Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,028
36,845


Apple's new iPad Air contains the M3 chip, upgraded from the M2 chip in the previous generation, so how much better really is M3?

M3-Chip-Apple-Event-Slide.jpg

With the introduction of the M3 series in 2023, encompassing the M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max chips, Apple once again set new benchmarks in performance, efficiency, and hardware-accelerated capabilities. The transition from ‌M2‌ to M3 is marked by Apple's move to a 3nm process, among other key architectural improvements such as a completely redesigned GPU.

When unveiling the M3 chips, Apple mainly focused on how they compare to the M1 series of chips, rather than their direct predecessors from the ‌M2‌ series. Even so, the M3 chip represents an advancement over its predecessor, with the headline upgrade being the transition to a more advanced fabrication process that is just ‌3nm‌ in size, down from 5nm on the ‌M2‌ series of chips. This is evident in the M3's increased transistor count, jumping from 20 billion in the ‌M2‌ to 25 billion, a 25% increase that contributes to its enhanced capabilities.

Benchmark tests underscore this progression, with the M3 outperforming the ‌M2‌ by about 17% in single-core tasks and approximately 21% in multi-core tasks. In GPU performance measured by Metal benchmarks, the M3 exhibits a notable improvement of around 15% over the ‌M2‌.

The M3 chip introduces an all-new GPU architecture. This architecture includes Dynamic Caching, a breakthrough feature that optimizes GPU memory allocation and utilization, adapting in real-time to varying task demands. This enhancement not only boosts graphics performance for intensive applications but also bolsters the chip's overall energy efficiency. This is particularly beneficial for graphics-heavy tasks like advanced video editing, 3D rendering, and gaming. It also features support for AV1 video decode to provide more efficient and higher-quality video from streaming services.

Both chips support Apple Intelligence. Despite similarities in the 16-core Neural Engine between the ‌M2‌ and M3, the M3's adoption of a ‌3nm‌ process leads to more efficient execution of machine learning and AI tasks. Additionally, the M3 maintains up to 24GB of unified memory (in Macs only), just like the ‌M2‌, but leverages the new process for more efficient memory bandwidth utilization.

One other notable difference between the ‌M2‌ and M3 chips is their energy efficiency. The ‌3nm‌ fabrication process enables the M3 to achieve higher performance without a proportional increase in power consumption, making the chip particularly appealing for iPad users who value a balance between power and battery life.

Overall, the M3 chip is a notable upgrade from the ‌M2‌, distinguished by its higher transistor count, improved performance in CPU and GPU tasks, and superior energy efficiency. While the M3 offers clear advancements, the extent of its superiority does not necessitate an immediate upgrade for ‌M2‌ users, especially if their existing workflows are still completed comfortably. For new buyers or those upgrading from older models, the M3's improvements in performance and efficiency will be much more pronounced.

Article Link: Apple M2 vs. M3 Chip: How Much Better Is M3?
 
So, given a choice between the M2 iPad Pro and the M3 iPad Air you are saying that the M3 iPad Air is the better buy?

If you're looking at the 11" size, get the M3. If the 13", the Mini LED display may be enough to push me to the Air.

iPadOS will happily run on either chip as we know.
 
I have said, the soonest I can get my clients at home on AV1 hardware, I will do it. I am just bummed it didn't come with any other appreciable upgraded specs.

Just need the Apple TVs to fall in line. This will save me from having to add hard drives to my Unraid array for years as I downsize my files into highly efficient AV1 for Plex.
 
We're gettin old ;)
Found in my old tech cabinet last weekend, a MacBook (13'', late 2009) with a 2.26GHz Core 2 Duo and 4GB DDR3 RAM running MacOS is El Capitan (10.11.6). Plugged it in and it still seems to work. Surprisingly the Dock et al, don't really look that much different. It is quite a bit slower. Looks like it was last used in 2017 per the dates of old emails. . . But, it still runs.
 
There was a day /(decade ago) when a 2.4ghz Core2Duo was bleeding edge super fast. Now its pretty much worthless compared to today's offerings

The speed hasn’t actually slowed down. The real issue is that demand has increased—app sizes, memory requirements, and functionalities are no longer as simple as they used to be. As hardware gets faster, software also makes greater use of its capabilities, which means older hardware gradually struggles to keep up. This is why people often say, "If it still works well enough, don’t rush to upgrade"—and there’s a good reason for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayUltimate
I’m puzzled… I have to upgrade my 3+ years old iPad Pro M1, and before buying an overly expensive iPad Pro M4 I was looking for this new Air refresh…
The use of a 2023 SoC in a 2025 product that will cost me a little less than €1200 (keyboard included, for a 256 GB model) is a little bit underwhelming.
I will end up spending €1500 for the M4 Pro, at the end…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Firestorm007
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.