FAS in a ruling that ordered Apple to address the regulatory violations by removing rules that allow it to reject third-party apps
Does that mean if an Anti-Putin app is submitted Apple will have to approve it and they will be fine with that?
FAS in a ruling that ordered Apple to address the regulatory violations by removing rules that allow it to reject third-party apps
Apples and oranges, dude."Apple occupies a dominant position with a 100% share of the market for mobile apps based on the iOS operating system"
Cool, let me try this.
"Sony occupies a dominant position with a 100% share of the market for console apps based on the Playstation operating system"
"Nintendo occupies a dominant position with a 100% share of the market for console apps based on the Nintendo operating system"
"Microsoft occupies a dominant position with a 100% share of the market for console apps based on the Xbox operating system"
"Youtube occupies a dominant position with 100% share of the market for videos based on the Youtube platform"
"Google occupies a dominant position with 100% share of internet search based on the Google platform"
"Alexa occupies a dominant position with 100% share of smart home skills based on the Alexa platform"
"Twitch occupies a dominant position with 100% share of live streams based on the Twitch platform"
Anyone know why I can’t get McDonald's fries at Arby's? Total BS.Lol. As usual you completely miss the point. Every one of those systems you can get games/apps for in multiple places
With the iPhone/iPad you have only ONE place to get games & apps.
I think argument is more that Burger King won't let you bring a Big Mac into their restaurant and eat it there.And Burger King has a Monopoly, with 100% control over their Whopper.
More like McDonald's can't walk into Burger King and use their equipment/ingredients/staff to make and sell a Big Mac to Burger King's customers and walk out with all the profit. A customer who has already bought a Big Mac can bring it in and eat it just fine (just like someone who paid for a subscription on the web to Netflix or Spotify can use it just fine in the app)I think argument is more that Burger King won't let you bring a Big Mac into their restaurant and eat it there.
Don’t get too philosophical. This is because 1) Apple is the richest company on the planet and everyone will try and milk them for profit 2) Russia wants Apple to have preinstalled Russian apps on iPhones . Apple, obviously, pay some small fine, than lose prestige and profits in the future, much greater than 12 millionBoom! Another domino falls. Yet another international regulator affirms that the ascendent definition of "market" for competition regulation and antitrust purposes is defined by platform, eg iOS, (and Android), and not "Smartphones" as a whole.
iOS is A market, Android is A market, and competition regulation is to operate within each of them in isolation, when considering how platform owners wield power within those markets.
This will continue the trend whose eventuality will potentially render as moot Apple's primary argument - that by selling fewer phones than all Android makers put together, they are by definition incapable of being considered to have monopoly power.
Lol. As usual you completely miss the point. Every one of those systems you can get games/apps for in multiple places
With the iPhone/iPad you have only ONE place to get games & apps.
Technically, that's wholly not true. You can only get and install games (software) via their (Sony/Nintendo/MS/Atari/etc) approved venues. They sell via their approved physical method, and their approved digital. Just because you can buy a disk at your local pawn shop, it's not allowing you the freedom to download the software from a site and burn your own disk.Lol. As usual you completely miss the point. Every one of those systems you can get games/apps for in multiple places
With the iPhone/iPad you have only ONE place to get games & apps.
Apples and oranges, dude.
You forgot that part “…said the FAS in a ruling that ordered Apple to address the regulatory violations by removing rules that allow it to reject third-party apps.”$12M is pocket change for oligarchs who have billions. Same for the government that continuously robs its people blind. I won't even mention Apple because they probably spend more on toilet paper per month. I think this is more of a symbolic fine than anything else.
Apple has said that it "respectfully" disagrees with the FAS's decision and plans to appeal it.
Boom! Another domino falls.
You are aware that all of the games from those devices are controlled by the device owners. No one can release software for any of them without approval. Therefore they are exactly the same as Apple although you can buy the software in more locations, unless you have an all digital device in which case it’s the same as Apple.Lol. As usual you completely miss the point. Every one of those systems you can get games/apps for in multiple places
With the iPhone/iPad you have only ONE place to get games & apps.
I am amazed how many slaves here are fighting and rooting for a transnational, environment destroying, highly egoistic corporation like Apple.Hahaha, and this is just the start.
More countries and EU will join, more companies and customers will sue.
They better hire more lawyers…
Well, MR forum is primary an Apple FanBoy breeding ground, I don't wonder much...I am amazed how many slaves here are fighting and rooting for a transnational, environment destroying, highly egoistic corporation like Apple.
When Apple amasses its armies on the Ukrainian border after seizing the Crimea and creating a fake "republic" nobody recognizes except Apple, I'll be the first to condemn them.I am amazed how many slaves here are fighting and rooting for a transnational, environment destroying, highly egoistic corporation like Apple.
and it makes sense, because they have built a seating area with a/c for their customers.I think argument is more that Burger King won't let you bring a Big Mac into their restaurant and eat it there.