Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would gladly help to make Apple maps better, so as many others. Unfortunately there is no option to report.
same here. guess the idea to make Apple Map available on web is to open it to public for crowdsourcing.

While Apple Map is good at navigation and better layouts, it has been far behind Google Map in POI supports and merchant info and reviews.

with crowdsourcing, i am expecting Apple Map will catch up sooner or later.
 
Weird, I thought it was already on the web. When I use DuckDuckGo the maps results were powered by Apple Maps. Think it's been that way for a while. I guess they didn't have a dedicated page you could go to before...is that the difference? I refuse to use anything Google anymore with how privacy deprived they are. Especially when people were being falsely arrested just because Google pinged them near a crime scene.
yes. for now it looks like not much different from accessing it from duckduckgo.

however, according to the apple 's announcement, the map will add more features in the forthcoming months, e.g. look around. i am expecting the web map layouts should be revamped to be inline with those seen in mac/ios.

it looks like a positive move... heading to support crowdsourcing, i guess.
 
There is in the iOS and Mac apps, and they're very good at responding and changing things. But unfortunately they've left this out of the web interface. Again, though, it is a beta so we can't take every omission as a permanent thing.

But as far as POI data, Apple truly needs to acquire some kind of high quality and up to date database. Crowdsourcing is all well and good, but they have a lot of catching up to do to get anywhere close to Google's data in terms of detail, currentness and completeness.

I love Apple Maps and have been using it daily for years now -- but I still have to open Google Maps if I'm looking up a retail business of any kind because Apple Maps is too often missing things or has old info. I submit stuff when I can, but honestly it's a little time consuming and it's not like I'm getting paid.
right. it looks like they are moving to support crowdsourcing, hence making it open to web...
 
You are aware that OpekStreetMap exists (and it's used by Google and apple) and there are tools to easily add details to the map (crowdsourcing) like brilliant StreetComolete on android?
Yes, I’m aware of OpenStreetMap. I was talking specifically about Apple Maps in this case. While it’s currently possible to submit edits via the iOS app, if/when they enable editing through the web, I think crowdsourcing for POI info for Apple Maps will see higher awareness and adoption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artifex
I don't know, it still seems pretty much useless here in Europe. At least compared to other options.

If you walk or bike or ski - Mapy.cz
If you drive - Waze.

At least for me. ;)
I used Apple Maps a lot throughout Spain a few years ago and it worked quite well. Also in part of the UK earlier this year, I used it for transit and it totally got me where I was going. I'm sure it varies country to country though.

In my experience, same caveats as in the US: good for transit, good for navigation in general -- but less current and thorough place data than Google Maps.

I'm sure Waze is good for driving, but the ad-infested interface is horrible and I just never touch it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoGood@Usernames
with crowdsourcing, i am expecting Apple Map will catch up sooner or later.
I still hope they buy up a good, current database.

Crowdsourcing is great, but quality can really vary. I mean, I submitted my town's library hours carefully and they updated them, which was great -- but I could just as easily have done it wrong. Did they have someone on their end go onto the library's website and verify? I doubt that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: artifex
I find Apple Maps better for actual navigation in the car, but if I'm looking up something when not moving, google maps is still a LOT LOT better. No need to ever look at Apple Maps while not actually moving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Weird, I thought it was already on the web. When I use DuckDuckGo the maps results were powered by Apple Maps. Think it's been that way for a while. I guess they didn't have a dedicated page you could go to before...is that the difference? I refuse to use anything Google anymore with how privacy deprived they are. Especially when people were being falsely arrested just because Google pinged them near a crime scene.
I guess they just use an Apple Maps API. That's how it works for most websites.
 
As much as I hate to say it, I really don't see the point in this? Google sadly have got the maps part sorted. I know it is Beta, but I presume Applke Maps itself have been going for a while, there is no cycle option in the U.K
I’m surprised UK haven’t got the cycle option yet? Here in Norway it was recently introduced and UK usually get all things Apple much earlier than here.

It was the last thing that I used Google Maps for. I try occasionally OSM but there are too many stupid and fake information there, especially when I go abroad. I tried also their bicycle overlay, but it seemed to be high jacked by some Ukraine vs Russia groups, and totally destroyed.

I see that Apple Maps have got more points of interest added in and roads and businesses are more up to date. But the same is also that more and more noise and fakes have popped up.

Google Maps have mostly stale data.

