accumulator
macrumors newbie
App Rating system: rated FAIL
Apple has to really step back and critically assess its rating system, because right now, it appears to be missing the point - which would be to alert parents to potentially objectionable content.
Example: I recently downloaded an app that provides critical reviews of wines. It was rated 17+ for "frequent reference to alcohol" or some such idiocy.
You might as well rate an anatomy handbook program 17+ because it's got information on human anatomy (I'm shocked!).
While I don't see why a 12 year old would really want a program that contains information on wine, I can't see how it does them ANY harm at all. Hell, if a kid's going to drink, at least let them drink quality products, rather than Boone's Farm or Thunderbird. 😉
Apple has to really step back and critically assess its rating system, because right now, it appears to be missing the point - which would be to alert parents to potentially objectionable content.
Example: I recently downloaded an app that provides critical reviews of wines. It was rated 17+ for "frequent reference to alcohol" or some such idiocy.
You might as well rate an anatomy handbook program 17+ because it's got information on human anatomy (I'm shocked!).
While I don't see why a 12 year old would really want a program that contains information on wine, I can't see how it does them ANY harm at all. Hell, if a kid's going to drink, at least let them drink quality products, rather than Boone's Farm or Thunderbird. 😉