Move on to another problem? He has to stick to the main problem, which is Trump.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Joins Nearly 100 U.S. Firms to File Legal Brief Opposing Trump's Immigration Ban
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Move on to another problem? He has to stick to the main problem, which is Trump.
So you're quoting a source based on evidence gathered by RT AKA Russia Today AKA the propaganda arm of the Russian government, and this is after it has been alleged by the FBI, CIA etc that the Russians have hacked the US elections and after MI6 etc have accused them of doing the same in Europe.
Now usually I'd believe foreign sources as they don't often have an agenda, but that isn't clear in this case at all.
Yes, she did. "I didn't send classified information!"
Come on, stop being so f'in dense.
When it's unconstitutional discrimination that won't do anything to help security.
I think they are allowing this beacause it is a perfectly reasonable comment that doesn't attack any specific forum member.
That was a given the first post they made.
[doublepost=1486404996][/doublepost]
It's 0 relevancy, but keep parroting it, maybe someone will actually believe you someday.
She didn't knowingly do anything wrong. I take her word that she never sent any. She wouldn't lie under oath. Not a criminal and just a great public servant. Easily the toughest woman ever in politics.
If she didn't know, she's stupid and if she did know, she's a criminal. She doesn't win either way and she didn't.
Oh, the delicious irony. Just like she didn't send classified email, right? That's not a fact in your book. Do you guys realize how stupid you sound?
America is so divided because we have a media that is so slanted and bias with agenda, they only report portions of what is actually happening to support that agenda. We were just as, if not more divided under Obama, most people against him like myself just happen to have jobs and don't have time to go out and protest every time a president sneezes in the wrong direction. There is a double standard in this country that if there is a D on your name, you could do no wrong, if it is an R you could do no right. I was no fan of Bush, but when I saw them blame the man for creating a hurricane, something was very wrong
I personally don't have the patience for liberals that I know that feel that obnoxiously speaking louder and interrupting me, and pointing in my face while preaching about love on a political conversation makes their point more valid. I find I am part of the silent majority that voted Trump in, and there are obviously many more like me. You can bring up the 3 million popular votes, and remove California from that mix and he's got the popular vote. But I guess we should just hold an election and let California, Texas, and New York decide our leadership?
In the meantime if the liberal agenda worked so well, I guess they would had kept all the Senate seats and Governors of states that went Republican. Bottom line is, this country got fed up with all the talking points and total lack of action from our elected officials. We wanted something different, and we got what we wanted. Trump is delivering on the promises he made that got him elected, I find it refreshing to see a politician do what they say they were going to do.
Just to clarify something that everybody seems to be missing for some odd reason.....the travel ban is 90 DAYS. It is not permanent it is 3 months. The countries he included were chosen by Obama, he did not point to a map close his eyes and pick, Obama picked them. Why did nobody create this much of an uproar when Obama put a 6 MONTH travel ban on immigrants coming in from Iraq in 2011? Why the double standard? Why preach so much about love and inclusiveness while very deliberately making sure anybody on the side of Trump has no say or opinion vocalized or get immediately shut down viciously.
She knew what she was doing, some of us aren't that naive. Her followers though? Can't be anymore naive than that.
Not stupid and she apologized for using the private server. Honest mistake that did no harm to anyone.
Nope I would rather take her word under oath. She is a high character public servant afterall
.
And building a billion dollar empire like Trump on chapter 11 isn't?
Of course you would, you don't care about truth. She's a character alright. You've wasted enough of my time with your idiocy.Not stupid and she apologized for using the private server. Honest mistake that did no harm to anyone.
Nope I would rather take her word under oath. She is a high character public servant afterall
[doublepost=1486405705][/doublepost]
You do know what that IS, right? Of course not, you just want to bash Trump no matter what. It's clear.
Yes of course I would! Why would I believe some random Macrumors Trump supporter who claims to "have the truth". I believe the word from Hillary under oath.Not wasting my time and not an idiot.