I used to like OSM, but I realise that we don’t really deserve nice things!
 
Useless. Lack of detail.
My test case is Varenna, Italia (on Lago Como) because many of the passageways are not streets.
Apple maps on the web shows nothing.
 
Too bad it does not work in Firefox as that is my main browser. Also, how/why did they make it not work cross browser?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Mostly I'm surprised (a) Safari didn't ask for my location find me when I got to the page--although I have to make sure I don't have any location-block turned on. And (b) it doesn't offer the option to sign in and see your own guides and favorites, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Too bad it does not work in Firefox as that is my main browser. Also, how/why did they make it not work cross browser?

Different browsers can use different rendering engines (Blink, WebKit, Gecko, etc.) and have different web development requirements. It appears Apple chose to initially (in beta) focus on the most popular browsers/engines. Firefox's global desktop browser market share is only around 6% to 7%.

I assume Maps will eventually work on Firefox, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
100% agree with your sentiment here. They're located in Cupertino and have access to incredible web app dev talent + vision, yet they consistently under-deliver or never-deliver when it comes to pure web app products. A team of 10-20 of the best JS devs you can find could probably pump out absolutely incredible web products.

The irony is that Apple led the web industry into huge innovations like progressive web apps, then subsequently downplayed the entire thing. It's baffling to me.
Remember when the first iPhone came out, and there wasn't an App Store, and the idea was everyone would just use PWAs? (Link to Youtube excerpt of June 2007 presentation by Steve Jobs) But then they built one after all, and the App Store came out, and they started raking in fees. And now, "...with the second beta of iOS 17.4, Apple disabled much of the functionality of Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) in the European Union. iPhone users in the European Union can access websites directly from the ‌Home Screen‌ through a bookmark, but PWA features won't be available." (Link to a Natively blog. An actual developer will need to confirm if this is still the case, but the intent looks suspicious even if they reverted).

Since Google has put ads in their maps, maybe Apple has decided it's worth developing theirs as a general PWA as well. If so, that might even explain why they're not rushing to add Firefox support, given the extra ad-blocking you can make it do with addons. Meanwhile, DDG pays for their API use, and it just works.
 
But why? Google Maps is excellent and have many more years of map information.
A lot of people don't trust Google much. And also many of their maps kind of look like crap next to Apple's.

I think this is pretty representative. Google's map has more business info, which is clearly their strength, but the map itself is ugly, cluttered, and is missing a lot of detail that Apple has.

Screenshot 2024-07-23 at 9.17.14 AM.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: atsang
There is in the iOS and Mac apps, and they're very good at responding and changing things.
That has not been my experience. A few months ago I noticed that a small coffee shop was listed in the wrong location within a shopping center on both Google Maps and Apple Maps. Apple also has it listed as Permanently Closed, which it certainly is not. I submitted corrections to both at that time. I got a canned reply from Google thanking me for the submission, and a week or two later I got another message that they had fixed it. I checked and confirmed.

I have heard nothing from Apple and the errors are still present. I have no connection to the shop except as a customer, but Apple is doing harm to a small business by incorrectly listing it as closed and refusing to correct the error when notified.
 
I have heard nothing from Apple and the errors are still present. I have no connection to the shop except as a customer, but Apple is doing harm to a small business by incorrectly listing it as closed and refusing to correct the error when notified.
Yeah that's not great. I have always gotten a response in like a week or two at most. Weird.

Ideally the business itself would use Apple's form to claim the business, but I don't think a lot of them have Apple Maps on their radar at all (aside from just being busy running their shop).
 
A lot of people don't trust Google much. And also many of their maps kind of look like crap next to Apple's.

I think this is pretty representative. Google's map has more business info, which is clearly their strength, but the map itself is ugly, cluttered, and is missing a lot of detail that Apple has.

View attachment 2399881
If you zoom in closer you get more details than what apple has lmao
 
  • Like
Reactions: interstella
Are you sure? DDG went live with Apple MapKitJS 5 years ago: https://www.macrumors.com/2019/01/15/duckduckgo-integrates-apple-maps/
That long ago? I must be misremembering the timeline. I didn't try to go full cold turkey (except for mail*) off Google until recently so I was still generally looking stuff up using their Maps on my phone. Now I look up directions a lot more in a browser.

*off-topic for this thread, but I'm definitely becoming interested in just paying Proton or someone for domain mail. Possibly even Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.