How dare both sides be allowed to explain the pros and cons of the issue at hand! Censor Apple so those retail workers won’t ever know what they don’t know. Ignorance is bliss I guess.
Apple would still be allowed to explain its position, the only difference being that workers would be free not to hear it if they chose so.
"Freedom of speech" does not equal others have "duty to hear", so it would clearly not be censorship to prohibit the mandatory nature of the meetings.