Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
wow, big diss to Intel :p I can't understand how Apple can do this, considering Apple's big thing has been "our things just work", not "high-performance" - nVidia had that big manufacturing flub with a rather large number of their chips including, as I recall, some that were in MacBook Pros? Intel has been making extremely reliable chips for some time now.

Obviously, you don't understand the need for 3D in the 21st Century or you'd never post something so absurd. What good is reliable if it can't run anything? It sounds like someone finally clued Apple into the fact that they're the laughing stock of the computing world having their #1 selling computer have absolutely no 3D power what-so-ever, which is simply unforgivable in 2008 and has utterly destroyed Apple's once reputation for graphics. It's high time they finally started doing some repairs to that reputation.

Of course, now that they've supposedly improved graphics, my new problem is the apparent lack of a firewire port. I want to use the laptop with Logic Pro and my Roland digital piano workstation and guitar and microphone setup which means I need an interface box to the laptop and I would have preferred it be firewire (PreSonus or something similar), but given the potential savings in money compared to an MBP (would pay for the interface AND the Logic Pro software), I'll have to consider USB instead, I suppose. Given Apple's prior push for all things Firewire, they sure seem to be ditching it as fast as they can these days. It's too bad USB 3.0 isn't ready. That would pretty much make Firewire moot.
 
Looks like it has FireWire 800 to me - port down from the MagSafe. Unless it is a GigaBit ethernet port. However, I'd assume Apple would provide a USB-Ethernet adapter, rather than throwing away a FireWire port.

161931.jpg


Maybe.. but the symbol above the port is the same as the one above the current Ethernet ports.
 
no firewire would suck for a lot of people...I don't see it happening...

of course, we're saying this under the assumption that these pics are 100% legit...

and what of the other side of the macbook? are there any pics of the rights side? any chance of firewire ports being located on that side? :confused:
 
The shift to NVIDIA's chipset is definitely interesting. I think is provides a much needed incentive for the manufacturers to continue compete. Let's face it, the Intel chipsets in mobile computing has gone essentially uncontested for many years. I realize that many MPB owners are understandably worried about NVIDIA products and their recent track record.

It will be interesting to see what the final configurations are for the MacBook (et al).

At least we can enjoy the many pages of speculation and bickering that is occurring on a minute by minute basis to occupy our time until the "event" on Tuesday.

Enjoy,

Mark
 
What I am really hoping for with this new chipset is that the user can specify how much RAM they can use for VRAM for the graphics. :cool:
 
no firewire would suck for a lot of people...I don't see it happening...

of course, we're saying this under the assumption that these pics are 100% legit...

and what of the other side of the macbook? are there any pics of the rights side? any chance of firewire ports being located on that side? :confused:


What's interesting is there was a spec for Firewire 800 (IEEE 1394c-2006) published in mid 2007, but hasn't yet been used in any products for Firewire using an RJ45 connector with auto-negation for either Ethernet or Firewire.

Maybe Intel wasn't keen to add support in the chipset, nVidia might have jumped at it or been cheap enough (cost and power) to have a Firewire/ethernet chip that did support.

Sure would make an interesting option Macbook you get one FW or ethernet. Macbook Pro you get a dedicated FW and a combo port
 
I love the possibility of Nvidia chipsets in in the macbook. Maybe LED backlighting too?
 
I think it is a risky move. I could not find a single laptop using mcp79 chipset. So apple is essentially doing beta testing for Nvidia. Looking at recent track record of NVidia, I would say it is a bad idea.

I hope it works out. That would force intel to introduce better Integrated GFX.

Nehalem integrated GFX will not be from larabee. It will use something in the range of x4500.

I dont know why Apple did not consider using montevina with low end dedicated gfx. With hybrid gfx support in montevina, apple would have the best of both worlds.

Ideally they should have adopted AMD puma platform for macbook while keeping montevina platform for pro.
 
Ipod

I recently bought Ipod classic 80 gb. It's very unfriendly ti user.
How can I turn it to player which recognises music inserted directly from Windows explorer
 
I could not find a single laptop using mcp79 chipset.

Of course not. The NVidia MCP79 isnt out yet. In fact, it is suppose to Debut with the New Apple Notebooks on 10/14, and be announced to the rest of the PC world on 10/15.
 
I recently bought Ipod classic 80 gb. It's very unfriendly ti user.
How can I turn it to player which recognises music inserted directly from Windows explorer

1. This thread is about "Apple Migrating to NVIDIA Chipsets in new MacBooks", you should at least have asked in an appropriate thread (i.e. at least iPod-related).
2. You can't really manage music from Windows Explorer (you'll understand why once you start using metadata and doing smart playlists in iTunes).
3. You need to use iTunes (which is a free download) to manage music on your iPod. iTunes will also manage the music on your computer.
 
Remember Apple said something about a product transition? I think this is it, all of Apple's computers will be moving to nVidia chipsets.
 
Well, so much for the supposed "special" relationship that Apple had with Intel.

From now on, Dell will be selling the latest, fastest chips before Apple gets a chance to even test them.
 
Well, so much for the supposed "special" relationship that Apple had with Intel.

From now on, Dell will be selling the latest, fastest chips before Apple gets a chance to even test them.

I can't believe so many people are UPSET that Apple ditched those crappy Intel integrated graphics. It's unreal. I think some of you really do believe that 3D graphics and OpenGL performance don't mean a thing. In light of BootCamp and Parallels/Fusion, I would think more people would be THRILLED that the #1 selling Mac is FINALLY going to be a usable computer in 2008. It was worthless for all 3D stuff until now that dated after 2004. Apple will no longer be a laughing stock for 3D. But apparently some of you would prefer that status to continue just to keep Intel happy.... LOL.

I mean you do know a 2001 PowerMac is just fine for browsing, right? You don't NEED real power to run a browser. So if that's all you guys do with your Macs, then you shouldn't be concerned about Intel CPUs because you don't NEED them. For those of us that would like to run 3D software and even some 3D games, this is nothing but GOOD news.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.