Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Looking to Launch Lower-Cost iMac in 2014
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The iPhone 5c was never, ever announced as a cheap alternative. Tech bloggers and business analysts decided it was and publicized it like crazy, Apple themselves never once said that it was going to be cheaper.
Moral of the story: don't believe everything you read.
Wasn't there a production issue that resulted at less than expected?
I just don't see how they could possibly make the imac cheaper, this really is bad news...Apple always tried to make high quality stuff and sold it at fair prices, I don't want to see some cheapo imac variant ugh
I just don't see how they could possibly make the imac cheaper, this really is bad news...Apple always tried to make high quality stuff and sold it at fair prices, I don't want to see some cheapo imac variant ugh
You sure about that? Honestly asking. I though you couldn't directly compare arm to x86 benchmarks..
It's comparable to a 2010 MacBook Air. Yes, the difference is important, the 2011 MBA uses the Sandy Bridge CPU architecture which was a huge boost in performance and when the MBA became the "default" Mac in Apple's lineup.
I don't see them ever moving to ARM with Mac OS X simply because of the performance hit that comes with emulating a different CPU architecture. Any power efficiency gains which you would hope to have by going to ARM (and let's be clear, there really aren't any) will be lost with a performance penalty from emulation.
Really? a plastic phone with its predecessors hardware, that goes for $100 less, launched in parallel with a metallic 5S, which btw contains real upgrades and keeps the same price point as its predecessor... is not meant to be a cheaper iphone? So your theory is, because they didn't explicitly say it was meant to be a cheaper iPhone, the 5C is not - even when the phone itself implies it? Did they just intend to fulfill the deep desire of millions of consumers for plastic crocs-looking iPhone? Seriously...
Moral of the story: don't expect to read about everything you see. (of course Apple's ego wont let them publicly say they are putting out cheaper products!)
But I digress... IMO if Apple wants to go mainstream - past a 10-15% computer market share worldwide (currently they hold less than 8%) - they should do something really new in terms of brand positioning - instead of these half ass measures that just cheapen existing products but keep margins and prices high. If they don't want to do that, and keep being a premium product to justify those margins, then just stop messing around with the idea. But they just cant have it both ways: dramatically increase sales volumes and keeping the current margins and brand position. Thinking so seems as a strategy right out of Steve Jobs' legendary distortion field.
Last edited:
When you have a year old tech encased in plastic and crocs knock off, it's cheap by definition.
You're describing the Mac Mini Pro that's been previewed.
Except that the Mac Mini Pro (aka "trashcan") as previewed will start at $7999.
The major problem i see people not buying iMac i guess is it's upgrade-ability. I absolutely dont see the reason why Apple couldn't design the 21.5 inch imac like 27 inch where they can upgrade the ram. I always gave them feedback regarding it.
Companies need to understand this:
iphone: A more utility device but less productivity, which has a limited function. Apple can design a completely lockdown phone and still make it usable because they can guess all the possible usage of the phone in the entire world
iPad: A utility + Productivity Device which can be used in much more ways than what Apple can think of. Everyone's needs differ and may need a little specific hardware configuration for certain task. But a good powerful iPad might suffice to most of the people if not all.
Computers: These are COMPLETELY productivity device, Apple can never assume or guess all the possible usage of a computer. From someones laps to some ones Labs, from underneath ground to space station. It can be used anywhere and everywhere.
So, computers should be something that can be customized in Ram, Hard drive and Processing power to individuals needs. In the new iMac, all 3 are lockdown, atleast not an easy task to upgrade. Search a video to replace ram in iMac 2012, you will faint in the mid video, you have to start from the screen and then go deeper, every component and flex cable has to be removed just to upgrade the ram, I mean they could've easily give an opening from the back as in imac 27 inch.
