Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Scooping up animations, because that's the only thing making moves these days. If you think it's bad now, we're not even into the worst of it. We're still getting movies that were in production when COVID hit. We're going to get a solid 12-15 months of stale entertainment. I'm finding that movies in the 2000-2005 region are old enough to where I've forgotten about them but still good entertainment.
 
Wtf, weinstein has nothing to do with Lasseter.

That’s such a strawman, as the prior poster stated.

That’s like calling me Hitler’s biggest fan because he commissioned Nazi propaganda “art.”

As reasoning adults we can make these distinctions.

I happen to think that Woody Allen and Mel Gibson are horrible people like Weinstein. Same with Bill Cosby. In all these cases, I also never found their content to my taste, even before they were outed as creeps and vile people. But, I can understand the people who love Woody Allen movies and Braveheart.
That's not what a strawman argument is. People these days are so confused about what a strawman is. A strawman would be if I responded to an argument you didn't make. You said you don't care about people's dirty secrets if you like their output, so I responded with the example of Weinstein who, by your logic, you'd be okay with giving a second chance because of his large volume of film output as a producer.
 
Lasseter has publicly apologized for his behavior. He said:



I don't believe people should be condemned and shunned for life for doing something that was not even a crime. Even criminals get released from prison (often early on parole). Give the guy a second chance and see if he has learned his lesson. I am glad that he is making films again and Apple is picking them up -- he is definitely a very talented person -- he has made many of my favorite movies. If Lasseter falls back into habits of bad behavior then I may think differently.
Sexual assault is a crime. I think the insistence from some folks here to give him a second chance is really weird, but your admission that he made many of your favorite movies probably explains a lot of your bias in his favor. One wonders if you'd feel differently if you were a woman working for him, and he groped you, and you couldn't do anything about it because he's the famous John Lasseter of Pixar.
 
I love Apple giving a second chance to Lasseter. If the content is good, that's all that matters. I've had it with cancel culture. Cancel culture needs to be canceled. Artistry should be held above the lives of the people who make the art. I don't care about all the dirty secrets and behavior by the many many low lifes in Hollywood. As long as their output is good, lay it on me.
Nah, how about instead we give a second chance to the women he and others like him have harassed out of the industry? How much great output and artistry have we lost because of that? No amount of creative output offsets being a toxic harasser.
 
I'm of two minds about this. The question is, is he really remorseful, did he go into behavior therapy, did he apologize and offer some sort of restitution to his victims, etc.? Or is he just sorry because he got caught?

I want to see people get another chance if they've truly turned themselves around and got their acts together... but I don't want people to get away with "just laying low for a while" and picking back up with what they were doing before. And it's hard to tell the difference, from the outside, until well after the fact.
 
Yeah this is another one of those vague stories where I didn't understand the disclaimer in the article because it never described why there would be one in the first place.

And that what makes this story so atrocious. It has nothing to do with the two movies Apple is interested in. By not stepping up and addressing Lasseter's issues directly in the story, and instead hiding it by putting it in the "Political News" category, guaranteed it would be a hit piece about Lasseter as his past leaked out. And here we are.

That's creepy. And very poor journalism.
 
Last edited:
;)

tenor.gif
That character being the "bad guy" in Toy Story 3, and how he acted, was supposedly an attack at Lasseter from the Pixar employees who all hated dealing with him. From an artistic perspective, it's probably not a reach to use the word genius (to anyone not old enough, it might be hard to understand how ground-breaking the original Toy Story was at the time, plus all the Pixar movies that followed), and I imagine he was close with Steve Jobs, going back to Jobs' time with Pixar, so I understand the Apple connection. But like others have said, to just ignore the actions is very surprising for Tim Cook, who is somewhat of a liberal icon, and also just poor journalism on the Macrumors front to not even give it a small mention in the article.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Santiago
Wtf, weinstein has nothing to do with Lasseter.

That’s such a strawman, as the prior poster stated.

That’s like calling me Hitler’s biggest fan because he commissioned Nazi propaganda “art.”

As reasoning adults we can make these distinctions.

I happen to think that Woody Allen and Mel Gibson are horrible people like Weinstein. Same with Bill Cosby. In all these cases, I also never found their content to my taste, even before they were outed as creeps and vile people. But, I can understand the people who love Woody Allen movies and Braveheart.
But people who like Ghost Dad should be shamed with or without any allegations against Cosby.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Ar40
Lol! Nope, that was not the case at all. The allegations are true unfortunately. I was disappointed too as he was one of the reason I got to do what I do as a profession but unfortunately its true.

I'm surprised that Apple is giving this a go. It almost feels a bit unfair considering how they acted in the past. Well, its all disappointing


The only allegations were that he occasionally gave co-workers “unwanted hugs.” Which is absolutely ridiculous. Sure, it’s probably appropriate to ask someone before giving them a hug... but cone on. He got booted for being a teddy bear.

Lasseter is a good guy, and I can’t wait to see his future films!
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: Santiago and Ar40
Sexual assault is a crime. I think the insistence from some folks here to give him a second chance is really weird, but your admission that he made many of your favorite movies probably explains a lot of your bias in his favor. One wonders if you'd feel differently if you were a woman working for him, and he groped you, and you couldn't do anything about it because he's the famous John Lasseter of Pixar.
Has he been charged or convicted of sexual assault? No. Enough said. If hugging is sexual assault then there are some Care Bears and a Disney Snowman named Olaf that should be charged, tried, convicted and locked up. If he sexually assaulted somebody then he must be convicted of that crime for him to be guilty of it (see Harvey Weinstein). I have not even seen charges filed against Lasseter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.