How would Apple be considered anti-competitive in this case? They are not preventing other companies from developing or selling hardware. Nor are they selling any of their chips, so they are not using their size to force other companies out of the market.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Developing In-House Modem That Will Eventually Replace Qualcomm Chips
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
How would Apple be considered anti-competitive in this case? They are not preventing other companies from developing or selling hardware. Nor are they selling any of their chips, so they are not using their size to force other companies out of the market.
I wouldn't be surprised if they buy GlobalFoundries to eventually make their own chips in-house as well.
How is that anti-competitive? There’s absolutely no requirement that you have to buy parts from someone else instead of making them yourself. That’s simply not a thing. They aren’t even competing with Intel or qualcomm when they do that.
i would be somewhat surprised. There’s a reason all of the most successful chipmakers do not own fabs. I mean, they don’t even own Foxconn, for the same reasons.
One thing I do expect them to be thinking about next is imaging sensors.
Intel sold their modem chip business because the ROI was bad. Why continue to invest in something that's making little to no money?
The initial plan was to use a 5G modem that was designed by Intel but Intel couldn't deliver. Intel had many problems bringing that modem to market. As a result, Apple signed a six-year deal with Qualcomm (short-term plan to bring 5G capability to iPhones), acquired Intel's modem division and are now developing their own modem.
I wonder what the implications (if any) this has on security and location tracking with cellular usages. Just as Intel chips were less secure for apple devices than an M1, will apple cellular chips be more secure than Qualcomm?
is current location tracking by ISP’s based on towers and calls being done irrespective of the chip in the phone (triangulation from towers etc?) or does the chip have a say in what data can be interpreted by the ISP? Interesting to know if someone in that field could share
is current location tracking by ISP’s based on towers and calls being done irrespective of the chip in the phone (triangulation from towers etc?) or does the chip have a say in what data can be interpreted by the ISP? Interesting to know if someone in that field could share
Apple is not a company that sells to competitors. It sells to customers.
It’s about time they addressed it. They spent all the money on Intel’s business and we hadn’t heard jack.
Unless you are a stock holder I'm not seeing how that matters. And I'm not sure it even matters if you are.
One thing I like about this is that we are finally back at seeing a product that has a brand name completely/mostly built by the brand owner. Almost all modern products are a collection of products from different manufacturers that is customised by the brand owner.
For example, the Sony Playstation 5 probably has nothing Sony in it except the BD drive...maybe.
Why not? Samsung is selling screens to Apple for their iPhones. It will make Apple even more money.
For example, the Sony Playstation 5 probably has nothing Sony in it except the BD drive...maybe.
Why not? Samsung is selling screens to Apple for their iPhones. It will make Apple even more money.
nothing really new in this article, and the essence is: it will take years for Apple to build competitive modems ...
finance.yahoo.com
Apple’s Greatest Chip Challenge Yet: Replacing Qualcomm Modems
Mark Gurman and Ian KingApple’s Greatest Chip Challenge: Replacing Qualcomm Modems
(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. has become a chip powerhouse in the past decade, beating some of the semiconductor industry’s leading companies at their own game. But the iPhone maker is embarking on its biggest challenge to date as it tries to replace Qualcomm Inc. cellular modems with its own...
The more i see this, the more i think Apple wanting to break ties with the major chip makers, Some like they just can't do themselves in-house.. (possible screens for iPhone), luckily high prices stands in their way.. to prevent major companies... (aka... They will alwas have Foxconn or other related Taiwanese companies)
Wonder if they buy Sharp or somebody to move displays/batteries in-house. I’d assume the end goal is to be 100% vertical.
Most DRAM is a commodity, yes. But Apple has an unusual memory architecture. Does commodity DRAM offer the ideal design to work with it? Or might Apple benefit from a customized in-house design—one optimized to integrate synergistically with that architecture? Perhaps a specialized variant of HBM memory, say, or maybe an entirely different design.
Sure, it would likely cost more for Apple to do this than to buy off-the-shelf RAM. But Apple, with its premium prices, has the flexibility to pay for premium components, if they provide a significant performance boost.
The "barrier to entry" into the market would only apply if Apple wanted to compete on price/performance in producing commodity RAM that it then planned to sell into the general market. But neither of those would apply to the RAM Apple would build for itself (it's not going to be commodity RAM, and they're not going to be competing for RAM sales, b/c they're not going to be supplying it to anyone but themselves).
Apple only uses premium components as a last resort, unless visible/touchable
As for modems, don’t fool yourself into believing M1 is indicative of what they can do in this area. Patent system is a sham, just look at the BS Apple gets granted on a regular basis with no detail on how to actualise, very broad. With QC’s portfolio of patents, Apple will have to pony up for licences.
They would be better off ditching 5g, it’s a joke, and optimising 4g
Nope, Apple's laptops have had some of the fastest SSDs in the business. This was particularly true during the early days of SSDs, when Apple used SSD components that put their laptops well ahead of nearly everyone else's. This certainly cost them more, but they did it because it gave them a clear lead in performance. And their decision to do this was the opposite of a "last resort", since they could have instead simply done what pretty much everyone else did, which was to use less expensive standard-grade components.
There's no reason why they wouldn't do the same with custom memory, if it also gave them a big performance boost relative to the increased cost.
[If you want to make a broad generalization about what constrains Apple from using the fanciest components in its laptops, it's this: Apple only uses top-end components in its laptops when they're not too big and don't consume too much power. That's what keeps them from using the fastest video processors (well, that and their conflict with NVIDIA), as well as 4k screens.]
Not sure what you're responding to here, since I never mentioned modems, just RAM.
Last edited:
Pre-COVID, atsc3 was to have major rollouts throughout large numbers of US cities ... that did get rolled back ... and the lack of hardware producers has curtailed this rollout ... I agree, 3rd or 4th quarter 2021 it’ll be heavily broadcasting ...
atsc 3 brings a worldwide uniform standard ... it debuted inter Seoul summer olympics ... its adoption has been turtle slow