Where did I say a *free* movie. Comprehend much?
Wow. Just wow.
In secret? LOL! He wouldn't have to be secretive about anything... he can just do it. (Yes, I'm saying exactly that) Do you really think CEO's go sniffling and whining to the BOD for every nickel they spend?
Cook can even order a new Apple Store in your trailer park if he wanted.
Um I didn't say you said "free movie", can you comprehend much? You said "Cook can do whatever he wants in the company and deal with the fallout later". I listed things he absolutely cannot do. One of the things I listed, is what other people have wanted in this thread: Apple to make a RW movie free. Look at my post, I did not say that YOU said you wanted a free movie. I just listed things Cook cannot do and just "deal" with the fallout later. So no, you need to comprehend what I said.
Yes, Cook cannot setup a charity and do whatever he wants. He does not OWN APPLE. The shareholders do. It is a public company. Shareholders want to know where Apple is spending their money, where they are losing profit, ... Cook cannot just do this without anybody else noticing and stopping him. It would be different if it was a private company and Cook OWNED Apple. Cook is just the CEO. it is a publicly owned company.
And no Cook cannot just demand a Apple Store in a trailer park. You know their are building zones, permits, government regulations, ...
A CEO cannot just do whatever they want. I listed things they cannot do, as in break laws and only offer employee's $1/hr, ordering money to be put elsewhere besides in the company/shareholders.
----------
To be fair Apple could give away anything from itunes for free if they wanted to, just like any other shop can, they would just have to cover the studios lost share for every copy given.
Why people think it would be some kind of tribute is what I don't understand....
I doubt that. I am sure there are laws, contracts, and other things to prevent this. The shareholders would have a fit. So you suggest it would cost apple MORE money just to release a free movie to please some of these guys that suggest that is the only way to honor his memory? Get real. It will make Apple lose money off every sale. And already being some of the top downloads/purchases currently, that would probably be A LOT OF MONEY at a loss. Being free means apple would get nothing from the movie. Therefore Apple would have to pay for the loss out of their own pocket. Therefore, they would lose money off every sale since they gain none, and need to pay from their own pocket. Tim cannot order such an action, the shareholders would have a fit.