This is at the bottom of the list of things to be worried about for this device.
Where do you base this? EU regulations are the sole reason for many recent changes in tech.EU now will have to make a new law...
I hope EU will understand that you cannot keep up with giant tech companies...that ship is sailed
Nothing to see here folks! Please disperse!So...? What's the big deal here?
Well, it’s not charging. It’s about how one part of the system connects to another, as I see it. But we’ll see when it comes out.EU now will have to make a new law...
I hope EU will understand that you cannot keep up with giant tech companies...that ship is sailed
That’s how most of Gurman‘s articles imply rumors, use carefully phrased wording to increase article clickbait. Of course he is one of many that all do that.That's a super vague article articulating clickbait headline. The same thing can be said about MacBooks, they do have a propriety connector (MagSafe).
If the headline would say "Apple's new Reality Headset will use magsafe for charging" it would not result with controversial anger posts and reshares that it is currently producing now is it?
Imagine paying $3000 and having to wear a battery pack around your waist. 😅 I really hope Gurman's just messing around, because if this stuff is actually true, this is going to be the most goofy-looking headset.
According to Gurman, the round tip must be rotated clockwise to lock it in so that it doesn't fall out during use,
while "the cable itself connects to the battery pack, and those two pieces aren't separable.
Instead of just plugging in a battery pack you already own using a usb-c cable, you will need to use an Apple made power pack that will likely cost £200+ each time it needs replacing.So...? What's the big deal here?
We’ve had licensed lightning batteries for years.Instead of just plugging in a battery pack you already own using a usb-c cable, you will need to use an Apple made power pack that will likely cost £200+ each time it needs replacing.
Or, because of the external battery, this is the first AR headset that doesn’t look/feel goofy and actually turns out useful.Imagine paying $3000 and having to wear a battery pack around your waist. 😅 I really hope Gurman's just messing around, because if this stuff is actually true, this is going to be the most goofy-looking headset.
...except the whole "AR/MR as a work tool" idea is going to live and die on how practical the goggles are to use for long periods. I don't doubt that Apple can come up with impressive demos of what the tech can do - there already have been impressive demos by others (and we've all seen AR on sci-fi shows) - but if you have to mess up your hair with strappy goggles, change battery packs every 2 hours (or tether your head to the desk) its not going to fly.This is at the bottom of the list of things to be worried about for this device.
Try adding another '9' to that figure.Of course. They want you to buy the Apple $99 battery. Not the USB-C one on Amazon for $30.
you are missing my point...tech giants will always find a way ..you cannot stop "innovations" while laws are always a decade behind itWhere do you base this? EU regulations are the sole reason for many recent changes in tech.
You can't really compare the benefit of a universal charger for *all* phones with the negligent amount of VR sets sold for many years to come...
It's about time for US to break silly taboos and regulate towards the same direction