Rumors...this is probably the next iMac. I seriously doubt more monitors are coming in the near future.
Maybe a 30", but again (my guess) it is a iMac (or Pro).
Oh my sweet summer childThis can be just a software update for the current 27", right? It's got a A13 chip.
That will be of rather limited use unless they add multi-touch (which they won’t because macOS).
Apple is working on a new external monitor for Macs that also functions as a kind of smart home display while not in use, according to Bloomberg reporter Mark Gurman.
![]()
Writing in the subscriber version of his latest Power On newsletter, Gurman says that Apple is developing multiple new monitor offerings, some of which are likely to be successors to its Studio Display and Pro Display XDR, and one that could have smart standby features powered by an onboard iOS chip.
If Gurman's claim is accurate, it would not be the first time Apple silicon has been used in an external display. Apple already includes a dedicated A13 chip in its existing 27-inch Studio Display, but its functionality is limited to handling camera and speaker features like Center Stage and spatial audio when the display is in use.
Using an iOS device chip to power independent smart features when a monitor is idle would be an evolutionary next step, and could possibly rely on an expanded version the new Standby feature in iOS 17, which turns a charging iPhone in horizontal orientation into a home hub with full-screen widgets. As for when we could see the smart monitor, Gurman says not to expect a release until 2024 "at the earliest."
Article Link: Apple Is Reportedly Working on a Mac Monitor That Becomes a Smart Home Display When Idle
Or provide a remote, like my circa 2008 iMac came with.That will be of rather limited use unless they add multi-touch (which they won’t because macOS).
Voice. That's all I ever use with my Amazon Echo Show, and it has touch.How would you interact with it since it has no touch input or otherwise?
No, that is not an inherent requirement.Would have to be OLED to have this kind of "always-on" feature, no?
Apple already beats the industry on power consumption. You don’t think this always on display will use the low energy cores of the processor? How much power does your iPhone use and that’s always onThe rest of the industry is looking for ways to reduce power consumption. Screensavers gave way to standby, standby gave way to hibernate. Some day they may even result to actually permitting you to fully turn a device off.
Apple? Hey, let's stick a pseudo-computer in the display and make it an always active device.
Two words: Forced Upgrades.I don’t get why such feature can’t be implemented through a macOS software update, except if Apple wants this monitor to have a touch display
This is a very suburban POV.strange feature - few people have a Mac Display standing around in their living room.
Some however have wall mounted iPads ...
Reminds me of the days of the Macintosh TV. Lol. It was a black Mac that doubled as a TV.Depends on what this actually is. If it is just a way to run streaming apps without needing macOS booted (like the latest Samsung 4K and 5K displays can do), it could be useful for a dorm room or bedroom since it could double as a TV.
There are millions of people who believe the earth is flat.Seen several comments about "But it's not in a room where this would be useful."
Just because a feature is not useful to YOU, doesn't mean the feature isn't useful to SOMEONE.
Unfortunately, looking at where Dell priced its new 6K monitor, the more likely scenario is that the new Apple 7K monitor will be priced at $4,999 without stand, and the XDR will drop to $3,999 including stand.I just want the current XDR display at $2.5k and the nano/stand options at a max $500.