That's extreme. If I was running a school, it would have nothing better than 2006 iMacs (G3s if they didn't use so much power). What the heck do you need a 3.3GHz dual core processor for in a school?
If public schools end up buying these, I will lose all remaining respect for any politician requesting extra school funding.
----------
Is that statistic real? I'm pretty sure a lot of schools in California at least use Macs primarily or a mix.
Yeah that's a BS statistic. My elementary/middle school used 100% Apple. And that was from like 1991 - 2000. I visit every once in a while and they are still 100%

----------
Umm, you know you cannot compare a Mac, which is a factory-built machine to a custom PC, right? This is same as you can never compare Bugatti Veyron's engine to a true purpose-built dragster's engine, but it doesn't mean Veyron's engine has to be junk.
Also why do Apple need to support an single OS for 10 years like M$? Apple is a company not a charity. Also I don't see a reason for not switching to Win 7, because of steep license fee or Windows 7 failed? I am not sure about license fee but sure Windows 7 is usable.
M$ may have very well technical support to their software and OS but if they cannot sell new OS to schools and enterprise this means M$ still fail.
The only reason M$ still offers support on XP is because they charge $80+ dollars per service call.