App Rating system: rated FAIL
Apple has to really step back and critically assess its rating system, because right now, it appears to be missing the point - which would be to alert parents to potentially objectionable content.
Example: I recently downloaded an app that provides critical reviews of wines. It was rated 17+ for "frequent reference to alcohol" or some such idiocy.
You might as well rate an anatomy handbook program 17+ because it's got information on human anatomy (I'm shocked!).
While I don't see why a 12 year old would really want a program that contains information on wine, I can't see how it does them ANY harm at all. Hell, if a kid's going to drink, at least let them drink quality products, rather than Boone's Farm or Thunderbird.
Apple has to really step back and critically assess its rating system, because right now, it appears to be missing the point - which would be to alert parents to potentially objectionable content.
Example: I recently downloaded an app that provides critical reviews of wines. It was rated 17+ for "frequent reference to alcohol" or some such idiocy.
You might as well rate an anatomy handbook program 17+ because it's got information on human anatomy (I'm shocked!).
While I don't see why a 12 year old would really want a program that contains information on wine, I can't see how it does them ANY harm at all. Hell, if a kid's going to drink, at least let them drink quality products, rather than Boone's Farm or Thunderbird.