I think you're missing the point. Of all the issues with iOS, you'd think the stock music app would be the last on that list. Playing music on an iDevice used to be a simple, joyous experience but now it's become poorly-designed and convoluted to the point where you ask yourself "Apple designed this?" and "Did they really think it was ready to be released like that?"
Playing music on the iPhone has become so frustrating and aggravating that I no longer use my iPhone for music and I'm actively looking for an iPod classic to store my music and possibly downgrade from my 64GB iPhone (which has become unnecessary).
It seems like those having the biggest issues are people with large music libraries (either purchased from iTunes or imported from somewhere else). I don't have a large music library so I don't really have many issues finding and playing music in Apple Music. Of course I'm not defending the app/service in any way. I think the app is a mess, iTunes is worse and I still wonder exactly what Apple got for the $3B spent on Beats. Clearly Jimmy Iovine is not the right person to design a music subscription app/service.
Why does Spotify have a Twitter account? And one would assume a lot more people, especially non-techies use Apple Music than Apple's pro apps. Just because something should be easy to use doesn't mean it will be completely bug free and no one will ever have issues. It's probably easier/faster to have a few iTunes staff monitor a Twitter account than having people call customer service.It's not the Twitter account per se. The point is, the Apple Music app shouldn't need a dedicated support team. Final Cut? Absolutely! Logic? Oh hell yes! But Apple Music?
Last edited: