Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
62,097
28,029



Apple today announced that Apple Music has surpassed 20 million subscribers, reports Billboard. The service crosses the mark as it turns a year and a half old. Apple Music had 15 million subscribers on its one-year anniversary in June and notched 17 million subscribers a couple months later in September.

applemusic-800x410.png

Eddy Cue, Apple's SVP of Internet Software and Services, tells Billboard that 60% of Apple Music subscribers have not bought content from the iTunes Music Store in the last year. While a portion of that 60% are dormant users, Cue says "the vast majority are new customers." Additionally, 50% of Apple Music subscribers live outside of the U.S.

Cue also says that artists exclusive to Apple Music have hit milestones like the Billboard top 10 chart.
"It's been quite a year," says Cue. "We were thrilled to see that we could take [artists'] passions and drive them all the way to No. 1. Chance the Rapper, who we put on Apple Music exclusively, hit the top 10 on the Billboard charts [based on streams alone], and I can't recall that being done before."
In August, Universal Music Group banned exclusive music streaming after the debut of Frank Ocean's "Blonde" on Apple Music. Cue says that exclusive music will continue on the service "where appropriate." He says that exclusive launches work "well for everybody involved," including the label, artists and Apple. Cue notes that there's no across-the-board policy for exclusive launches, just that sometimes "it makes sense" to launch exclusively.

While Apple has traditionally aligned itself with rock acts like U2, Cue says the company has long wanted to give hip hop more exposure. The company has felt that hip hop was underrepresented in both iTunes and streaming charts, which is why the company has focused on hip hop acts more recently.

Apple's biggest competition in the streaming music space remains Spotify, which had 40 million subscribers in September, but the service continues to struggle as it attempts to become profitable. In August, it was reported the service was punishing artists who offered Apple Music exclusives. Spotify denied the claim.

Article Link: Apple Music Tops 20 Million Subscribers, Eddy Cue Says Exclusives Will Continue
 

ianKent

macrumors member
Feb 3, 2014
74
144
If all service providers include music streaming as a feature on all plans without counting towards data, they'll double the subscriber rate. Maybe Apple could negotiate on subscribers behalf?
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,346
3,369
If all service providers include music streaming as a feature on all plans without counting towards data, they'll double the subscriber rate. Maybe Apple could negotiate on subscribers behalf?

Why do you want them to go against net neutrality?
 

foxconn

Suspended
Sep 6, 2016
421
506
www
Why do you want them to go against net neutrality?

I hate when I read comments like this. If it's something that's going to benefit the consumer then why not?

Carriers already charge an arm and a leg for data, this could help ease the pain.
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,346
3,369
T-Mobile offering in he USA and Videotron offering in Canada where music streaming (not just Apple Music, but other apps also) doesn't count against your regular data usage is against net neutrality I suppose?

Against the principle, yes. Whether it is against actual regulations in the US and Canada, I do not know. I do suppose that T-Mobile needs to white-list certain IP addresses or analyse packets to differentiate them. Practically, T-Mobile won’t be able to white-list every possible provider, so they are making the selection for you, as they are favouring certain classes of media as well.

I hate when I read comments like this. If it's something that's going to benefit the consumer then why not?

It is only going to benefit certain consumers, specifically those that stream music and listen to T-Mobile’s white-listed providers. Not other types of media, not other providers. Who pays for the additional bandwidth, you think? On top of that, there are larger issues to this, so the situation is not an unequivocal benefit to ‘the consumer’.
 

Traverse

macrumors 604
Mar 11, 2013
7,685
4,379
Here
No interest in Apple Music personally, not that anyone really cares. However, I have been considering iTunes match lately. I wonder if they will keep that as a standalone service or eventually merge it into Apple Music.
[doublepost=1481085867][/doublepost]
Not other types of media, not other providers. Who pays for the additional bandwidth, you think? On top of that, there are larger issues to this, so the situation is not an unequivocal benefit to ‘the consumer’.

Indeed, it is a very slippery slope. I am okay with carriers making deals with some streaming services as long as it doesn't go too far. No data usage for Spotify? Okay. Not data usage for specific artists? No.

Also, it can be an open buy in. Making a deal with a large player is okau, but it cannot be structured like "all companies who pay x amout get this priority" which drives our smaller competition.
 

