Steve is talking awfully fast.
'Ya know I just rewatched the september '06 SE and Steve was talking a mile-a-minute. (I think that was the one I was watching...)
-------
Ooo and more labels coming on board too!
-=|Mgkwho
Steve is talking awfully fast.
Konradx the albums are the same price DRM or DRM free.
How many other audio players, phones, etc, play unprotected AAC? Neither my Treo phone or my GPS (Garmin Nuvi 660) play it...
Converting to MP3 will introduce an element of quality loss.
The key to all this is that it's not MP3. It's AAC. I don't think all players play AAC versions, no?
From press release: $1.29 for premium tracks (DRM-less), $.99 for standard (DRM), and $.30 for upgrade
So albums are same price DRM free..but single tracks cost 30 cents more?
I can't believe Steve Jobs capitulated to higher prices for DRM free. Is that what 84% of consumers asked for? I don't think so.
"$1.29 for premium tracks (DRM-less)". No thanks. I could pay less for a cd, and have much higher quality lossless tracks instead of an increase to 256 kbps. A pass on this one.
A lot of Nokia phones support AAC![]()
From press release: $1.29 for premium tracks (DRM-less), $.99 for standard (DRM), and $.30 for upgrade
So albums are same price DRM free..but single tracks cost 30 cents more?
Brilliant question that guy asked. Why, if they now are so against DRM .. why keep it on the cheaper tracks ??? HA HA HA