Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s a mess. I started out by disabling summaries on my important apps: news, health, financial, email, messaging and home automation. Last week I went further and turned everything off. Like a lot of AI, it’s half-baked and should never have left the lab.

Reminds me of the quote by Blaise Pascal: “If I had more time I would have written a shorter letter”.
 
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has urged Apple to disable the Apple Intelligence notification feature, which rolled out globally last week as part of its iOS 18.2 software update. The request comes after the feature created a misleading headline suggesting that murder suspect Luigi Mangione had shot himself, incorrectly attributing the false information to BBC News.
Apple should not comply. It’s under “Beta” itself and users have option to opt out of Apple Intelligence entirely to avoid this. Asking Apple to remove this feature is censorship in my opinion.
This isn't an isolated incident
It’s still in its infancy, and unlike other AIs like Gemini which uses cloud for notification summary (which is a massive privacy disaster waiting to happen), Apple’s notification summary is all done on device via Neural Engine. This is why this is still “Beta” and not a full main feature. Here’s an example of the notification summary I got that’s awray:

The actual notification once expanded:

incoming-121ED535-D023-4AEF-A82D-6888C80C191D.jpeg


Summarized notification via Apple Intelligence :
incoming-1EFBF389-CDD2-4E6D-832F-E2D564B145EF.jpeg


Summarized notification is not accurate but again this is “Beta” so it’s up to users to see if it’s accurate.

The summarization feature is enabled by default, but users can manually disable it through their device settings.
Again, users can opt out by disabling it. Although in my opinion, I think only way users should opt out is disabling Apple Intelligence entirely, not just turning off notification summary. This is “Beta” so users need to expect there are some bugs.
 
Global rollout? Not really, there is still no "Apple Intelligence & Siri" option in settings, I still only have "Siri" on my iPhone 16 Pro (Germany).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devyn89
The “Fake news” tag used to generally be a recurring lie to try to undermine or redirect truth. Now, we have what is spun as cutting-edge technology creating it daily and on purpose. The irony should not be lost on anyone… unless you think this post is fake news too. Perhaps it’s fake news about fake news? 😉

on purpose?

What's your evidence of that?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: russell_314
If you want privacy you get tiny on device models which aren't as good at the job.

But yes as a big AI proponent the implementation of LLMs by Apple so far has been disappointing and disjointed - mainly because I think they're too far behind the curve.

It will get better with time. We need features like being able to point your camera at a card with appointment dates and having it automatically add them to your calender. The tech for this has been there for two years, but not running on a small device with a tiny LLM - and not hooked into Apple's APIs so it can actually do it.

That' is what they're heading towards but I just think they're struggling to keep up with writing the new APIs and creating the guardrails for the LLM to interact with. They need LOTS of them and a very solid LLM to handle them so you could ask Siri anything it sees on the screen and tell it to do something on the phone with it and it'd have the ability to achieve it.

One day...maybe.

They're without a doubt behind the curve.

But they're also trying to thread the needle with privacy and avoiding all politically incorrect content, which makes their efforts all the more complicated and hence even more behind the curve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
They needed something to market the iPhone 16 series since they couldn’t find much of anything else.

I think it was driven more by the fact that their competitors were promoting AI features and Apple didn't want to seem like they were lacking them (even though they were)
 
If you want privacy you get tiny on device models which aren't as good at the job.

But yes as a big AI proponent the implementation of LLMs by Apple so far has been disappointing and disjointed - mainly because I think they're too far behind the curve.

It will get better with time. We need features like being able to point your camera at a card with appointment dates and having it automatically add them to your calender. The tech for this has been there for two years, but not running on a small device with a tiny LLM - and not hooked into Apple's APIs so it can actually do it.

That' is what they're heading towards but I just think they're struggling to keep up with writing the new APIs and creating the guardrails for the LLM to interact with. They need LOTS of them and a very solid LLM to handle them so you could ask Siri anything it sees on the screen and tell it to do something on the phone with it and it'd have the ability to achieve it.

One day...maybe.
It very much depends, I was using Leo AI last night to help solve a networking problem... Its solution was to install a version of iOS from 2013!
 
Again, users can opt out by disabling it. Although in my opinion, I think only way users should opt out is disabling Apple Intelligence entirely, not just turning off notification summary.
Why?
Some of the other Apple Intelligence features are useful.
Notification summaries… Not so much.
And for the record, I’ve left it enabled for weeks, it provided no benefits.
 
Apple should not comply. It’s under “Beta” itself and users have option to opt out of Apple Intelligence entirely to avoid this. Asking Apple to remove this feature is censorship in my opinion.

...

Again, users can opt out by disabling it. Although in my opinion, I think only way users should opt out is disabling Apple Intelligence entirely, not just turning off notification summary. This is “Beta” so users need to expect there are some bugs.
If it is a beta, it should be in the beta channel, not the release channel. This is a problem with many (most?) LLMs, they are error prone and give the wrong results. But, hey, if we call them hallucinations instead of errors, that makes it all fine!
 
The “Fake news” tag used to generally be a recurring lie to try to undermine or redirect truth. Now, we have what is spun as cutting-edge technology creating it daily and on purpose.
Not on purpose. That would imply a specific intent. The last I knew computers didn’t feel emotions.
The irony should not be lost on anyone… unless you think this post is fake news too. Perhaps it’s fake news about fake news? 😉
Fake news is correct.:D
 
I’m glad that CEOs only exist to increase shareholder value and Apple’s CEO is the ultimate Boy Scout who will never thumb his nose at the board with malicious compliance like Jobs when he knows their demands suck.

Apple should have slow rolled this stuff and let the startup hype train to siphon speculative investment with ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE NO SERIOUSLY FOR REAL THIS TIME derail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.