how hard was it to get your class 3 from the FAA? I too an type, since the age of 2, so 43 years here myself, with a pump and CGM.
I'm not sure if I replied back to you, but what I did was:
1. See these two sites:
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/aam/ame/guide/media/guide.pdf (Search for Insulin, and it's around page 200-300... it gets updated quite regularly)
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/aam/ame/guide/pharm/insulin/
Also search in there for any other things you may have. I had to do the protocol for Sleep Apnea too.
2. Gather all of the info needed. The treadmill test was a lot of fun... "You only need one more beat per minute" (and I'm thinking, "how do I get my heart to beat faster?")
3. Fill out the form 8500-8:
(
https://medxpress.faa.gov/medxpress/) and Print it out. Make sure you have the numbers that you need to give to the AME.
4. PRINT OUT THE 8500-8, and tell the AME that you want a CONSULTATION APPOINTMENT. Bring all of your paperwork from steps 1-3 in. ONCE THE AME GOES INTO MedXPress, the clock starts, and you have to have all of the info into the FAA (they have to have it) within 90 days.
5. If all of the info looks good, have the AME start the exam (this can be the same day/visit, or a follow-up), and wait.... and wait... You will get a deferral letter that says that the application is going to Oklahoma City. If you are curious, give them a call, and have your numbers (on the letter that comes back from the FAA) to give them. Just remember they are looking in a computer database, and aren't the ones doing the looking at the 1/2" stack of paper you gave them. All they can give you is status, so it helps to be friendly with them.
6. If you still fail, they will tell you why, and give you a chance to provide more information.
Believe it or not, the FAA wants to help. Everyone I have spoken with at the FAA, be it where I work (clues are available on where I live), or with getting the Class 3. For 2015, they rejected 200 out of some 150,000 requests they had outright. People that have given up aren't in that 200. I know I'm wrong on the actual numbers, but the percentage was incredibly small.
[doublepost=1492378048][/doublepost]
This is not true! There are existing non-invasive devices in Europe. MIT and UCSD are also independently developed monitoring devices.
Really? What brand, so I can pick one up when I go over there next?