At first I thought this was really exciting with the new Mac minis and all, but then it really hit me... integrated graphics? Jobs himself put down integrated graphics before, but now suddenly he is moving to it for the Mac mini? I can sort of understand that, being a low budget system and all. I just don't get why we went from an actual GPU to integrated graphics... hopefully this is changed in the near future. At least we got some pretty decent spec upgrades. The choice between Core Solo and Core Duo is a big plus. A max of 2 GB of memory is a God send; as is the four USB 2.0 ports. Front Row included... that's a very good thing. I just don't like how Apple suddenly bumped up the "bare bones" system a couple hundred dollars. The minimum config should still be $499 in my opinion. That was a big selling point. $599 isn't bad for what you get, but the previous price tag just looks so much better. And I don't quite agree with the $799 price tag of the Core Duo model. I understand it costs more money to build, but I think it would've been just fine at even $699.
So I don't know if I want the iMac fort the Mac mini now... I'm leaning more towards the iMac. It seems like a much better value, especially considering the higher specs and included display.
Why, Apple?! Why did you have to include integrated graphics? This is going to be frowned upon by so many tech sites, it's going to make the Mac mini look bad. The overall specs are very nice, I'll give it that... but why the graphics?!
Sorry, I tend to repeat myself pretty often.