5105973

Cancelled
Sep 11, 2014
12,132
19,730
Eh, I don't like this "exclusives" crap. I get why they want it, but as a consumer I'm not a fan of it. But Apple Music does what I need it to do, so, I'm fine with it. I find that Amazon Prime and Google Play are somehow better at getting me to try new stuff, though. I never really did that on Apple Music.
 

Naraxus

macrumors 68000
Oct 13, 2016
1,917
7,814
Sorry Eddy but "free-bees" and spamming people to sign up for three months of rap & hip-hop along with vastly inferior music curation doesn't equate to a being "Quite a year".

As far as exclusives go it's clear that Cue and Apple/Cook as a whole have learned little from their iBooks fiasco. Keep up the exclusivity and strong-arming competitors out of the loop and we'll be seeing iBooks Lawsuit 2.0
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdillings

StayPuft

Suspended
Mar 22, 2016
264
355
Sorry Eddy but "free-bees" and spamming people to sign up for three months of rap & hip-hop along with vastly inferior music curation doesn't equate to a being "Quite a year".
Honestly, everything else aside, the terrible music curation is what keeps me away from Apple Music. I don't know why it's so awful. Sometimes it'll even play a random song that is completely out of place in the category of music being played ... like listening to a death metal station and a slow jazz song comes on, lol. I don't have this issue with other streaming services.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus

simonmet

Cancelled
Sep 9, 2012
2,666
3,663
Sydney
I'm only on Apple Music because my carrier gave it away for free with the plan (so not technically free but feels like it).

Not sure if it counts against mobile data though. I'm guessing probably.

Can't say I'd go out of my way to subscribe for lossy streaming music. Tried Tidal but the Hi-Fi (ie "standard" CD) tier was too expensive. Shame cause it was a better looking app.
 

Zirel

Suspended
Jul 24, 2015
2,196
3,008
Eddy is a cancerous wart figure and needs to go. #cuehimout #getcookout

Apple haters are ridiculous.

He is only the responsible for the biggest growths of Apple this year: services

So yeah, Cue him out. The people at Google and Microsoft, who can't even have 2 million subscribers, or half the countries and banks of Apple Pay are better! /s
 

Smartass

macrumors 65816
Dec 18, 2012
1,421
1,559
I am a happy subscriber though I wish they would return the Apple Music UI back to iOS 9/El Capitan style. The Big Bold Text is stupid and takes more work to get to certain controls.
I couldnt agree more. People bashed the old layout but this new one is amazingly retarded. Big bold ugly fonts which make everything look ugly and cheap, for every stupid thing you need to make two or more extra finger presses - like just shuffling songs. In the previous version you easily just clicked the "Shuffle" button at the bottom while listening to a song and the next one would be randomly picked. But noo, now some idiot at Apple decided that this is too simple/hard and now everytime you want to shuffle songs you need to go to Library - songs - Shuffle All. And dont get me started on playlists - in iOS 9 you clicked ona playlist (lets say in connect), then it opened that playlist where you could see all the songs in it and choose which one to play. Now? Oh no, you cant do anything like this now. If you click on any playlist, it will automatically start playing it and you'll have no idea which songs are even on it! If you want to see that, you need to go For you tab - scroll down to recently played - click on the playlist and only then you'll be able to see the songs list. Another retarded thing is the songs list. I dont know anybody that would have it's library set by the authors and not by songs names. But noo, once again, some amazingly stupid apple employee decided that it is god to have all songs in library based under the authors name, and if you want to change that you need to quit the Music app, go to settings, scroll down to the god damn music icon, click it and only then you'll find the feature to decide wether to see songs by its Artits or by its name.

I can not say how much annoyed i am by this iOS 10 version of apple music. It's stupid, it's slow, it's ugly and cumbersome. The previous version had its flaws, but it was light years ahead of this piece of crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shirasaki

Bryan Bowler

macrumors 601
Sep 27, 2008
4,021
4,338
I've been a paying subscriber of Apple Music for over a year now and I really like it. I'm pretty sure I'm hooked for life. I also reduced the cost of Apple Music by 22% by buying a ton of iTunes gift cards when they are on sale and loading them up on my account. So Apple Music only costs $7.80 a month now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mackiwilad
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.