Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
59,779
23,973



While rumors last week indicated that Apple would be launching minor updates to its iMac line, Apple today unveiled a new lower-cost 21.5-inch iMac starting at $1,099. Previously, the entry level iMac started at $1299.

cheaper_imac_2014_2.jpg
The new entry-level 21.5-inch iMac comes with a 1.4GHz dual-core Intel i5 processor, a 500GB hard drive, 8GB of memory, and an Intel HD 5000 Graphics chip for $1,099. Customers can also choose to include a 1TB hard drive, a 1TB Fusion Drive, or 256GB of flash storage on build to order options. All of Apple's other 21.5-inch and 27-inch iMacs are still available as well.

KGI Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo predicted last year and earlier this year that Apple would be launching a lower-cost iMac in 2014 to bolster sales in critical foreign markets.

Apple is also rumored to be working on Retina Display-equipped iMacs, as recent evidence in the OS X Yosemite developer preview suggested such models were in the works. While there is no specific release date for a Retina iMac, Apple could launch the new desktop computer later this year.

Apple's new entry-level iMac is available today through Apple's various retail locations and online store, and shows an availability of "within 24 hours."

Update 5:41 AM: Apple has issued a press release announcing the lower-cost iMac.

Article Link: Apple Launches New Cheaper 21.5-Inch iMac Starting at $1,099
 

ArtOfWarfare

macrumors G3
Nov 26, 2007
9,443
5,835
1.4 GHz in a desktop computer at this price?

Surely that's a typo...

Just checked Apple's store and it says the same thing.

1.4 GHz for $1099 or 2.7 GHz for $1299. They're the same line of CPU, so it's an apples to apples comparison. For an 18% increase in price, you double the CPU and the storage capacity. The GPU also changes, but it changes lines entirely so there's no easy way to say how much better one is than the other.
 
Last edited:

koulmj

Suspended
Mar 18, 2013
376
471
I wish they had this 6 months ago, I would have bought this to go with my iPad instead of a MacBook Pro:)
 

Reason077

macrumors 68040
Aug 14, 2007
3,315
3,096
To me it doesn't seem all that "low-cost" at $1099.

$999 would have been the price point to go for, but I guess it'll be available for that after retailer/educational discounts.
 

yjchua95

macrumors 604
Apr 23, 2011
6,725
232
GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
So let's see, we've got an early-2014 MacBook Air's guts in a 21.5" iMac. And a HDD.

And I guess this machine's for people who want the power of a base early-2014 MacBook Air in a desktop form factor.
 

pgiguere1

macrumors 68020
May 28, 2009
2,166
1,173
Montreal, Canada
They put a MacBook Air (15W) CPU inside a desktop computer meant for 65W CPUs? Without making it thinner?

Hmmm, pretty weird. Would have been cheaper for them to go with a less efficient, more powerful chip.
 

tomhumphrey

macrumors newbie
Sep 15, 2010
11
0
The fact that none of the iMacs come standard with a SSD at this point is shocking. I would never buy or use a computer without one now.
 

iMcLovin

macrumors 68000
Feb 11, 2009
1,963
898
july, and this is all apple can come up with?? not even an update to the i7 with 880m and the latest i7 processor with tb2 (that wouldnt be a complex update for them to do). geez I hope this and the MB air isnt part of what tim cook and eddy cue looks upon as a year of impressive product upgrades...effortless upgrades IMO.
 

Reason077

macrumors 68040
Aug 14, 2007
3,315
3,096
The fact that none of the iMacs come standard with a SSD at this point is shocking. I would never buy or use a computer without one now.

... which wouldn't normally be a problem except that these iMacs make it very difficult to open and replace the HDD.
 

BJonson

macrumors 6502a
Aug 26, 2010
866
147
For that price you could get a 11" macbook air and a monitor and get a PCIe SSD for free and have the portability if you need it. This new option makes no sense at all.
 

Abazigal

Contributor
Jul 18, 2011
17,551
18,123
Singapore
1.4 GHz in a desktop computer at this price?

Surely that's a typo...

I am looking at the Apple Store now. 1.4 GHZ (but apparently can turbo boost up to 2.7 GHZ, huh?). Definitely seems like a typo somewhere, I am paying for a mac mini with an integrated display?
 

Rogifan

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2011
23,518
29,829
july, and this is all apple can come up with?? not even an update to the i7 with 880m and the latest i7 processor with tb2 (that wouldnt be a complex update for them to do). geez I hope this and the MB air isnt part of what tim cook and eddy cue looks upon as a year of impressive product upgrades...effortless upgrades IMO.

This is just clearing the decks for retina iMacs this fall. :)
 

Revearti

macrumors member
Oct 29, 2011
71
66
When will Apple release touchscreen iMacs?

I agree with Steve Jobs on this feature. It gives a great demo, but it's ergonomically terrible.

Also, I wouldn't enjoy wiping finger prints off my monitor all the time. Touching a monitor will not be faster than a mouse.
 

Cougarcat

macrumors 604
Sep 19, 2003
7,766
2,553
july, and this is all apple can come up with?? not even an update to the i7 with 880m and the latest i7 processor with tb2 (that wouldnt be a complex update for them to do). geez I hope this and the MB air isnt part of what tim cook and eddy cue looks upon as a year of impressive product upgrades...effortless upgrades IMO.

Looks like they're just waiting for Broadwell.
 

mdgm

macrumors 68000
Nov 2, 2010
1,665
405
Still no new Mac Mini, but I expected they wouldn't release a new Mac Mini at this time.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.