Our echo just sits in a corner, unplugged as I don’t want it listening. I have no idea what to do with it, can’t figure out how it enhances my life or makes it easier. Just one more thing I have to figure out in an already busy life. Ymmv.I think price does have a lot to do with it when the HomePod is more than triple the price of the Echo. I’ve got three myself and one thing is clear and Amazon are way ahead of Apple with voice recognition. I get far less issues than I do with Siri on my iPhone or Apple Watch. I think Apple were late to the market and the price just hasn’t worked due to being uncompetitive.
The Echo was one of the top selling Christmas presents of the last couple of years and I seriously doubt it would have been as popular if priced at £300-350.
That sort of product is useless to you then much like any other smart assistant. They are much the same, just Apples is hideously expensive compared to its rivals.Our echo just sits in a corner, unplugged as I don’t want it listening. I have no idea what to do with it, can’t figure out how it enhances my life or makes it easier. Just one more thing I have to figure out in an already busy life. Ymmv.
That’s the beauty of choice. I would hope they do sound better at over three times the price. The Echo is perfectly adequate to those of us not studying or comparing and the price means I can have more than one which is good for entertaining friends. If the HomePod was stand out brilliant in its class then we wouldn’t be discussing this as iPhone owners and Amazon and Google wouldn’t be enjoying the market dominance they share.I’d still rather have one HomePod . Echos don’t sound near as good , google only comes close, in sound quality, with the “Max” but that thing is giant and uglier than a bread box. The audio tech packed into these things is amazing. They are well worth it to me. ( I have 2 and paid full price).
Android users and pretty much everyone else says the same thing about Apple.
Except, now that I have an apple music subscription, courtesy of VZW, I could use the dang expensive speaker as a dumb speaker to stream my apple music without interacting with it. Of course I could also do the same with $10 bluetooth speakers, but it probably wouldn't sound the same.That sort of product is useless to you then much like any other smart assistant. They are much the same, just Apples is hideously expensive compared to its rivals.
I know Apple Music has come to the Echo but I already have Amazon music as part of my Prime package so it doesn’t appeal to me. It’s nice to be able to control music from your iPhone and with 3 Echos I sync it between rooms so the sound is pretty good. Whatever works but I doubt any of these smart assistants are hardly or time consuming to work out, even my 2 year old can work it.Except, now that I have an apple music subscription, courtesy of VZW, I could use the dang expensive speaker as a dumb speaker to stream my apple music without interacting with it. Of course I could also do the same with $10 bluetooth speakers, but it probably wouldn't sound the same.
I have sirius xm sat and internet, now apple music. We have prime, so I assume there is some music subscription as well. Sirius has it nailed as far as music for me (although it's compressed) and I'm willing to try AM and see how I like it.I know Apple Music has come to the Echo but I already have Amazon music as part of my Prime package so it doesn’t appeal to me. It’s nice to be able to control music from your iPhone and with 3 Echos I sync it between rooms so the sound is pretty good. Whatever works but I doubt any of these smart assistants are hardly or time consuming to work out, even my 2 year old can work it.
I have sirius xm sat and internet, now apple music. We have prime, so I assume there is some music subscription as well. Sirius has it nailed as far as music for me (although it's compressed) and I'm willing to try AM and see how I like it.
Maybe interacting with smart assistants is the new way, but I find it incredibly annoying and as such don't use google, alexa or siri. I think the homepod has better sound quality than alexa and with airplay 2, the stereo setup sounds amazing, if not expensive.
As I said before, Apple has to open up Homepod. It's incredibly locked down, even for them.
Was it the $20B in profit last quarter that tipped you off to people not liking Apple products anymore? Or the fact HomePod has been out 14 months and Apple dropped the price a mere $50?And more signs that people do not like anymore Apple's overpricing products anymore.
I guess Apple greedy pricing is not flying anymore.
A fair competitive price would be $190.00 NOT $299.00
Especially when Siri is horrendous.
Still way overpriced when you can get Alexa for $125.00-$149.00
[doublepost=1554476607][/doublepost]
It was late to the party and way overpriced. In addition, Siri is terrible. So way pay for something that is more expensive that actually works worse?
