the company won't fall apart. Never again can a boss fudge up excuses on why WFH is not allowed or good for the company.

Timing is also key - if Covid hit us back in 1998 dial up internet would have killed us...not covid!
 
I have seen a lot of people who say a lot of hogwash about Apple in this thread.

I have worked from home for Apple for 7 years. And during the pandemic the store workers that chose to work from home for the most part loved it, and do would prefer to keep doing it, and while they were not as knowledgable in IOS or MACos, they learned, and I was highly impressed with their energy and willingness to be mentored but us senior advisors.

If you get someone on the phone on the front lines who does not know what they are doing then it is from an outside agency that is outsourced to. We literally have not hired front line workers in several years, but have outsourced them. All of us tenured guys are in senior support.

99.9% of problems that are not hardware related do not warrant a trip to the Apple store but can be handled efficiently and quickly over the phone. But people insist on going to the store because their email does not work or they need help in Pages.

The guys in the stores are not the ones who sit and solve OS problems day in and out or have the access to the engineers. It is Applecare. A 10 minute phone call can resolve an issue much better than you getting an appointment and waiting in the store because you forgot your Apple ID.

Ironically most people do not realize that for the last decade Apple has had a huge at home work force.

If you were hired to work in the store, you can apply to transfer to AHA, and vice versa. But you cannot just decide that you want to split it up. That is not how it works.
 
Local store here looks like a fish market most days. During the pandemic you had to make an appointment AND wait in line.
Same where I am as well. I don’t doubt that affected store performance too. Speaking personally, the line ups were enough to drive me to online-only purchases from Apple. I doubt I’m the only one.
 
Training is the key here. Some of those retail reps were clearly not trained when they took calls from home last year.
I wonder how do we know that consumers are actually getting actual Apple employees on the phone? For all we know, the first line are just outsourced contact center in some developing country.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: fahlman
That Apple Store looks so empty, hardy a soul around. Maybe Apple ought to go to an all-remote model where they don't have brick and mortar stores anymore and everything is done on-line.
At how many Apple Stores have you sampled the foot traffic and at what times during the day did you collect your data to form this highly scientific opinion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Krizoitz
At how many Apple Stores have you sampled the foot traffic and at what times during the day did you collect your data to form this highly scientific opinion?
Maybe you failed to read my post? I said "That Apple Store", not "All Apple Stores". As far as my data, I pulled that out of my ass, like most posters on this forum.

This was really meant to be a dig at those whiney Apple employees that sent Tim the letter about how they're going to hold their breath until they turn blue if he doesn't cave and let them continue to work remote 100% of the time.
 
I’m the director of production for a promotional company printing, assembling and selling tech-related merchandise (popgrips for phones, high-capacity USB drives, back-up batteries, etc—-if we can print on it or engrave it, we do it). Prior to Covid affecting the availability of the merchandise we were buying from (as luck would have it) Wuhan and other factories in Guandong region of China, and then the following 18 months of the pandemic affecting everything else in Seattle, we reduced our production staff from over 100, working 24/7, to 15 people working 9A to 5P, Monday through Friday. The sales and service people, art department and the other people who did non-production work were also reduced in number, and were allowed to work from home—-if they wanted. All but one took that option. Now we’re getting back to full capacity, and the production team are very happy to return to work. We made it clear to the other staff, though: you could be here Monday through Friday before the pandemic, so please plan on resuming your on-site work again, effective 1 September. I was happy the president/CEO made that decision, since we’ve been all about equality and equity from the start. A few of the office people took great umbrage with life returning to normal for the company and the expectation that everyone plays on the same team, turning in either immediate or eventual notices that they’re quitting their jobs. With the great availability of people in Seattle, I don’t foresee a challenge getting the positions filled quickly. Who wouldn’t like quarterly profit-sharing bonuses, up to four weeks PTO, 11 paid holidays, bringing your four-legged furries to work, tuition compensation and four blow-out company events every year? Well, apparently those who find commuting “gross” (a quote), and apparently a wealth of other better opportunities elsewhere. We’ll miss them, but we welcome a work environment of equity and inclusion for all workers.
It’s true: one can’t please everyone all the time, but efforts can be made to be fair to everyone, whenever possible.
Your office does sound nice—especially the part about allowing pets. It’s fair to expect people to come to the office if they did prior to the pandemic and some roles benefit from in person interaction. However, there are some benefits to society by allowing at least a portion of your staff to work from home. The main one being fewer people burning fossil fuels in traffic getting to and from work every day. It was nothing short of amazing how quickly the earth started to recover without so much human activity.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.