*uckerberg is an idiot. A very, very lucky idiot, but still an idiot.Zuckerberg is smart. Do whatever it takes.
EVERYBODY has bad AI.Apple has bad AI, Meta hires from Apple. So what is the result?
More people that say they "know AI" get hired? If poaching from a "bad" company suddenly makes you smart, there are issues. Net result... Lots of bogus AI.
Sending the guy that torpedoed their AI efforts to torpedo someone else’s.Oh Tim, what are you doing my dear boy
You’re probably right, but if you’re not…Let it be Apple. Let it be. Use other companies LLM models. Let them continue burning through billions of dollars. This is all going to crash and burn and Apple could get what it wants for pennies on the dollars.
Either way there is nothing that Apple needs that it cannot buy from these other's companies. All the major AI companies are burning through money and need any paying customers it can get to help with their efforts without going under. No one is making money on AI, and getting desperate like Meta has become make it doubly so. Let the morons on Wall Street talk. Remember the lying and trouble Apple got into the last time they panicked chasing AI? Not worth it.
There is "winner takes all" race to AGI. That's nonsense. The sooner everyone realizes this the better.
Yes it’s possible, but if Meta gets there from spending high dollars to get the top AI researchers and comes up with a drastically different/better approach, it’s very likely the industry will jump on the bandwagon.You’re probably right, but if you’re not…
The problem with this is with Apple's privacy first mindset and promises they will quickly be behind the competitors again that train their models off of privacy. Apple is in a very bad situation.Apple is one of the most cash rich companies in the world - i've no idea why they haven't just splashed out on purchasing Anthropic at this point.
Do that - change the privacy policy to match your own and wrap it in macOS and iOS from top to bottom to do anything the user could possibly think of.
iOS can continue to use the on board model for most basic tasks too - as it needs someway to do things offline.
Right? This is one area where Apple obviously needs a leadership change. If it happens naturally, all the better.Considering the state of Apple's AI efforts, it's hard to gauge whether losing high-level members of their team is actually a bad thing or not.
The reasoning models like o3 have become pretty good. And Siri is a really far cry from what agentic models are capable of nowadays. I'm generally leaning AI-sceptic, but LLMs have come a surprisingly long way since even just a year ago.What is ahead of Apple in terms of use for humans? Google is miserable at finding old articles with the AI. It's trivial to get ludicrous answers from Chat.