Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,504
37,792


Apple is facing a lawsuit seeking $1.2 billion in damages over its decision to abandon plans for scanning iCloud photos for child sexual abuse material (CSAM), according to a report from The New York Times.

iCloud-General-Feature.jpg

Filed in Northern California on Saturday, the lawsuit represents a potential group of 2,680 victims and alleges that Apple's failure to implement previously announced child safety tools has allowed harmful content to continue circulating, causing ongoing harm to victims.

In 2021, Apple announced plans to implement CSAM detection in iCloud Photos, alongside other child safety features. However, the company faced significant backlash from privacy advocates, security researchers, and policy groups who argued the technology could create potential backdoors for government surveillance. Apple subsequently postponed and later abandoned the initiative.

Explaining its decision at the time, Apple said that implementing universal scanning of users' private iCloud storage would introduce major security vulnerabilities that malicious actors could potentially exploit. Apple also expressed concerns that such a system could establish a problematic precedent, in that once content scanning infrastructure exists for one purpose, it could face pressure to expand into broader surveillance applications across different types of content and messaging platforms, including those that use encryption.

The lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, filing under a pseudonym, said she continues to receive law enforcement notices about individuals being charged with possessing abuse images of her from when she was an infant. The lawsuit argues that Apple's decision not to proceed with its announced safety measures has forced victims to repeatedly relive their trauma.

In response to the lawsuit, Apple spokesperson Fred Sainz underlined the company's commitment to fighting child exploitation, stating that Apple is "urgently and actively innovating to combat these crimes without compromising the security and privacy of all our users." Apple pointed to existing features like Communication Safety, which warns children about potentially inappropriate content, as examples of its ongoing child protection efforts.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple Hit With $1.2B Lawsuit Over Abandoned CSAM Detection System
 
Maybe we should sue display manufactures for having the ability to display illicit content. We could also sue town, counties, states, and national governments for allowing people who engage in illegal activities to live within their boarders. I mean surely the government should be “scanning” your home to make sure you aren’t engaged in any activity that harms others right?

If we are OK holding innocent people accountable for the actions of the perpetrators, it kind of seems like we could sue anyone and everyone…
 
Maybe we should sue display manufactures for having the ability to display illicit content. We could also sue town, counties, states, and national governments for allowing people who engage in illegal activities to live within their boarders. I mean surely the government should be “scanning” your home to make sure you aren’t engaged in any activity that harms others right?

If we are OK holding innocent people accountable for the actions of the perpetrators, it kind of seems like we could sue anyone and everyone…
My thoughts exactly
 
Apple is damned if they do; damned if they don’t.

While I can sympathize if the individual’s claim is true, how can they blame Apple?

The image(s) are likely circulated on far more Android and Windows devices than Apple’s.

And who is to say if Apple implemented its program that it would detect the victim’s images. All circumstantial- a judge should quickly quash this.
 
Last edited:
NOT A GOOD IDEA WITH THE CURRENT INCOMING ADMINISTRATION.
Northern California is of the same *Party* that is returning to power next month in America 😳 they always vote that direction and that’s not a good idea at all. Apple will endanger everyone who is LGBTQ+ and P0C including migrants.
 
Is Apple really interested in protecting the privacy of their customers, or would that scanning technology have uncovered much more than the pedophiles in positions of power were willing to permit?

Yes, the scanning technology would absolutely compromise privacy of and be leveraged against innocent people. But that's not why the courts will dismiss the lawsuit(s). Is there anyone left in the US Government not compromised by the Diddy-Epstein-Cartel-Ukraine cabal?
 
Oh I'm really going to be popular with this one.

2680 people's situation does not represent the greater good which is hundreds of millions of people's communication security being put at risk by non-deterministic reporting and content moderation.

But of course 2860 people will be happy to live with their problem, which won't be solved either way, if they get some cash for it. They just want money. And so do lawyers.

If people really want to fix this problem it'll be case of dealing with individuals via good old fashioned social methods i.e. effective policing and rehabilitation. But that's hard, so they'll take some money instead.
 
Any living being defending this whole CSAM scan implementation thing are the very same people who would turn in people who the Party of the 0range Charlatan labels undesirables. It is not a joke. It’s a matter of the truth
It’s similar to how Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars had both sides fighting each other when they never saw who the true enemy was until it was too late.
Luke Skywalker VS Darth Vader = Divide & Conquer so the Rich/Ruling Class people can eat a buffet in luxury while the others are fighting each other.
 
It wasn't the scanning of iCloud storage that was the issue (personally, I think they should be doing this), it was the on-device scanning that was the problem.
Exactly. Many here argued it was OK because it was only comparing a hash, completely ignoring the fact that the hash was generated on YOUR device. Almost like generating a hash from a file on your device was supposed to just happen by “Apple magic”.
 
Exactly. Many here argued it was OK because it was only comparing a hash, completely ignoring the fact that the hash was generated on YOUR device. Almost like generating a hash from a file on your device was supposed to just happen by “Apple magic”.

I don't see a difference here. Don't all photos generated / stored on the iPhone get uploaded to the iCloud? Are users really not creating AppleIDs to avoid this?
 
Apple is damned if they do; damned if they don’t.

While I can sympathize if the individual’s claim is true, how can they blame Apple?

The image(s) are likely circulated on far more Android devices than Apple’s.

And who is to say if Apple implemented its program that it would detect the victim’s images. All circumstantial- a judge should quickly quash this.
They should sue the internet for allowing the circulation of such material.
This is another opportunistic lawyer attempt to get some money out of Apple.
 
One of the WORST decisions Tim Cook made was to get involved in this topic; he should be fired just for this. It's obvious someone would file a lawsuit in the future based on Apple's involvement. You shouldn't hold a company accountable for some sickos misusing a product. What's next? Knife manufacturers being sued for stabbings?
 
If they can scan for one thing, they can scan for something else. I don't like child porn. Those who create it should be punished in the most extreme way possible. Those who view it should suffer a fate almost as bad. The problem is, I don't trust what the incoming administration will do with this technology. What will they force Apple to do? Will saying nasty things about the Dear Leader be a thought crime? If not in the upcoming administration, perhaps the next.

Note:
This is the political forum and my post is directly relevant to the question being discussed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.