If you want plastic junk with below average sound quality, get an echo or a google.
[doublepost=1554383674][/doublepost]It’s a high quality premium speaker. Want to link to a high quality speaker that does what this does at a cheaper price?
No, 533 (Canadian) bucks to you means the same as 400 (US) bucks does to me. Exchange rates are not just a technicality
I mean, yeah it’s CAD$399 but if your Apple store asked you to pay USD$399 you would not be happy.
Similarly, wouldn’t it be nice if you could pay the $299 price from the US Apple Store with 299 Canadian dollars?
CAD$399=USD$299[/QUOTE
We will find out about their "greed" at the next earnings call. My guess, that statement will be proven false. Having said that the problem with the homepod is the lack of openess. Not the price. The speakers themselves sound great. And Siri is not "horrendous" as claimed in the post. Alexa is not worth it, at least to me.
Others here will list as a ‘flop’ now because Apple dropped the price. Anyone that’s experienced the HomePod, knows exactly what this speaker is capable of producing in terms of quality sound. I don’t regret purchasing mine for the Original $350 price point.
I don't even regret buying the HomePod (paid 269GBP on ebay)
The sound is truly awesome. And the bass, oh that bass. (Expensive but) Great product by Apple.
I love apple and would love to have my home product in the ecosystem. I'd do it if their price wasn't 2-3X the competition. Until then, will wait it out with Alexa. Unless Alexa wants to record me eating breakfast I've got no real issue with what it might share. The device can't figure out the weather 1/2 the time so I'm pretty sure my secrets are safe.
Rarely do I speak in my computer room, and when I do it is usually of casual content. If, for some reason, I am speaking of private or business matters, I'll unplug the Echo, which sits about 3 feet from where I sit. When or if I am in some sort of serious discussion, where I value privacy, I likely won't be listening to the Echo - it would be a distraction from my discussion to have it making sound - so simple to unplug it.You never speak in the computer room. Friends never enter it? You don’t use Skype or FaceTime? You don’t think aloud?
So you picked it up at $249 then.
MehThat is still $249.
It took years before the echo was available in so many countries.It’s pretty clear that Apple has never been very serious with the HomePod. After all, 14 months after its release, it’s still only available in a select few countries, while google home and amazon Alexa are omnipresent, almost globally.
Rarely do I speak in my computer room, and when I do it is usually of casual content. If, for some reason, I am speaking of private or business matters, I'll unplug the Echo, which sits about 3 feet from where I sit. When or if I am in some sort of serious discussion, where I value privacy, I likely won't be listening to the Echo - it would be a distraction from my discussion to have it making sound - so simple to unplug it.
Nuance in conversation privacy escapes you? Nothing to do with space or time, just content.You only value privacy in select geographic spaces? Or times? The point of a digital assistant is to be available all the time. Unplugging it and plugging it back in defeats it’s purpose.
Owning two HomePods’ for music first, your statement is, like many here, rather ridiculous.That sort of product is useless to you then much like any other smart assistant. They are much the same, just Apples is hideously expensive compared to its rivals.
Thanks for letting me know.Owning two HomePods’ for music first, your statement is, like many here, rather ridiculous.
You can't have a somewhat balanced sound output from a single speaker inside a room .
Was it the $20B in profit last quarter that tipped you off to people not liking Apple products anymore? Or the fact HomePod has been out 14 months and Apple dropped the price a mere $50?
Huh? Select HomePods as the audio out on the Apple TV. Then AirPlay to the Apple TV. How does that not work?I bought one for $50 off from Target. Love the sound but it is even more limited than I was expecting. I wanted to airplay Peloton workouts to my apple TV and use homepod for sound-- it can't be done.
We don't see this enough on these forums.You know what; fair enough.
Just convert your FLACs to ALAC?No flac playback = no purchase.
What?People who care about sound quality would never consider Apple. No. Just no. Sonos, Bose, and the king of sound: Google. Have you seen how small a HomePod is? Can’t generate good sound. Fact.