He did a good job building a service that will be able to stand on its own without him.
It looks like the old Winamp.Pretty cool to see that Jeff Robbin, who co-created SoundJam MP which then became iTunes, is still responsible for the engineering side of Apple's music efforts.
View attachment 755130
He certainly has sucked his loot out of Apple's festering corpse. Like a clown circus.
He probably doesn't even know what he does. He only cares about the cash.
Pretty cool to see that Jeff Robbin, who co-created SoundJam MP which then became iTunes, is still responsible for the engineering side of Apple's music efforts.
View attachment 755130
I feel like the latest version is mostly fine and even enjoyable to use, especially if you're an Apple Music subscriber. Having said that, I'm slowly transitioning over to using Swinsian, or at least using it in parallel more and more for listening to my local library. Swinsian feels a lot like using iTunes ≤9, which is a good thing as far as I'm concerned. Supports folder watching, too, among other things, so that's kind of awesome. If iTunes ever goes off the deep end where I can't take it anymore, that'll be my backup plan.Yes and no... iTunes became the home of the worst UX Apple can offer. The amount of UI nonsense and frustration is mind boggling. They kept trying to simplify the beast with superficial UI changes that on a first impression seem to make the UI 'simpler' but in reality it's so much harder, non-intuitive and frustrating to use. I'd love to see someone new revamp the beast.
So Apple Music leadership right now is all legacy iTunes leaders? Remind me again why Apple needed to purchase Beats?
Probably just sticking around so he can collect one of the big fat apple paychecks, and not really doing much, but fraternizing with fellow employees. Seriously.... How much consulting does apple need for iTunes?!? You put music on it, people subscribe to listen. The rest is just design work done to the look and feel of the app. Really? What else is there?
Spotify did similar w/o this geniusFor sure on that. His music industry background and experience speaks volumes. Apple was extraordinarily lucky to have him on board.
So does Apple - as Jimmy conceded:Spotify operates at loss.
Where does one acquire a douchebag scarf like his?[/QUOTE.
GF's closet.
It might very well be true, but believe it or not, Apple core business is not Apple Music, it is a service that they use to enrich the user experience for their devices, that makes it hard to write it as loss, if it manages to keep people using their devices (or bring new users in), it is making them money.So does Apple - as Jimmy conceded:
https://9to5mac.com/2017/11/29/jimmy-iovine-streaming-business-spotify/amp/
That indeed is the positive spin on it.It might very well be true, but believe it or not, Apple core business is not Apple Music, it is a service that they use to enrich the user experience for their devices, that makes it hard to write it as loss, if it manages to keep people using their devices (or bring new users in), it is making them money.
Spotify on the other hand has nothing else making money for them.
I am sure many non exec people go to work just for the company and to respect the brand they work for and not for the money , RIIIIGHT!