That's a good thing, as it shows that South Korea is going through a dismantling of old ways. Paying a friend of a friend to help you with government red tape is common all over the planet. In the US we still do it, but semi-hide it by hiring people into civilian lucrative jobs afterwards.
In any case, it has zero to do with Apple and its carrier contracts.
That might just show that the US still protects Apple execs even more than Korea used to protect Samsung execs.
Some think Jobs should've gotten jail time for his stock scandal, same as other less fortunate execs of smaller companies. Others think he should've gone to trial for his secretive anti-poaching and other anti-trust plots.
But, just like used to happen with Samsung execs, Jobs was deemed too valuable to charge with anything. There's very little difference in the types of influence going on in both cases. Well, except Samsung actually is critical to South Korea's economy and defense, unlike Apple.
The mental gymnastics you go through to try and back your ridiculous claims us truly astounding.