I'm thinking that for that to work, they'd have to make it so that you log into the Apple TV every time you wake it up, so they know who to count the Screen Time against, since the Apple TV wouldn't know which family member is using it otherwise. Of course, the login screen could be enabled only in the case where both conditions obtain: there are multiple users set up and Screen Time is enabled.Apple, just give us PARENTAL CONTROLS aka Screen Time for this thing already pretty please.
Apple doesn't usually keep a ton of stock on hand. That's part of the whole Just-in-Time manufacturing thing - keep the factory-to-store-shelves pipeline short so you don't have a ton of money tied up in unsold inventory. Caches happen, of course, but ending up with a several month stock of devices on hand is something they've traditionally tried to avoid doing.Clearing the stock for a new Apple TV in the fall?🤔
Perfect thanks I see that now, also saw it when I added it to the cart.Right at the top of the home page on the App Store app… and on a desktop, click on Apple TV and it's at the top too
I'd still rather they cut $70 off the $229 price.
Put a decent chip inside and enter the console space, We already have controller support so they really could push Apple Arcade a lot further and make it worthwhile.
Apple could put the M1 Ultra in there and still not compete with the consoles. Apple needs games. Games are what sells consoles and Apple just can't get the publishers to deliver top tier games for them. Just like entering the video streaming space, this is going to take a lot of cash to pull off and Apple could easily do it if they wanted, but so far nothing...
You want an Apple TV variant that costs $300+. Few people would buy it, unless Apple can show it off, day one, with a number of compelling AAA titles already running on it. That would require Apple to show developers of AAA games a level of support they've previously shied away from - they've sort of reached out a hand to such developers a few times in the past, but then Apple always wanders off, easily distracted by something else. It's frustrating. And it means such developers are likely gun-shy at this point - Apple would have to work really hard to sell them on it, to assure them that this time they really mean it.More powerful hardware? I'm in! I want an Apple TV Max with 1TB storage.
iMessage, FaceTime Audio, Safari, Maps, there is endless possibility for the Apple TV's A8 and A12 chip.Such as...?
What kind of a scrub controls device usage from the device itself? You think your kids wont be able to figure out how to disable parental controls from the device itself? Have you not heard of device controls from your router? Literally even ISP routers have PER DEVICE allowed time of use, restricted sites, whitelists and blacklists based on age just to name a few. What a waste of time even replying to such a dumb comment, let alone implementing such a dumb feature on the device itself… smh.Apple, just give us PARENTAL CONTROLS aka Screen Time for this thing already pretty please.
Buy an Apple TV, get the gift card with it…. Now buy another Apple TV with that gift card attached…. You’ll get a discounted Apple TV, and return the first purchase with the gift card you got from the second order. Win, and can confirm it works - they didn’t check the gift card # becausee I hadn’t scratched off the bar code, thus I couldn’t have used the gift card.$70 gift card in Canada … drop the price instead!
Oh, cool, perhaps now that you've gotten all that outrage and disdain for people not as kewl as you out of your system, can you please explain how your router can be configured to allow playing certain movies from your iTunes library when only you are sitting in front of the TV, but not when your kids are sitting in front of the TV, while, of course, letting the kid-appropriate movies play for anyone. All those movies are streaming from Apple's servers, with filenames you'll never see, which are subject to change with no notice to you. How, precisely, do you propose to block them?What kind of a scrub controls device usage from the device itself? You think your kids wont be able to figure out how to disable parental controls from the device itself? Have you not heard of device controls from your router? Literally even ISP routers have PER DEVICE allowed time of use, restricted sites, whitelists and blacklists based on age just to name a few. What a waste of time even replying to such a dumb comment, let alone implementing such a dumb feature on the device itself… smh.
If you can only get into parent's mode using a 4-6 digit PIN on the Apple TV, or, better, with biometric authentication on a parent's phone, yes, I'm pretty sure the parents can keep the kids from disabling that. One would, of course, want the Apple TV to report any authentication failures directly to the parent's phones, if parental controls are on.You think your kids wont be able to figure out how to disable parental controls from the device itself?
iMessage, FaceTime Audio, Safari, and Maps all seem like they'd be easier to manipulate with a device, the same kind of device that you'd need to type on and use to manipulate these apps. I have no idea why I'd want FaceTime audio on the AppleTV? I've got FaceTime audio on other devices already.iMessage, FaceTime Audio, Safari, Maps, there is endless possibility for the Apple TV's A8 and A12 chip.
Edit: They could also use continuity camera technology to get full FaceTime calls on a TV. Would be really cool if Apple made the "true apple experience" on the Big Screen.
You want an Apple TV variant that costs $300+. Few people would buy it, unless Apple can show it off, day one, with a number of compelling AAA titles already running on it. That would require Apple to show developers of AAA games a level of support they've previously shied away from - they've sort of reached out a hand to such developers a few times in the past, but then Apple always wanders off, easily distracted by something else. It's frustrating. And it means such developers are likely gun-shy at this point - Apple would have to work really hard to sell them on it, to assure them that this time they really mean it.
With the regular ATV4K being $200, I don't see an ATV Max being much less than $300 (to jump from 64GB to 1TB and add a proper game controller, alongside using a more powerful chip). And $300 would put them head-to-head with the Xbox Series S (which has a metric ton of AAA titles and a positively enormous back catalog available for it), and just $100 shy of the non-disk version of the PS5 (even more powerful and also a ton of AAA titles and back catalog). Apple would have to offer something really compelling, or the market will just see it as an also-ran. And they have that uphill battle with the game developers.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see Apple do something like this, too - I really like the Apple ecosystem - but I don't really see it happening; I don't see Apple being willing to put in the necessary effort. I'd love to be proven wrong.