No. No they don’t.Apple has more lawyers than designers
No. No they don’t.Apple has more lawyers than designers
Actually my understanding of their offering is hardware virtualization. They are booting actual iOS by replicating the hardware and boot chain in software. So it should not be surprising they are going to lose this court case.
And when Corellium decides to sell only the virtualized iPhone hardware and requiring the user to download iOS from apple to complete the install, apple can sue the users
If they’d like.And when Corellium decides to sell only the virtualized iPhone hardware and requiring the user to download iOS from apple to complete the install, apple can sue the users
If they’d like.
Of course, inducing copyright infringement is also something corellium might be liable for in that case, depending on how they market it, whether they assist or instruct the users in doing the installation of the iOS image, etc.
Honestly. They should lay the groundwork and the user provides the firmware. Just like an emulator
Corellium is not only distributing virtualized copies of iOS, but actively selling them and profiting monetarily from doing so. I have to side with Apple regarding this one. Not going to end well for Corellium.
This didn't age well. 😂Apple has a good case against them, I suspect Corellium won't have much of a chance defending themselves. You can't recreate someone's intellectual property without asking, especially code that is owned by Apple.