Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,733
39,680


Apple has lost a bid to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit filed against it by Jay Freeman, creator of an alternative App Store known as Cydia for "jailbroken" iPhones and iPads.

cydia-vs-apple-feature.jpg

Freeman sued Apple in late 2020, alleging that Apple has an illegal monopoly over iOS app distribution through the App Store. His complaint also alleged that Apple has "consistently tried to snuff out alternative app stores" such as Cydia.

Apple in January 2022 had its motion to dismiss the lawsuit [url="http://

Article Link: Apple Fails in Bid to Dismiss Cydia Creator's Amended Antitrust Lawsuit
 
Last edited:
Cydia was a must-have back in the days all the way to iphone 4/5 due to all the basic features that were lacking in iphones. Then Apple finally started slowly putting their heads out of their asses and started implementing those features into their iphones. After that, at least for me, there was no need for cydia anymore, but im sure there are still people who use and need it..
 
Cydia is the living proof that Apple users (who want to) can easily handle multiple app stores and/or third party apps. If I am clever enough to know what and what not to download on my Macbook and Windows computer, I am sure can handle it on my iOS device too. Open the gates, Tim.
 
Can somebody, anybody, quote the provision of law that states vendors have to allow outside access to their hardware? does that include all hardware then, car infotainment, kindles, Xbox, Steam, PlayStation's? No? I didn't think so. Because there isn't one. should there be, that is a different discussion
 
Can somebody, anybody, quote the provision of law that states vendors have to allow outside access to their hardware? does that include all hardware then, car infotainment, kindles, Xbox, Steam, PlayStation's? No? I didn't think so. Because there isn't one. should there be, that is a different discussion
First sales doctrine? It's not their hardware
 
Without taking sides… but… from a legal POV: Isn’t it true that the business model of Cydia relies on the fact that people do something that is against the EULA that they previously agreed upon? Namely: jailbreaking their device which is basically exploiting a security-vulnerability to change certain OS-parameters.

I wonder how Freeman is arguing that closing those vulnerabilities is primary done to prevent the use of cydia ?
 
Automobile manufacturers aren't allowed to restrict where we buy gasoline for our cars, and smartphone makers shouldn't be allowed to restrict where we buy apps for our phones.
Wrong analogy. When it comes to “fuel”, Apple doesn’t restrict where you get power from.

And car manufacturers, e.g. Tesla, very well restrict what apps go on their in-car entertainment system. But somehow that’s not a problem, huh?

If enforcing these ridiculous “standards” was ok, it would have to apply to every company equally and you will quickly realize how insane that gets. What if I want my app to run on IoT washing machines? Do I get to sue those manufacturers as well because they don’t support it? ?‍♂️
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.