macfacts macrumors 603 Oct 7, 2012 5,949 7,346 Cybertron Aug 5, 2024 #176 surferfb said: Apple should just let others infringe on their intellectual property? “Rolex doesn’t have to make $500 watches, but they shouldn’t be stopping counterfeiters from selling $500 knock-offs”. Click to expand... It is legal to reverse engineer, iMessage isn't patented.
surferfb said: Apple should just let others infringe on their intellectual property? “Rolex doesn’t have to make $500 watches, but they shouldn’t be stopping counterfeiters from selling $500 knock-offs”. Click to expand... It is legal to reverse engineer, iMessage isn't patented.
jlc1978 macrumors 604 Aug 14, 2009 6,535 5,957 Aug 6, 2024 #177 macfacts said: It is legal to reverse engineer, iMessage isn't patented. Click to expand... True, but that dosn't mean a company has to provide access to its infrastructure.
macfacts said: It is legal to reverse engineer, iMessage isn't patented. Click to expand... True, but that dosn't mean a company has to provide access to its infrastructure.