Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple fires head of iPhone division
- Thread starter skidbubble
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Substitute Apple with Nokia and watch the tumble weeds roll by.
For you maybe
Maybe he was an IBM moll and his IBM overlords bid him to sabotage the iP4?!
Steve Jobs got wind of this and fire him?
Steve Jobs got wind of this and fire him?
Nice employers will give you the option to quit or resign and if you don't then they fire you. Being fired sounds worse than quitting or resigning from a job. Most professionals will resign or quit rather than being fired.
Is this true? Forced to quit or quit on his own? Was this reported?
All I saw was that he was refusing to answer his cellphone when he was contacted by the NY Times for a comment (maybe he did answer but the proximity sensor acted up on his iPhone).
Maybe the explanation "your holding it wrong" just didnt sit well with Steve and he may have hated to have to say that to his customers
That is quite an embarrassing statement.
That is quite an embarrassing statement.
John Gruber has heard otherwise:
"From what Ive heard, its clear he was sacked. Papermaster was a conspicuous absence at the Antennagate press conference. Inside Apple, hes the guy responsible for the antenna thats a quote from a source back on July 23. (Another quote from the same source: Apparently the antenna guys used to have a big chip on their shoulder. No more.)"
Maybe the explanation "your holding it wrong" just didnt sit well with Steve and he may have hated to have to say that to his customers
That is quite an embarrassing statement.
I don't think Steve Jobs has any qualms about being a jerk.
I agree. I also think he has a very low opinion of Apple customers. It's true that he has amazing vision in terms of what people want and will buy. It's true that, in most cases, his company builds quality products that also look cool. That has worked, in some cases, to the consumer's disadvantage. We've proven that we'd buy Jobs' fly swatter if he put "i" in front of it and told us it was good. That kind of reinforcement of an arrogant, narcissistic, paranoid jerk-off personality can't contribute much to his respect for us. "We love and care about our customers.", my ass.
My take on the whole Antennagate thing, for whatever it's worth, is that Jobs was likely ultimately responsible for releasing to the public a defective device that would, in certain circumstances, perform unsatisfactorily. Apple should have packaged a bumper with every iPhone from the beginning, along with an advisory that it might or might not be necessary to use it in certain signal environments, and that customers who found that unacceptable were welcome to return the package for a full refund, no questions asked. But the aforementioned ego-maniacal personality and our own fanboyism caused Jobs to badly underestimate us and misplay the entire situation. Yet, when all is said and done, what affect did any of that have on anything whatsoever? Not a damned bit. They're selling iPhones faster than they can kick 'em out the door, and the phone, in my experience, is a fine piece of equipment, as long as it's used with some sort of antenna shielding in those questionable signal environments. Hell, many people live in such strong environments that they're still convinced there's no problem whatsoever with the iPhone 4 and honestly think those of us who understand the reality are bent. Hopefully, the good that will come of the iPhone 4's troubles will be that Jobs won't be so quick to underestimate his customers in the future. But I wouldn't bet on it.
To come back fully to topic, I don't think it matters when Papermaster departed, at least within a couple years of Antennagate. There was bound to be this kind of speculation, and c'mon, face it. In corporate and political environments, when a scandal rocks the joint, a scapegoat is found and terminated, justified or not. We DON'T know that's the case here; all we know is the timing is suspicious.
There is a lot that we don't know.
I am sure Apple launched a secret internal investigation to assess the antenna/prox sensor issue and see if this was preventable, or who knew what and when.
I know it is pure speculation, but isn't it possible that Steve discovered that Papermaster did know about the issue, but for whatever reason covered it up and told Steve Jobs that everything was OK and on track. Steve, as the face of Apple, has to publicly defend the device- and I can imagine he'd be insanely pissed if he learned that the whole thing was preventable.
He most likely got a fat severance package and is now on a beach in hawaii or something getting fat pay to do nothing for a year.
I wouldn't feel too bad for any of these guys.....he'll go work for another massive IT/Computer/development company and continue to make a huge amount of coin for doing relatively little work.
I wouldn't feel too bad for any of these guys.....he'll go work for another massive IT/Computer/development company and continue to make a huge amount of coin for doing relatively little work.