Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So instead of simply moving the antenna gap like they did on the 4S the engineers just said it wouldn't work.

Sure, totally Ive's fault. /s
Yes, because Ive was insistent on not changing the design, and Jobs sided with Ive. Apple only went to fix it because, as predicted, the antenna issue was real. Go read the biography.
 
Yes, because Ive was insistent on not changing the design, and Jobs sided with Ive. Apple only went to fix it because, as predicted, the antenna issue was real. Go read the biography.
I don't have to read the biography to know the issue was real; I returned my launch-day 4 and waited for the 4S.

Check out this huge design change. The 4S doesn't even look like the same phone. /s
Screen Shot 2022-07-13 at 11.32.56 AM.png

The phone design was the same, but the iPhone 4S engineers fixed an issue that apparently was unsolvable according to the iPhone 4 engineers.
 
Last edited:
Check out this huge design change. The 4S doesn't even look like the same phone. /s
View attachment 2029415

I don't have to read the biography to know the issue was real; I returned my launch-day 4 and waited for the 4S.

The phone design was the same, but the iPhone 4S engineers fixed an issue that apparently was unsolvable according to the iPhone 4 engineers.
It's not unsolvable. Ive was the one that insistent in keeping the design after the engineers pointed it out.
 
It's not unsolvable. Ive was the one that insistent in keeping the design after the engineers pointed it out.
And the 4S proves that the glass back, perimeter antenna design which Ive wanted to keep wasn't the issue. The issue was with where the iPhone 4 engineers placed the antenna gaps.
 
Or we are expecting too much from our phones, as hardware/features keep getting added.

I think thin will come back if battery tech makes a major leap and chips keep getting a lot more energy efficient. Not sure how much more is left to cram into smartphone feature at this point other than more sophisticated AI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanteHicks79
And the 4S proves that the glass back, perimeter antenna design which Ive wanted to keep wasn't the issue. The issue was with where the iPhone 4 engineers placed the antenna gaps.
THAT was part of the design. Don't you get it? Jobs gave Ive complete power in deciding on how the phone will look.
 
THAT was part of the design. Don't you get it? Jobs gave Ive complete power in deciding on how the phone will look.
Assuming that Ive even decided the precise antenna gaps location, if he was 100% unmovable in his design explain the 4S.

Jobs was too controlling to give Ive complete power at that points, and the idea that Ive had complete power at that point, and was unmovable in his decisions, runs contrary to the idea that they worked as a team balancing each other out.

The reality was that Ive wanted to keep the exposed antenna design but instead of looking for a radical solution like moving the gaps, which would have been acceptable in the same way that they both accepted an easily scratched plastic bottom on the first iPhone because it was good for reception, the engineers threw up their hands and claimed the issue was unsolvable.
 
So instead of simply moving the antenna gap like they did on the 4S the engineers just said it wouldn't work. Sounds like Jobs should have pushed the engineers as hard as he pushed Ive.

Sure, totally Ive's fault. /s

I don't have to read the biography to know the issue was real; I returned my launch-day 4 and waited for the 4S.

Check out this huge design change. The 4S doesn't even look like the same phone. /s
View attachment 2029415

The phone design was the same, but the iPhone 4S engineers fixed an issue that apparently was unsolvable according to the iPhone 4 engineers.

And the 4S proves that the glass back, perimeter antenna design which Ive wanted to keep wasn't the issue. The issue was with where the iPhone 4 engineers placed the antenna gaps.

Unsolvable is different from it won't work; they may even have proposed that solution. It's quite possible that a redesign would push back the release date and Jobs/Ive did not want that so ignored the engineers. It would not be the first time a product was pushed out to meet a deadline only to discover it had problems and the next design fixed the problem.
 
Assuming that Ive even decided the precise antenna gaps location, if he was 100% unmovable in his design explain the 4S.

Jobs was too controlling to give Ive complete power at that points, and the idea that Ive had complete power at that point, and was unmovable in his decisions, runs contrary to the idea that they worked as a team balancing each other out.

