Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have to believe that it was mission hardened. No way would they put a stock battery or power supply in a small capsule like that. A fire could be catastrophic. I am wondering what they did about the batteries. Was that made public anywhere?
While I see your point I very very much doubt they hardened the hardware including the battery at all. I suspect they loaded it with a set of apps and settings and that's it. It would be hard enough to harden the phone in any way that they would just say no iPhones instead if they thought there was a danger. Batteries do catch fire but phone batteries way less so. I think the risk is more with larger batteries.
 
I have to believe that it was mission hardened. No way would they put a stock battery or power supply in a small capsule like that. A fire could be catastrophic. I am wondering what they did about the batteries. Was that made public anywhere?
The only hardware modification to the iPhone 17 Pro Maxes used by the astronauts on the Artemis II mission was that all the circuitry that emits radio frequencies (wifi, Bluetooth, cellular) was permanently disabled using custom firmware written specifically for these flight units. These iPhones had no menu option to toggle any of the RF circuitry back on, to be absolutely certain that there would be no accidental EMI/RF emissions that could interfere with Orion’s navigation systems, which rely on high-speed wireless data transfer for their internal sensors. The iPhone RF chips weren’t removed since the A-series chipsets are so integrated that removing these can brick the entire logic board or create thermal hot spots where the power management system gets confused. It was safer and more stable for NASA to keep the hardware intact but lobotomize the RF circuitry at the root level.

These iPhones were also put through a deep-cleaning process in which they were disassembled and reassembled in a clean room to make sure there were no stray particles or outgassing materials (like certain adhesives) that could contaminate the spacecraft's life-support filters.

Aside from that, the units were stock, with Ceramic Shield 2 display glass (no screen protectors), the standard lithium battery, etc. The USB-C ports remained functional since this is how the photos were transferred to the capsule’s local server, through a physical cable, before being beamed to Earth via the Deep Space Network. The A19 chip’s efficiency and the iPhone 17's thermal management were found to meet the 8-psi (pounds per square inch) pressure environment of the Orion capsule without modification.

One of the points for bringing iPhones on the mission was to see how well some stock commercial off-the-shelf electronics products do in space. The possibility of occasional bit-flips from going through the Van Allen radiation belt was OK since these weren't mission-critical devices.
 
Aside from that, the units were stock, with Ceramic Shield 2 display glass (no screen protectors), the standard lithium battery, etc.

Nice summary. Thank you. Given all the warnings we have all heard about unpredictable defects in lithium batteries and the resulting fires, I am still very surprised that they allowed this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
The only hardware modification to the iPhone 17 Pro Maxes used by the astronauts on the Artemis II mission was that all the circuitry that emits radio frequencies (wifi, Bluetooth, cellular) was permanently disabled using custom firmware written specifically for these flight units. These iPhones had no menu option to toggle any of the RF circuitry back on, to be absolutely certain that there would be no accidental EMI/RF emissions that could interfere with Orion’s navigation systems, which rely on high-speed wireless data transfer for their internal sensors. The iPhone RF chips weren’t removed since the A-series chipsets are so integrated that removing these can brick the entire logic board or create thermal hot spots where the power management system gets confused. It was safer and more stable for NASA to keep the hardware intact but lobotomize the RF circuitry at the root level.

These iPhones were also put through a deep-cleaning process in which they were disassembled and reassembled in a clean room to make sure there were no stray particles or outgassing materials (like certain adhesives) that could contaminate the spacecraft's life-support filters.

Aside from that, the units were stock, with Ceramic Shield 2 display glass (no screen protectors), the standard lithium battery, etc. The USB-C ports remained functional since this is how the photos were transferred to the capsule’s local server, through a physical cable, before being beamed to Earth via the Deep Space Network. The A19 chip’s efficiency and the iPhone 17's thermal management were found to meet the 8-psi (pounds per square inch) pressure environment of the Orion capsule without modification.

One of the points for bringing iPhones on the mission was to see how well some stock commercial off-the-shelf electronics products do in space. The possibility of occasional bit-flips from going through the Van Allen radiation belt was OK since these weren't mission-critical devices.
Very cool, thanks for the info. wonder if they were tested for depressurisation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
Nice summary. Thank you. Given all the warnings we have all heard about unpredictable defects in lithium batteries and the resulting fires, I am still very surprised that they allowed this.

That's why they brought iPhones and not Galaxy Note 7s.

I'm assuming that as part of the thorough disassembly and cleaning process they also made sure the batteries were in the best shape they could possibly be.

They also likely had fire suppression bags like those used when repairing phones, and lots of other anti-fire measures as standard.
 
The only hardware modification to the iPhone 17 Pro Maxes used by the astronauts on the Artemis II mission was that all the circuitry that emits radio frequencies (wifi, Bluetooth, cellular) was permanently disabled using custom firmware written specifically for these flight units. These iPhones had no menu option to toggle any of the RF circuitry back on, to be absolutely certain that there would be no accidental EMI/RF emissions that could interfere with Orion’s navigation systems, which rely on high-speed wireless data transfer for their internal sensors. The iPhone RF chips weren’t removed since the A-series chipsets are so integrated that removing these can brick the entire logic board or create thermal hot spots where the power management system gets confused. It was safer and more stable for NASA to keep the hardware intact but lobotomize the RF circuitry at the root level.

