me neitherDid they pull the labels? I am not seeing them.
me neitherDid they pull the labels? I am not seeing them.
Me neither, unless the content is…well…transparent.Did they pull the labels? I am not seeing them.
not visible for me in UKDid they pull the labels? I am not seeing them.
In the US, in engineering at least, "thesis" is masters or, in some cases, senior year, and "dissertation" is PhD. At least usually.Are you getting a PHD?
Why is apple creating APIs to let devs collect that dataSo here’s a question, in iMessage, could developers of iMessage apps collect your data?
Neither in Canada..soo transparent it's empty!not visible for me in UK
From Canada as well. I needed to set my VPN to USA then they show up. On the US site of courseNeither in Canada..soo transparent it's empty!
Actually if I go to https://www.apple.com/ca/privacy/ the tab for labels doesn't exit
Nah. Facebook and Google would say "We already have more data, don't need or want yours. Thanks, we're good."What’s Apple going to do with your tracking data? Sell it to Google and Facebook?
Apple today updated its privacy website with a new "Labels" section that brings privacy labels for all of Apple's apps together in one place, making it easier for users to learn about how Apple apps handle their personal data.
![]()
Apple already provided privacy labels for its apps since the feature launched last year, but on individual support pages, so this new "Labels" section makes it easier to view the labels all in one place, and in alphabetical order. Privacy labels are available for Apple's apps across iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS, so some apps like GarageBand appear more than once. Apple has also included labels for developer tools like Xcode and even the App Store itself, providing a very comprehensive level of privacy information.
Apple emphasizes that users will not find any data under "Data Used to Track You" for its apps, as Apple does not track users. Apple says it holds itself to a higher standard than it does for all other developers, who will be permitted to track users if they obtain their permission via the App Tracking Transparency framework that will be enforced as of iOS 14.5.
Apple introduced privacy labels on the App Store in December, providing users with a broad overview of the data types an app may collect, and whether the information is used to track them or is linked to their identity or device. These labels appear in App Store listings for third-party apps and downloadable Apple apps like Apple Podcasts, while built-in apps that cannot be removed like Messages have labels on Apple's website.
Apple has required developers to fill out the privacy labels when submitting new apps and app updates to the App Store since early December, but the labels function on an honor system. Apple previously said it "conducts routine and ongoing audits of the information provided" and works with developers to correct any inaccuracies, adding that apps that fail to come into compliance may ultimately face removal from the App Store.
Article Link: Apple Launches All-in-One Web Page With Privacy Labels for Its Own Apps
I have just been informed by Apple, that you aren't fascinating enough online to track, Bob.Naturally, I thought this would all just work. So which is it? In this case are Identifiers and User Content going to be used to track me, or not?
View attachment 1742398
Tracking is defined as collecting data then sharing it with third parties.How does Search Ads get away with the tracking? They sell ads to third parties based on usage, location and a bunch of other data. Is it because Search Ads is technically "first party" so it doesn't count?
You bid for keywords, but you can also choose demographics to target; location, age, gender. Isn't that "tracking"?I though that for search ads developers pay for having their app at the top of the list when someone search for some basic keyword. Not that they track you in order to promote apps???? I might be wrong, that’s why I’m asking
Google and Facebook (outside of edge cases) just sell ads based on the data collected and that is considered trackingTracking is defined as collecting data then sharing it with third parties.
I’d trust more that this is a marketing blitz than Apple is actually doing something to protect customer privacy. But even this we have no proof. I would prefer not just go blind trust, but I guess most of the time we have no other choice besides not using smart devices from Apple google etc.Or at least pretending to. Who's to audit Apple? Could this be another marketing blitz to cover up the truth, like Apple is so famous for? I don't know.
Haha! The fools!I have just been informed by Apple, that you aren't fascinating enough online to track, Bob.![]()
Apple’s actions combined with their words should give them the benefit of the doubt. Its easy to be cynical and dismissive while doing nothing on your own. Apple has created very powerful and motivated enemies in response to all of this, so a logical person would believe that its unlikely Apple would be doing this if it wasn’t an action of conviction. Given Apple’s position on this topic, if the public caught them fabricating all of this information the Apple brand would pay a heavy price, and it would not be difficult for researchers to fact check them on this.Or at least pretending to. Who's to audit Apple? Could this be another marketing blitz to cover up the truth, like Apple is so famous for? I don't know.