The reality was that Ive wanted to keep the exposed antenna design but instead of looking for a radical solution like moving the gaps, which would have been acceptable in the same way that they both accepted an easily scratched plastic bottom on the first iPhone because it was good for reception, the engineers threw up their hands and claimed the issue was unsolvable.
So now you're making up stories.
I tend to believe what was told in the biography.
Have a good day.
 
Unsolvable is different from it won't work; they may even have proposed that solution. It's quite possible that a redesign would push back the release date and Jobs/Ive did not want that so ignored the engineers. It would not be the first time a product was pushed out to meet a deadline only to discover it had problems and the next design fixed the problem.
Unsolvable is "it wont work" which is different for "it wont work but this will". Your other point might be true, but not even "autobiographies" are 100% true. I suspect what happened was that field testing showed the issue but if there want enough time to move the antenna gaps then there wasn't enough time to redesign the entire phone. But to paint it as "Ive's design was responsible" is opportunistic and probably not accurate. I doubt we will ever know for sure.
 
So now you're making up stories.
I tend to believe what was told in the biography.
Have a good day.
Sure man, you read about the issue in book written by Mr. "You're holding it wrong" while I experienced the issue and issue diagnosis first-hand.
 
Last edited:
Until everything is Apple ][e brown again, I will complain!

I have a 2018 MBP which I am handing down to my wife today. The design of the new MBP’s was one of the reasons I decided to upgrade. New processors were a big deal, but getting away from that GOD AWFUL keyboard is a big one.

I hope my wife doesn’t hate it as much as I have. She’s been using my older MBP which has one of the best laptop keyboards I’ve ever used. We’re passing that one along to my step daughter so we can face time with her and the new grandchild more easily. Her husband hogs they’re wintel desktop…
 
thankfully i dont have one any more. i hated it. i always had to have a cheap mouse on my desk as backup for when id not charged the magic mouse and it died mid work/game.
You gamed on a magic mouse? 😲 Surely it's inability to left+right click at the same time made this nigh on impossible for gaming as well as other apps needing multiple L/R clicks at once (and quickly change between scrolling and both types of click and no other buttons as well as the generally horrible ergononics + upside down charging)?

I've been a very big fan of the multi-touch trackpads on the macbooks for years and also have the wireless magic trackpad for general use, but when I wanted an actual mouse I didn't think for a single moment of getting a magic mouse. They're just awful.
 
Johnny Ive's more recent work gave us butterfly keyboards and touch bars. Sometimes, a guy just needs to know when to retire. Glad Apple forced it along before more damage could be done.
Ive's work is best when he was in a duo with Jobs - product vision at its best, design-first mentality, etc.

Ive without Jobs is just going on the same recipes for success, but no product vision to drive it.

Apple without Jobs could not rely only on Ive to make great things happen (other than milking Jobs' legacy) - they just threw money at him to keep going, but he's probably bored to death by now - and he's a billionaire at 55, what does he care anymore?
 
You know, Apple’s products since the Steve Jobs era have had a kind of signature design which was largely responsible for them standing out in a world of boxes. I think its very possible that Apple will go too far the other way without Ive. Sad to see him go.
 
I've read that the Magic Mouse cannot be used while it is charging and that played a role in putting the port on the bottom so people would not try and use it while it was being charged, find it didn't work, and assume the mouse was somehow broken.
That means it should’ve been made to work while charging, not make it harder for users to try using it while charging. If this is really what happened begging the scenes, it’s even MORE idiotic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: madeirabhoy
Tech blog forums are populated by those who don’t care what something looks like. All they care about is specs and benchmarks, not even real world performance. This is born out by what some of their home-assembled concoctions look like, with flashing led’s, black plastic cases, and cooling system hoses hanging out.

So of course a designer like Jony Ive and a visionary like Steve Jobs are anathema to that ilk.
Those are PC forums, not Apple forums.
 
Apple kept him on for optics only.

Nobody enjoyed the butterfly keyboard, port-less MacBook Pro, or small battery capacity iPhones.

It's been a few years and consumers enjoy the new Apple products, which are better designed for practicality. No need for Ive any more.
I did
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.