So are you just hoping for your curiosity to be eased, or do you want to see your government force companies to sell at a price they don't want to sell at? And why would any company want to show the world their pricing and distribution costs? For what it is, Apple is able to sell the iPad rather inexpensively compared to competitors, and I'm sure the competitors would LOVE to see where Apple spends every penny, in hopes that they can mimic or improve on such structures. I fail to see my any company, when asked this, wouldn't politely tell the one asking to GFT.
You can't think of any other reason? Let me throw a few out there off the top of my head:
- Digital Distribution while cheaper, is still not free. DataWarehouses and Bandwidth cost money. Maybe servicing Aus costs more money?
- Licenses fees. If a company has to license a technology or name from a local company in order to do business in Aus.
- Lawsuits. Maybe Aus laws or its people promote lawsuits that cost a product on average more money.
- Governments making silly legal inquiries. When a companies lawyers have to show up to court to defend their business, that costs the company money in that market. You should expect that cost to be reflected in that market's new sale price.
How is this an automatic win? What if they come back and the price is 100% justified, and they tack on another 1% to the price of all goods because of having to defend against this legal action? How would that be better? And it's certainly not a win for me, as Adobe doesn't make anything that I think is worth the money. And you know what I do about it? I use other products, like GIMP, which falls within reasonable value for me.
In other news, I'm going to walk down to my local small corner store and demand that they tell me why beer costs 30% more there than at the big grocery store a couple miles away.