Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
64,970
33,123


Apple is facing a proposed federal class action alleging that it records users' mobile activity without their consent and despite privacy assurances, in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, reports Bloomberg.

appleprivacyad-cleaned.jpg

In a lawsuit filed by New York citizen and iPhone 13 owner Elliot Libman, Apple is accused of "utterly false" assurances that users are in control of what information they share when they use its stock iPhone apps.

Specifically, the class action claims that Apple mobile device options to disable the sharing of device analytics and opting out of settings such as "Allow Apps to Request to Track" do nothing to stop Apple from continuing to collect data relating to users' browsing and activity for monetization purposes. From the complaint:
Apple records, tracks, collects and monetizes analytics data—including browsing history and activity information — regardless of what safeguards or "privacy settings" consumers undertake to protect their privacy. Even when consumers follow Apple's own instructions and turn off "Allow Apps to Request to Track" and/or "Share [Device] Analytics" on their privacy controls, Apple nevertheless continues to record consumers' app usage, app browsing communications, and personal information in its proprietary Apple apps, including the App Store, Apple Music, Apple TV, Books, and Stocks.
To back up its allegations, the complaint cites a recent Gizmodo report covering the work of security researchers at the software company Mysk. Earlier this month, researchers Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry claimed to have found evidence that the analytics control and anti-tracking settings have no obvious effect on Apple's data collection in the above stock apps.

For example, according to the researchers, the App Store app continually harvested a wealth of usage data in real time, including user taps, apps searched for, viewed ads, and how long a user looks at any given app. Along with these details, Apple is also allegedly able to gather details typical of device fingerprinting methods, including ID numbers, device model, screen resolution, installed keyboard languages, and internet connection type.

In another example, the Mysk researchers said the Stocks app sent Apple a user's list of watched stocks, stocks viewed or searched for (including timestamps), as well as a record of news articles viewed in the app. This information was said to be sent to a web address via a transmission separate from the iCloud communication necessary to sync user data across devices.

"Opting-out or switching the personalization options off did not reduce the amount of detailed analytics that the app was sending," Mysk told Gizmodo. "I switched all the possible options off, namely personalized ads, personalized recommendations, and sharing usage data and analytics."


The researchers uncovered these findings using a jailbroken iPhone running iOS 14.6. Notably, while the team discovered similar iPhone activity on a non-jailbroken phone running iOS 16, the data was encrypted and it was therefore not possible to determine exactly what it contained. This limitation has not prevented the findings from instigating a lawsuit, however.

"Through its pervasive and unlawful data tracking and collection business, Apple knows even the most intimate and potentially embarrassing aspects of the user's app usage — regardless of whether the user accepts Apple's illusory offer to keep such activities private," reads the complaint. We've reached out to Apple for comment and will update this article if we hear back.

Article Link: Apple Hit With Class Action Alleging It Tracks Users Despite Privacy Assurances
 

Tofupunch

macrumors 6502
Dec 4, 2014
406
610
Wow. This could completely undo the trust people place in apple. Privacy is one of the biggest reasons why I continue to buy apple products. If the allegations are true, then they’re worse than Google and Amazon - at least they're upfront about the data they collect! 😨🫣🤥
 

MJaP

macrumors 6502
Mar 14, 2015
294
1,225
I always got the feeling that Apple were no more trustworthy as far as data COLLECTION was concerned than Google or Meta or any other technology behemoth. The only difference with Apple is they like to keep all that information (and the market power that comes with it) to themselves rather than sell it on to whoever waves a large sum of cash in front of them.
 

JM

macrumors 601
Nov 23, 2014
4,083
6,377
At this point, maybe I’ll sue Apple as well 🤷‍♂️

For like, giving me only four color options on the pro. I feel it is discriminatory against the color orange and taking away my rights to an auburn colored phone.
 

tomnavratil

macrumors 6502a
Oct 2, 2013
876
1,588
Honestly, I agree the wording is quite poor on Apple's part and can be improved but basic analytics is well-described in terms of use/privacy policy for iOS itself as well as outlined through the individual app's privacy labels. However, Apple did not track users beyond what they've agreed to. As simple as that.
 

Quantumodi

macrumors newbie
Nov 1, 2022
8
24
I always got the feeling that Apple were no more trustworthy as far as data COLLECTION was concerned than Google or Meta or any other technology behemoth. The only difference with Apple is they like to keep all that information (and the market power that comes with it) to themselves rather than sell it on to whoever waves a large sum of cash in front of them.
None of the tech behemoths “sell” your data. They use it to (anonymously) link third parties (advertisers, sellers etc) to those most likely to purchase from them.

If they actually outright sold that data they wouldn’t be the large data gatekeeper companies able to command huge amounts of revenue selling access to their profiles. This is a very common misunderstanding.

Essentially what you’re saying is that Apple (in showing personalised ads for example) is exactly the same as Google, Amazon etc. just that they don’t rely heavily on that business model & thus can claim they are “privacy respecting” (for now).
 

tomnavratil

macrumors 6502a
Oct 2, 2013
876
1,588
Wow. This could completely undo the trust people place in apple. Privacy is one of the biggest reasons why I continue to buy apple products. If the allegations are true, then they’re worse than Google and Amazon - at least they're upfront about the data they collect! 😨🫣🤥

This is nowhere the same realm to what Amazon and Google does. We are talking about selling and offering customer data to third parties for advertising vs. standard analytics that 95% of apps worldwide do.
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,638
Indonesia
I always got the feeling that Apple were no more trustworthy as far as data COLLECTION was concerned than Google or Meta or any other technology behemoth. The only difference with Apple is they like to keep all that information (and the market power that comes with it) to themselves rather than sell it on to whoever waves a large sum of cash in front of them.
Kinda agree, at least the assumption right now. Apple did say one time about their technique in making those metadata anonymized or something (forgot their naming). Nonetheless, first party collection, I can let it slide. I do know that iOS is more restrictive in what 3rd party apps can access to compared to Android.
 

phenste

macrumors 6502a
Sep 16, 2012
704
2,017
thank God. Apple deserves to be prosecuted for these utterly false and misleading claims. funny how this article showed up on my feed the same day I was talking to a friend about how every megacorp needs their scummy practices brought to light, “including my favorite”…

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.