This is very cool! Classical always feels like a world of its own so it's nice to be guided while listening. Well done Apple.
What do you mean they “don’t accept classical albums anymore?”I produce classical music albums. Apple does not accept classical albums anymore from any distributor (I tried them all). I read somewhere that Apple pretends not making money with music distribution (lol). Don't misread me: I love the Apple Classical App - though, like others, I'd love to see a Mac version of the App. But I seem to get mixed messages from Apple. Refusing all classical music albums from distributors gave me the impression that Apple wanted to dismiss the whole idea. Then, I read this article mentioning about new features. I'm confused.
Well, you have the Sing mode, Spatial Audio, the radio programs they do with artists, curated playlists… not all of them are new but I’d say it has everything a Music app needs to have but… the weekly playlists. I don’t know if I’m dumb or something but I can’t find a feature like the weekly Spotify playlists based on genres I listen to.I think it stings even worse because of all of Apple's proclamations about how they cared about and understood music when they launched the service and brought in some big names Jimmy Iovine, Dr. Dre, and Zane Lowe.
As it stands, it's a good-enough, basic music streaming service with nothing particularly novel, fun, or engaging about it - and a complete dearth of any type of meaningful innovation.
Not exactly the ode to music Apple made it out to be.
While I absolutely agree with you, until Apple get's it's feces assembled you can Airplay directly to your Apple TV from your iPhone or iPad. It's a clunky workaround but it sounds excellent.As a classical music lover, I was super excited when they announced this app. But in reality, I don't use it at all. When I listen to classical music, I don't listen on my AirPods or stream it from my phone. I listen properly in my living room hi-fi connected to the Apple TV; and as long as there is no native app, it is practically useless.
I'm quite surprised they are not aware that this is the case with many potential users for this app.
I assume that means Apple is dealing directly with the record labels. No need to go through a distributor.What do you mean they “don’t accept classical albums anymore?”
Like they’re not putting new albums in?
See above.I produce classical music albums. Apple does not accept classical albums anymore from any distributor (I tried them all). I read somewhere that Apple pretends not making money with music distribution (lol). Don't misread me: I love the Apple Classical App - though, like others, I'd love to see a Mac version of the App. But I seem to get mixed messages from Apple. Refusing all classical music albums from distributors gave me the impression that Apple wanted to dismiss the whole idea. Then, I read this article mentioning about new features. I'm confused.
Not sure why people need this as a standalone Apple TV app. Very simple to stream via AirPlay from iphone....I send to an old Gen 1 Apple TV, digital output to my Topping DAC into my integrated amp.As a classical music lover, I was super excited when they announced this app. But in reality, I don't use it at all. When I listen to classical music, I don't listen on my AirPods or stream it from my phone. I listen properly in my living room hi-fi connected to the Apple TV; and as long as there is no native app, it is practically useless.
I'm quite surprised they are not aware that this is the case with many potential users for this app.
Really? Just for starters it's a major PITA if the phone rings while I'm Airplaying Apple Classical through my large speakers. Not to mention the rushing to turn down the volume and fumbling with the lock screen to answer the call. Not ideal. Sure I could just ask Siri to answer the call (at full volume), but I tend to not want to broadcast personal calls.Not sure why people need this as a standalone Apple TV app. Very simple to stream via AirPlay from iphone....I send to an old Gen 1 Apple TV, digital output to my Topping DAC into my integrated amp.
Agree on the lack of innovation in terms of streaming part. But this classical music specific app *is* novel. Amazon, Tidal, Spotify don't have it. But its definitely niche.I think it stings even worse because of all of Apple's proclamations about how they cared about and understood music when they launched the service and brought in some big names Jimmy Iovine, Dr. Dre, and Zane Lowe.
As it stands, it's a good-enough, basic music streaming service with nothing particularly novel, fun, or engaging about it - and a complete dearth of any type of meaningful innovation.
Not exactly the ode to music Apple made it out to be.
Agree on the lack of innovation in terms of streaming part. But this classical music specific app *is* novel. Amazon, Tidal, Spotify don't have it. But its definitely niche.
The other thing Apple has going for it, is quality. They were not the first to do lossless or hi-res... but their "Apple Digital Master" (formerly Mastered for iTunes) program is a step above everyone else. More of a benefit of being a digital seller of music first, where quality mattered rather than a purveyor of an all you can eat music buffet first but that legacy that AM streaming inherited from itunes makes it stand out for me despite the relative lack of features of the client. Apple Music just sounds better than the competition. And I don't mean the codecs used, bitrate, etc. but the standards for mastering music for itunes and now Apple Music are not as high on the other streamers.
They did also heavily promote Atmos/Multi-channel music stream (technically not the first, I think Amazon beat them) but very close behind... so there is that.
Well, you have the Sing mode, Spatial Audio, the radio programs they do with artists, curated playlists… not all of them are new but I’d say it has everything a Music app needs to have but… the weekly playlists. I don’t know if I’m dumb or something but I can’t find a feature like the weekly Spotify playlists based on genres I listen to.
I mostly play my radio station but it’s annoying how it changes from modern pop music to maybe some flamenco from the 80…
Same with the mac, where I have a good dac and a decent pair of headphones.As a classical music lover, I was super excited when they announced this app. But in reality, I don't use it at all. When I listen to classical music, I don't listen on my AirPods or stream it from my phone. I listen properly in my living room hi-fi connected to the Apple TV; and as long as there is no native app, it is practically useless.
I'm quite surprised they are not aware that this is the case with many potential users for this app.
I don't get it.Pound for pound Apple Music is the most disappointing thing to come out of Apple in the Tim Cook era.
Had so much potential..
As a classical music lover, I was super excited when they announced this app. But in reality, I don't use it at all. When I listen to classical music, I don't listen on my AirPods or stream it from my phone. I listen properly in my living room hi-fi connected to the Apple TV; and as long as there is no native app, it is practically useless.
I'm quite surprised they are not aware that this is the case with many potential users for this
I get it, but this would be a deal breaker for me. Personal libraries are through Apple Music and if they separated classical out, I would lose all my classical music.Can I please get the ability the exclude classical music from the regular Music app?
Would be even better if it was granular and let me choose separately for crossover and actual classical music. But that I’m sure is not Apple’s style.
I don't really need listening guides but that's pretty cool. Seems like the Apple Classical programming team is doing some good work. I'm pretty sure there will be a Mac and Apple TV app soon. It's such a niche market though; I'm the only one I know that actually uses Apple Music Classical.