Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Fined $11 Million in Italy for Employing 'Aggressive Methods' in Commercial Use of Private Data
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I have. But of course the UK government wants to 'simplify' the permissions you give, so my guess is that they will diverge from the EU to allow surveillance capitalism to run rampant. Anyway, Apple looks lees and less like it is concerned about privacy.
In Europe, it has to be opt in, not opt out – Italy accuses Apple to have checked some checkboxes by default, which is not conform to law.
Because that’s what politicians do. They produce nothing of value themselves and rely on money they take from people who do.
I get your sarcastic comment, but how trying to actually read the article? That might have helped.
I think it is just another money grab by a country with a weak economy. Sure, we can sue/fine Apple because they have more than we do mentality.
As far as I understand from the documents by the authority, they state that when a user creates a new Apple ID it comes with some options enabled by default which allow Apple to send promotional emails and collect data for commercial use.
The authority takes issue that the user is not adequately informed of these default options, they cannot be disabled completely during the Apple ID creation process and these options should not be opt-out in the first place.
I think this is just bad reporting on the part of MR. They tell you what they read in a machine translation of the press release. But the evidence against Apple and Google are enumerated in linked PDF's, which MR doesn't mention at all.
In MR's defense, getting an automated translation of a webpage takes a two clicks of the mouse. Translating, reading, and then summarizing a few paragraphs is trivial. Getting a translation of a PDF takes effort. To get a rough translation, I had to download the PDF, go to Googles document translation page, and have it translated. It is not a clean translation, mind you, but you can get the gist. It is 58 pages, and I've not read it all, but it seems to talk a lot about Apple using data to target ads for Apple and 3rd party apps and services.
I've no opinion on whether any of this violated Italian law, but I suspect that the Italian regulatory agencies know more about it than anyone here.
Ah, Italy! The country where scientists get jailed for failing to predict earthquakes…
Sure .. Italy (8 or 9 th economy in the world afaik) wil fix many things with 11M€…
They once sent me an email inviting me to buy something “for Mother’s Day”.
That was a few days after my mother had just died. I was not best pleased.
I think if they made it opt-in instead of opt-out (I.e. the box is by default not ticked) they’d have been in the clear.
I did not like that either, and that purple color phones was creepy!
No, the GDPR is an EU regulation: each invidivual State member was required to enact their own national legislation in compliance with the regulation, UK included.
Yet one of the worst GDPs per capita of any developed country. I believe they are below ALL 50 states at this point. They didn't make the cut for the Euro zone but were allowed in anyway.
This fine is a joke. Both Apple and Google are up front about data usage. Google is literally free because you implicitly opt in to targeted ads. Italy is way out of line here.
For a certain value of “targeted”. Yesterday, Google was serving me ads for preowned bulldozers. They aren’t exactly Robin Hood.