These iPhones were also put through a deep-cleaning process in which they were disassembled and reassembled in a clean room to make sure there were no stray particles or outgassing materials (like certain adhesives) that could contaminate the spacecraft's life-support filters.

Aside from that, the units were stock, with Ceramic Shield 2 display glass (no screen protectors), the standard lithium battery, etc. The USB-C ports remained functional since this is how the photos were transferred to the capsule’s local server, through a physical cable, before being beamed to Earth via the Deep Space Network. The A19 chip’s efficiency and the iPhone 17's thermal management were found to meet the 8-psi (pounds per square inch) pressure environment of the Orion capsule without modification.

One of the points for bringing iPhones on the mission was to see how well some stock commercial off-the-shelf electronics products do in space. The possibility of occasional bit-flips from going through the Van Allen radiation belt was OK since these weren't mission-critical devices.
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
If anything the Nikon shots puts them to shame.
Cannot be directly compared because iPhone and Nikon photos in this article are not identical in content. The latter were shot directly through the window, whereas the iPhone lenses had to “negotiate” between a foreground and a background.

Besides, I would expect a DSLR camera to do better than a smartphone camera just like an iPhone 17 PM is better at sending text messages and web-surfing than a Nikon D5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hans1972
You mean to tell me the U.S. spent $4 billion on the Artemis II lunar observation mission and yet couldn't find another $20,000+ for a Hasselblad Medium Format digital camera system to properly photograph the Earth and the Moon from space? 🤦‍♂️
🤣 There are a number of reasons why we took a D5 and not a Hasselblad.
 
The only hardware modification to the iPhone 17 Pro Maxes used by the astronauts on the Artemis II mission was that all the circuitry that emits radio frequencies (wifi, Bluetooth, cellular) was permanently disabled using custom firmware written specifically for these flight units. These iPhones had no menu option to toggle any of the RF circuitry back on, …
Thanks much for these details!
So, no chance Settings > Spaceship Mode will be added to Airplane Mode in iOS 28.6. in time for Artemis 3? 😊
 
Samsung captures the moon from Earth with its zoom capabilities, iPhone needs to travel gazillion miles and than take the photo to achieve the same results.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: SidricTheViking
should've sent a prototype of the iPhone fold to blow minds
I like your suggestion. First sighting of the foldable inside the Orion spacecraft. Plenty of possibilities for turning it into an ad afterwards, e.g. …

(The outer screen playing the video of Artemis’ liftoff, transitioning to the inner screen as it unfolds to show a view of moon and earth, then folding back to the outer screen showing the capsule splashdown).
“The iPhone Orion has landed”

Would have solved the naming dilemma too.
😊🚀😊
 
Last edited:
The only hardware modification to the iPhone 17 Pro Maxes used by the astronauts on the Artemis II mission was that all the circuitry that emits radio frequencies (wifi, Bluetooth, cellular) was permanently disabled using custom firmware written specifically for these flight units. These iPhones had no menu option to toggle any of the RF circuitry back on, to be absolutely certain that there would be no accidental EMI/RF emissions that could interfere with Orion’s navigation systems, which rely on high-speed wireless data transfer for their internal sensors. The iPhone RF chips weren’t removed since the A-series chipsets are so integrated that removing these can brick the entire logic board or create thermal hot spots where the power management system gets confused. It was safer and more stable for NASA to keep the hardware intact but lobotomize the RF circuitry at the root level.

These iPhones were also put through a deep-cleaning process in which they were disassembled and reassembled in a clean room to make sure there were no stray particles or outgassing materials (like certain adhesives) that could contaminate the spacecraft's life-support filters.

Aside from that, the units were stock, with Ceramic Shield 2 display glass (no screen protectors), the standard lithium battery, etc. The USB-C ports remained functional since this is how the photos were transferred to the capsule’s local server, through a physical cable, before being beamed to Earth via the Deep Space Network. The A19 chip’s efficiency and the iPhone 17's thermal management were found to meet the 8-psi (pounds per square inch) pressure environment of the Orion capsule without modification.

One of the points for bringing iPhones on the mission was to see how well some stock commercial off-the-shelf electronics products do in space. The possibility of occasional bit-flips from going through the Van Allen radiation belt was OK since these weren't mission-critical devices.
Very interesting, thank you. Do you have a linkable source for this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
Samsung captures the moon from Earth with its zoom capabilities, iPhone needs to travel gazillion miles and than take the photo to achieve the same results.

Yes, but iPhone takes a real photo of the moon whereas Samsung fakes it.
 
I like your suggestion. First sighting of the foldable inside the Orion spacecraft. Plenty of possibilities for turning it into an ad afterwards, e.g. …

(The outer screen playing the video of Artemis’ liftoff, transitioning to the inner screen as it unfolds to show a view of moon and earth, then folding back to the outer screen showing the capsule splashdown).
“The iPhone Orion has landed”

Would have solved the naming dilemma too.
😊🚀😊
Almost. Surely iPhone iNtegrity would be the better name? 😄
 
The US has seen enough space mission disasters to know not to count their chickens before they hatch. There's plenty of time to market the crap out of this now that the mission is successfully completed.
My thoughts exactly. I noticed how Apple kept quiet up until the mission was successfully completed.
I remember some days ago Marques pointing out that Apple may be missing on a big PR campaign here.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.