I came across this article on Google News. I do no see the benefit of signing up for an Apple News subscription currently. Perhaps with the bundle but I do not subscribe to Apple TV + either unfortunately.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple News+ Struggling to Get New Subscribers
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
My library offers free access to a wide variety of popular magazines, for example I get the electronic addition of the Economist which saves me $100/yr. Why buy Apple News+?
An added bonus is ebooks, audiobooks, Acorn TV and the great Works sets as well. In the library I can use the computers to access a huge set of data bases to pull down articles, look up car service manuals, etc. I'm lucky my local library system has moved into the digital age.
Oh, I can still get printed books, DVDs/CDs and magazines as well.
An added bonus is ebooks, audiobooks, Acorn TV and the great Works sets as well. In the library I can use the computers to access a huge set of data bases to pull down articles, look up car service manuals, etc. I'm lucky my local library system has moved into the digital age.
Oh, I can still get printed books, DVDs/CDs and magazines as well.
While I was signing up for Disney+ on Tuesday, my brother called to tell me how great it was and that I need to sign up for it right now, he thought there was a chance I didn't know about it. I binged for 12 hours straight. Pretty much everyone I know has it. My father-in-law wants to retire right now to be able to spend more time with it, he loves the old back catalog. For the past 2 days my family has seemed to rename our AppleTV the "Disney box", as in "Turn on the Disney box".
Mandalorian is fantastic. Apple should be embarrassed to dump their steaming pile of original content into the same market. I have spoken.
And I say all this as someone who strongly dislikes Disney for their lobbying and screwing over the public domain as well as their general business practices. I never thought I'd buy anything from them, but this is just a complete shut up and and take my money service.
Meanwhile I haven't even signed up for my free year of Apple TV+, nothing looks remotely appealing, and I don't know anyone outside this forum who admits to having it. I will have a look at the Foundation series when we get more info, but so far Apple TV+ is 100% trash to me.
Samsung tried this in Android with a free news feed app Flipboard as one of its Home Screen (pushed hard enough) but I think most people didn’t even bother to use them.
Now Apple offering similar type of service for a hefty monthly subscription!
Beyond Apple Music I don’t find its subscriptions services are wonderful! They try to push iCloud but it makes sense only if your family members have iPhones otherwise it will be either wasteful or too expensive!
Now Apple offering similar type of service for a hefty monthly subscription!
Beyond Apple Music I don’t find its subscriptions services are wonderful! They try to push iCloud but it makes sense only if your family members have iPhones otherwise it will be either wasteful or too expensive!
I canceled after my trial because the content finding interface was messy, and the magazine format doesn’t work on a phone screen.
Not surprised, the very idea of a newspaper and magazine sub service sounds like something that belongs in a pre-2010 era.
Peddling fake news and "orange man bad" articles to the useful idiots who couldn't afford the service anyway - what could go wrong?!
Only when the magazines aren't formatted for the medium. They should remove those 'PDF' style magazines from the store and not allow it in my opinion.
I don't entirely agree, I think there is value to proper content.
I've been a paying customer since one and while I don't read many of the magazines, the price is worth it for some of the trade magazines.
I don't think it's "that people don't read", everybody reads online, but just not the format Apple News is using. Most users would probably prefer a much richer experience, not just PDF looking pages. It needs to be more dynamic and easy for you to open a news story in Chrome or something besides Safari. It would also be awesome if paysites would see you have an Apple News account and let you log in or something.
The idea is good enough, but for Apple News to become great, it needs to match the best blogs out there with videos, animation etc. The problem for most magazines is that they probably don't have the budget to be more than print mag.
I don't think it's "that people don't read", everybody reads online, but just not the format Apple News is using. Most users would probably prefer a much richer experience, not just PDF looking pages. It needs to be more dynamic and easy for you to open a news story in Chrome or something besides Safari. It would also be awesome if paysites would see you have an Apple News account and let you log in or something.
The idea is good enough, but for Apple News to become great, it needs to match the best blogs out there with videos, animation etc. The problem for most magazines is that they probably don't have the budget to be more than print mag.
I agree with you in terms of Free vs Paid news but.. there is no equivalent of Spotify/Apple Music in reading industry and I do not think it will ever be..
UK News+ subscriber here. So far I’m conflicted with the service, although I’ve gone past the free 1 month trial and am now paying.
At it’s best, the service has some terrific content presented in a reflowable manner. Time magazine works very well indeed on my 10.5 iPad Pro and shrinks down and reformat itself well on my iPhone 11 Pro. The PDF based back issues are another matter though. They’re just about manageable and readable on my iPad; I’ve given up even trying anything PDF based on my iPhone though. The experience is terrible.
I’m hoping that more and more magazines in the service will move to the dynamic reflowing model. Like Apple Music, iCloud Storage, Apple Arcade and ATV+ I’m sharing my News+ subscription with my family. Unlike the rest of my family I’m the only one with an iPad, everyone else is on a phone (Xr & SE). I initially though the gaming magazines would be of interest to my son (EDGE, Xbox monthly etc) but the reading PDFs on his SE is a complete non-starter.
Question is, will the content providers stick it out given likely subscriber numbers and anticipated financial returns?
I already have a monthly digital subscription to another UK broadsheet for my daily news fix. I was hoping that The Times content would be broadly equivalent to a full subscription - it most definitely is not. Going into News+ > The Times > News, there is current news but everything that could be construed as politically partisan (either way) is simply not featured. This is made all the more stark given the impending general election. Not sure if this is the content provider holding this ‘prime’ content back for its own subscription service, or if this is an editorial decision being taken my Apple’s editorial team.
On balance, I’ll likely continue with my News+ subscription. The daily/current news side doesn’t really compete with a full digital newspaper subscription elsewhere, but the magazine content is enough and well presented enough to be worth my while.
