Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
66,067
34,920


Apple's stock price today dropped amid a broader roader technology sector sell-off that has wiped out nearly $900 billion in market value (via Reuters).

aapl-logo-banner.jpg

Apple's stock fell by over 4%, largely influenced by Berkshire Hathaway's announcement that it has almost halved its stake in the company from 5.6% to approximately 2.8%, alongside escalating fears of a recession in the United States. The decision by Warren Buffett's conglomerate came as a surprise to many, given Buffett's long-standing endorsement of the company. The move was part of a broader strategy by Berkshire to raise its cash position to a record $277 billion, indicating a cautious approach towards the current economic environment and concern about the technology sector's resilience.

The "Magnificent Seven" technology companies in the United States (Apple, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Tesla) today collectively lost nearly $900 billion in market value due primarily due to concern about their volatility. Nvidia experienced a sharp decline of over 8% following reports of delays for its next-generation AI chips. Amazon and Microsoft also saw their shares tumble by 8.3% and 5%, respectively, amid growing concerns about the reliability and profitability of their cloud computing services.

However, some analysts still see cause for optimism about Apple's position in the market. In its most recent earnings report, Apple detailed a steep increase in services revenue at $24.2 billion, up from $21.2 billion a year ago. The introduction of Apple Intelligence later this year is also expected to support growth.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple Leads Tech Sector's Massive $900 Billion Market Loss
 
As always, zoom out your charts. Unless you're seriously trading day to day, it's way more important to look at a longer time frame. Here's the recent action in context.

Screenshot 2024-08-05 at 12.14.06 PM.png
edit: this isn't to say AAPL and others could fall a lot further -- this may well come to pass! But what looks like a full-blown disaster on a 1-day to 1-year chart may look a lot less disastrous when viewed out on the decade-scale timeline you expect to be holding the asset. If you have something in your retirement portfolio, for instance, you will probably regain a bit of calm by squinting your eyes and looking at the general shape of the chart over a decade.
 
Last edited:
We shall see how much of the marketplace claws its way back after this premarket sell off.

From CNN
Fears of a sharp slowdown in the US economy have raised expectations that the Federal Reserve will have to slash interest rates. Coming as the Bank of Japan takes its interest rates higher to contain inflation, that is boosting the value of the yen against the US dollar and making Japanese export-dependent stocks less attractive.
At the same time, tech stocks are being hammered by a combination of mixed earnings and increasing skepticism among some investors about the hype around artificial intelligence.
“The buzz is all about the contagion effect of this aggressive bear onslaught, underscored by fears of a hard landing in the US and a severe meltdown in Tokyo’s markets, which now appear to be self-perpetuating,” said Stephen Innes, managing partner of SPI Asset Management.
Trading was halted for short periods of time in Japan and South Korea as circuit breakers designed to prevent panic selling were triggered multiple times.
From 3 days ago
There’s been one big question on the minds of Wall Streeters this tech earnings season: When will anyone start making actual money from artificial intelligence?
In the 18 months since ChatGPT kicked off an AI arms race, tech giants have promised that the technology is poised to revolutionize every industry and used it as justification for spending tens of billions of dollars on data centers and semiconductors needed to run large AI models. Compared to that vision, the products they’ve rolled out so far feel somewhat trivialchatbots with no clear path to monetization, cost saving measures like AI coding and customer service, and AI-enabled search that sometimes makes things up.
 
Last edited:
Actually, Buffet's move is strange. Not exactly a vote of confidence. It makes you wonder why? Shuffling is one thing, this is not a minor shuffle though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stenik
Just a reminder that the Top 10% own over 90% of the Stock Market.

A lot of Stocks were inflated regardless. Some of these valuations are laughable so seeing it finally burst is actually refreshing. Though, I have a Finance degree so I'm obviously a bit biased lol
 
Things that go up must come down, happens with the stock market on a regular basis… we’ll have to see what the “AI” bubble is going to do…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stenik
Here's my armchair analyst assessment...

There's this sense that AI will revolutionize tech in the same way that the advent of the PC, Web, Web 2.0 etc. did, and I think markets and valuations have been pricing this in as revolutionary, but this is premature. AI will have an effect, but anyone who has used Microsoft CoPilot will understand how disappointing it is in current form. It can be magical, but it's more miss than hit in current form.

I see AI as an accelerant in the near term (e.g. I use ChatGPT, ClaudeAI daily) but I use it as an assistant than anything else. While remarkable, it's not quite there in terms of being able to replace jobs yet in my field. Some of this correction has to be due to the fact that it is going to be an incremental value driver, and not a revolutionary one.
 
I'm honestly surprised it's taken this long in the US for things to get dicey given the Democrats' lust for spending over the last few years and the Fed seemingly so unsure of itself when it comes to what they should do with interest rates.

EDIT: I never knew how many leftists were ironically also such diehard fans of a 3 trillion-dollar company. That is certainly an interesting overlap but I guess anyone can make anything make sense if they try hard enough to rationalize it to themselves.
 
Last edited:
Actually, Buffet's move is strange. Not exactly a vote of confidence. It makes you wonder why? Shuffling is one thing, this is not a minor shuffle though.
Buffet's move is not strange if you understand his investment philosophy and its trajectory. Right before he starting selling off, 43% of his portfolio was in AAPL. That became too big of a position for him. He also didnt time the selling right, not that anyone can always do that. However he did miss a lot of upside.

It's also important to note that when he was selling, the institutional investors were gobbling up AAPL. This is an important metric as well.

For the record I own both BRK-B and AAPL and have continued confidence in both.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.