Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A dead SSD should mean a simple replacement of the SSD, not the entire board. Soldering the SSD to the board makes this recovery tool and the "port to nowhere" necessary. Also it eliminates the possibility of upgrading your SSD down the road.

Yes, there are tradeoffs, but when the entire world is demanding thinner Macbook Pros, they have to draw a line in the sand somewhere. We all have to suffer with non-upgradable stuff, but that apparently is the price to pay. I mean, we're not barbarians. We wouldn't want to sit around with a macbook pro that was thicker than 131 millimeters. It's downright embarrassing.

"Hey Johnson! I notice your laptop is 131mm thick! That is important to me, an executive! You work here?! Double plus good!"
"Yessir! Don't worry, though, it gets less than 5 hours of battery, and I assume the SSD will never fail, because Time Machine only works half the time!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
The soldered down SSD is strictly about Apple's profit margin and offers NO benefit to the consumer.
 
Any word on how much this will cost if you are out of warranty?
Or if you are moving to some other system? Like Windows or a Mac Pro which doesn't have USB-C?
I'll never know, because I back up my data. Discussion/speculation on this whole topic is kind of pointless, because anyone who has the forethought to think about it in advance, probably won't ever need it.
 
... it eliminates the possibility of upgrading your SSD down the road.

Yes, that's the point. If you can't upgrade your Mac, you give a LOT more money to Apple - either by paying their initial prices for more flash and DRAM, or by buying a brand new computer more often to deal with running out of memory. You can give $500 to Samsung for an upgradeable 2 TB flash drive, or you can give $2,000 to Apple to buy a computer with one soldered on. That's like selling 3 iPhones.

We still have our Unibody Macs in addition to our retinas, because we cheaply upgraded the Unibodies to the point where they're still superior to the Retinas in every way but weight.
 
Give me thick, heavy, and upgradeable over thin, light, and disposable any day.
Any day until the day you stack up 100k airmiles per year, weight and bulk doesn't matter. For the sake of my back and carbon footprint, I prefer thin and light.
 
Any day until the day you stack up 100k airmiles per year, weight and bulk doesn't matter. For the sake of my back and carbon footprint, I prefer thin and light.
If thin and light is what is important, why not choose a MBA then?
 
If thin and light is what is important, why not choose a MBA then?
While indeed being heavier, the bulk of the new MBPr is not that much different with the MBA. I hadn't too much luck with the battery of my rMB otherwise I'd still use that jewel as my daily machine.
 
Any day until the day you stack up 100k airmiles per year, weight and bulk doesn't matter. For the sake of my back and carbon footprint, I prefer thin and light.

Wow and damn! 100k air miles per year? I hear you on the burden of traveling light. But regarding macs, reducing your "Carbon footprint" is merely Greenwashing on their part if one takes into consideration all of this planned obsolescence. All I'm asking for is to be able to upgrade the CPU, GPU, RAM, SSD, and of course, swap out the battery as we could pre-unibody. And that goes for the phone, too.

I just want a portable machine that can run Pro Tools 12 without throttling or other problems. But I may be asking too much from Apple. (What is a computer?)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.