Yawn. Apple is behind the times again. Music is played out. Apple really needs to shift its focus to the medium of the 21st century, video.
Audio-less video? I think some of the new 21st century videos coming out have sound, but I'm no expert.
Yawn. Apple is behind the times again. Music is played out. Apple really needs to shift its focus to the medium of the 21st century, video.
Kind of like removing the CD/DVD drive from computers?
Progress..
Exactly what i was thinking. Everyone thought the macbook air was nuts not to have one when it was released. Look at the market now.
Anyone "across the pond" think the EU isn't going to like this? They already don't like the lightening port as a proprietary charging port.
If this means Apple is getting rid of the headphone jack, it sucks for those of us with older cars. I have to use an FM transmitter in my 07 Corolla. I got one with 3.5mm input to use with my iPod Classic and iPhone 5 depending on if it's a road trip or just around town.
Are you being sarcastic? Headphones that I could only use with my iPhone would suck (forget that they're Beats too), but it was a good idea to get rid of the DVD drives in laptops.
----------
The market could only use Lightning headphones if Apple were to let other companies use Lightning connectors, which they do not. Also, this is a "people thought the airplane would never work" argument.
Think different.
How about a cable/adapter that is 3.5 to lightning?
Not ideal but possible.
Is this the end of the headphone jack?
It was not a good idea to remove optical drives from ALL new laptops (and desktops).
And it should be BDXL.
Not in the slightest. If Apple were to go down that route, it would be a very silly idea.
That wouldn't solve the battery problem, and you'd then have to carry around an adaptor (assuming you even bought a phone with no 3.5mm port). You know what's ideal? The 3.5mm connector. No reason to mess with that unless you're going wireless.
----------
Remember that the headphone jack is used for more than just sound. Some docks use the headphone jack for stabilization since the lightning cable is too thin to support the phone.
----------
For the desktop: External drives are available for those few who use them. This does NOT mean that I approve of the new iMac design with its mobile components.
For the laptops: Sure, the Blu Ray drive would be great for removing and installing a second hard drive in its slot, but that's it.
There is already an optical audio combo port on the macbook pros. I wonder why they just don't use that standard already in place.
What governments want to do is reduce wastage. Including yet another adaptor does not acomplish this... now they will supply them with 3, or any number required to suit the end user's playback device. i don't see the big worry.
Nope, it is for quality. OI work in a shop and most of third party lighting accessories people come with are crap, even potentially damage devices, totally unreliable. Sadly certification and this security are a good thing because users are usually too stupid and still buy china cable and charger for 5$Headphones with a proprietary port and they're Beats. I can't think of anything worse.
This whole digital authentication thing on Lightning cables shouldn't even be legal. I've had perfectly legitimate Lightning to USB cables stop charging the phone, stop syncing, or something else. It's like HDCP on HDMI. Glitchy security mechanisms that end up screwing over consumers who play by the rules!
The funny thing is that these new fakes I bought from eBay work better than the "certified" ones from TJMax and such. $8 for 10 of them, indistinguishable from Apple's cables, and working 100% of the time. They even came in the same plastic wrapping that Apple uses. In fact, I was a bit suspicious.
Because Lightning can do more, for example, the microphone function described in the article.
Oh look, an audiophile. No compliment.Lossless 48 kHz digital output is a huge deal -- with the right headphones and source material, it will *vastly* affect audio quality. Bravo, Apple.
Be honest, how many of us, on a regular basis, actually use headphones while charging an iDevice? That being said, I hopedoesn't charge an arm and a leg for a lightning to 3.5 adapter.
Nope, it is for quality. OI work in a shop and most of third party lighting accessories people come with are crap, even potentially damage devices, totally unreliable. Sadly certification and this security are a good thing because users are usually too stupid and still buy china cable and charger for 5$
Quality is important
Yawn. Apple is behind the times again. Music is played out. Apple really needs to shift its focus to the medium of the 21st century, video.
That you don't care about having a built in optical drive in a laptop does not mean everybody else agrees with you.
And the requirements of people that can do with wimpy ultra books like the rMBP don't matter to get rid of a whole class of laptops.
More interesting than the increase in audio quality is the fact that the headphones will be capable of controlling and interacting with the device.
You can imagine some headphones with a magic-trackpad-kind-of-surface on each ear where you can perform several gestures to launch apps or interact with the active application...
The market could only use Lightning headphones if Apple were to let other companies use Lightning connectors, which they do not. Also, this is a "people thought the airplane would never work" argument. There should be a word for that.