The retina display is incredibly overrated (vs the hi res displays never mind the horsepower needed to support it) and SSD memory is too expensive for the amount I need.
I could not disagree more. For some serious work, the retina is quickly becoming a #2 requirement, after an SSD. I don't want to wait for my computer, ever. It's a 1980s thing to wait for computers. First, cassette tapes, then floppies, then hard disks. No more, I want an SSD. Crucial has just announced a 1TB one for $600, so prices are going in the right direction, as was to be expected.
About the retina display: it's the only one that offers resolution independence. If you set your 1920x1080 Windows screen to 1440x800 when you want to do some lazy surfing in the couch, it'll look ugly. With retina, the "fake" resolutions look absolutely as perfect as native resolutions. I can set the 13" rMBP to 1280x800 for some surfing or to 1600 resolution for work, with a working window left and a data window right, and both look as good.
Because I refuse to buy three mobile devices, a good retina laptop + a good smartphone are perfect. And cheaper than buying laptop+smartphone+iPad, too.
An iPad could be considered a computer but certainly not a laptop.
Could be considered a computer ? Hmm. I would use that phrasing in relationship to cars and other non-obvious computers these days ("My Tesla could be considered a computer."). The iPad is so obviously a large pocket computer that it is, for me, perfectly incompatible with having a true pocket computer that also allows me to make calls.
It is, however, a laptop because it resides on laps more of the time than on desks (where you find "desktops") or in pockets (where you find "pocket computers", the traditional name before somebody in marketing dubbed them PDAs or, when they got wireless modems, smartphones).
Peter.