For my needs, the higher version imac 21.5 inch 2012 is enough (that's what i have rightnow) but i need more ram cos i work on multiple application open at same time, it slows down like hell. If i monitor my activity i rarely pass 50-60 % of processor usage, 1TB hard drive is also enough, but i hit 8GB Ram with 20-30MB remaining and it remains like this rest of the day.
Companies need to understand this:
iphone: A more utility device but less productivity, which has a limited function. Apple can design a completely lockdown phone and still make it usable because they can guess all the possible usage of the phone in the entire world
iPad: A utility + Productivity Device which can be used in much more ways than what Apple can think of. Everyone's needs differ and may need a little specific hardware configuration for certain task. But a good powerful iPad might suffice to most of the people if not all.
Computers: These are COMPLETELY productivity device, Apple can never assume or guess all the possible usage of a computer. From someones laps to some ones Labs, from underneath ground to space station. It can be used anywhere and everywhere.
So, computers should be something that can be customized in Ram, Hard drive and Processing power to individuals needs. In the new iMac, all 3 are lockdown, atleast not an easy task to upgrade. Search a video to replace ram in iMac 2012, you will faint in the mid video, you have to start from the screen and then go deeper, every component and flex cable has to be removed just to upgrade the ram, I mean they could've easily give an opening from the back as in imac 27 inch.
For my needs, the higher version imac 21.5 inch 2012 is enough (that's what i have rightnow) but i need more ram cos i work on multiple application open at same time, it slows down like hell. If i monitor my activity i rarely pass 50-60 % of processor usage, 1TB hard drive is also enough, but i hit 8GB Ram with 20-30MB remaining and it remains like this rest of the day.
Apple going against the business model that jobs put into place. Make only a couple GREAT products. All these mini's, and c's and soon to be giants. It's getting crazy
A smart business model starts with a focused product line because of limited resources. Over time you're supposed to reinvest in the company and expand on your value proposition. They've been doing this. Steve Jobs was a part of this plan.
Last edited by a moderator:
Concentrate on the Mac Mini
Stop wasting time trying to cheapen the iMac.
The Mac Mini is supposed to be the gateway drug into Mac usage and it's just too expensive. They need to get the entry level price down from $600 to something closer to $400. Then they can sell it to the PC user who wants to give Mac a try by re-using his existing display, mouse, and keyboard.
It's just a hard sell for most PC users to tell them to give up the expansion slots and built-in optical drive of even the cheapest PCs and then pay $600 for that privilege.
Stop wasting time trying to cheapen the iMac.
The Mac Mini is supposed to be the gateway drug into Mac usage and it's just too expensive. They need to get the entry level price down from $600 to something closer to $400. Then they can sell it to the PC user who wants to give Mac a try by re-using his existing display, mouse, and keyboard.
It's just a hard sell for most PC users to tell them to give up the expansion slots and built-in optical drive of even the cheapest PCs and then pay $600 for that privilege.
I hear it will use colorful plastic instead of aluminum but only be priced $100 less while encompassing this year's technology. Then, apparently people will say "for only $100 more" and buy the aluminum one instead because it has the latest tech.
Maybe Apple created the iPhone 5c to sell more iPhone 5s. What you think?
Wow!
Really, so you must have been the guy I saw everyone laughing at at a Starbucks with an iMac on a table browsing away a while back.
I love you, man. but, perhaps, it's time to buy a portable.
Really, so you must have been the guy I saw everyone laughing at at a Starbucks with an iMac on a table browsing away a while back.
I love you, man. but, perhaps, it's time to buy a portable.
I totally agree with this. They need to lower the Mac Mini pricing. A $400 Mac Mini would be a great way for people to buy into OSX.
Maybe Apple created the iPhone 5c to sell more iPhone 5s. What you think?
I think this is true, but I also think it really helps sell last year's tech. A new packaging at least got people to try it. You didn't see mobile tech reviewers review last year's iPhone 4S in 2012, but in 2013, many people went to try the "new" iPhone 5C.