I think you're reading a different tone into my comments than I'm putting into them. I'm only speaking for myself here, and I won't claim to know the economics of independent music. I, like most, have finite resources so I'm forced to make decisions about where to focus them. If Apple decided to drop their Plus prices it is probably because they believe lower prices will bring higher volume. That might be true, but for me it hasn't crossed the threshold yet where my buying habits will change. For most of the music I buy now, I know I want it and I tend to buy it as albums-- so my demand is rather inelastic and the price hasn't really changed for me in any event.
If the price came down further, I'd explore more, and buy more music that I don't find as necessary. I don't know that I'm typical, but in my case that would tend to benefit new and independent artists, and artists in genres I'm less devoted to. Whether the added revenue from people like me would offset the loss in revenue from diehard fans is a decision someone else needs to make.
What I'm expressing isn't about entitlement. I don't think I deserve special privilege here. This is about value. What this music is worth to me. This is a market where buyer and seller need to decide on a price. If the price is higher than the value I place on the item, I have no music and the seller has less revenue.
Thanks for the link BTW.