Lastly, for those asking why news should be paid for when it can be got free elsewhere, or decrying the entirety of the established media as ‘fake new’, I’d like to quote an answer given by Yuval Noah Harari on the matter.
“You say if you want good information, pay good money for it. The Silicon Valley adage is information wants to be free, and to some extent the online newspaper industry has followed that. Is that wise?
The idea of free information is extremely dangerous when it comes to the news industry. If there’s so much free information out there, how do you get people’s attention? This becomes the real commodity. At present there is an incentive in order to get your attention – and then sell it to advertisers and politicians and so forth – to create more and more sensational stories, irrespective of truth or relevance. Some of the fake news comes from manipulation by Russian hackers but much of it is simply because of the wrong incentive structure. There is no penalty for creating a sensational story that is not true. We’re willing to pay for high quality food and clothes and cars, so why not high quality information?”
At it’s best, the service has some terrific content presented in a reflowable manner. Time magazine works very well indeed on my 10.5 iPad Pro and shrinks down and reformat itself well on my iPhone 11 Pro. The PDF based back issues are another matter though. They’re just about manageable and readable on my iPad; I’ve given up even trying anything PDF based on my iPhone though. The experience is terrible.
I’m hoping that more and more magazines in the service will move to the dynamic reflowing model. Like Apple Music, iCloud Storage, Apple Arcade and ATV+ I’m sharing my News+ subscription with my family. Unlike the rest of my family I’m the only one with an iPad, everyone else is on a phone (Xr & SE). I initially though the gaming magazines would be of interest to my son (EDGE, Xbox monthly etc) but the reading PDFs on his SE is a complete non-starter.
Question is, will the content providers stick it out given likely subscriber numbers and anticipated financial returns?
I already have a monthly digital subscription to another UK broadsheet for my daily news fix. I was hoping that The Times content would be broadly equivalent to a full subscription - it most definitely is not. Going into News+ > The Times > News, there is current news but everything that could be construed as politically partisan (either way) is simply not featured. This is made all the more stark given the impending general election. Not sure if this is the content provider holding this ‘prime’ content back for its own subscription service, or if this is an editorial decision being taken my Apple’s editorial team.
On balance, I’ll likely continue with my News+ subscription. The daily/current news side doesn’t really compete with a full digital newspaper subscription elsewhere, but the magazine content is enough and well presented enough to be worth my while.
Lastly, for those asking why news should be paid for when it can be got free elsewhere, or decrying the entirety of the established media as ‘fake new’, I’d like to quote an answer given by Yuval Noah Harari on the matter.
“You say if you want good information, pay good money for it. The Silicon Valley adage is information wants to be free, and to some extent the online newspaper industry has followed that. Is that wise?
The idea of free information is extremely dangerous when it comes to the news industry. If there’s so much free information out there, how do you get people’s attention? This becomes the real commodity. At present there is an incentive in order to get your attention – and then sell it to advertisers and politicians and so forth – to create more and more sensational stories, irrespective of truth or relevance. Some of the fake news comes from manipulation by Russian hackers but much of it is simply because of the wrong incentive structure. There is no penalty for creating a sensational story that is not true. We’re willing to pay for high quality food and clothes and cars, so why not high quality information?”
Wow, what a great contribution to this forum. What does that even mean?
[automerge]1573809242[/automerge]
Are you like 14?
Last edited:
Very nice arguments, I like it, keep up the level of highly intelligent points, these are almost indestructible! Also, sorry, I couldn’t not read your sentence in Mr. Jackso....Mr. Jeferosons voice from South Park ”No..that’s ignorant, stop being ignorant” 😂
I'm right with you on that one, though the wife and I have been debating the subject at length. - she's wrong of course
I much prefer it when the magazines I read have adapted to the format of the device I am using, none of this pinching in and out nonsense. For some reason though, my wife is the complete opposite. She much preferred the more static scanned PDF style of the Readly app we had been using prior to Apple News+. Honestly, for being 10 years younger than me she's very old-fashioned with some things for her age.
I don't wish for this to sound condescending, but have you gone through the magazines and clicked on "Follow" for the ones you are interested in reading?
Once you've done this it does almost everything you ask for. When you go into the News+ Tab, all of the publications you are interested in are listed right along the top of the page, you can just ignore everything else below that if you please.
Tap on See All to view all of your followed publications, it only displays two issues of the same publication when they are within the same month, such as November is still available in November, even though later that month the December issue comes out.
You can still browse all of the back issues should you wish, by tapping on ... likewise, by again tapping on ... you can remove an issue you have read from all of your devices if it doesn't disappear quickly enough for you (it will still be available in back issues). Whenever a new issue of one of your followed publications is released, you receive a notification if you have set those up.
Digital "newsstand"-like subscriptions have been around for at least a decade, ie what Apple News is.
Tbh, when using Apple news, I click on probably 1 article a day that requires news+ - I'm not going to pay a monthly sub to read 1 article a day!
On a related note, has anyone else noticed how obnoxious the ads have gotten in the News app recently?
On a related note, has anyone else noticed how obnoxious the ads have gotten in the News app recently?
Sounds about like Netflix too since you have to sift through all the garbage there.
Too expensive and not enough content. Eddy Cue's motto.
Another Eddy Cue-ism...
--It's going to grow and there will be more offerings.
It looks exactly the same to me as when it launched.
Like everything else, once it is launched, they forget about it.
It would have been nice for Tim to give an update at the last presentation.
The silence is deafening.
Another Eddy Cue-ism...
--It's going to grow and there will be more offerings.
It looks exactly the same to me as when it launched.
Like everything else, once it is launched, they forget about it.
It would have been nice for Tim to give an update at the last presentation.
The silence is deafening.
